Daniel Finkelstein
Win a year of free pizza at PizzaExpress

It’s been very eloquent so far, hasn’t it? Euro 2004 was all over the place. But Euro 2008 has, in a remarkably short space of time, told you a lot about the footballing nations of Europe.
Let’s start with the Dutch. Ruud van Nistelrooy says that his team’s form has taken him by surprise. It really shouldn’t have. Holland were, right from the start, the best side in Europe. The only thing that was stopping them from being favourites was that, while the Fink Tank expected them to reach the quarter-finals, there was still a 43 per cent chance of them being eliminated at the group stage because of being the drawn in the same pool as France, Italy and Romania.
Now that this risk is behind them it is possible to see just how strong Holland are. They had an 11.2 per cent chance of winning the tournament when it started, but now they have a stonking 24.6 per cent chance. Remember, of course, that this still means that there is a 76 per cent probability that the whole thing will end in disappointment for them. But remember, too, that the side with the next biggest chance has just 17.2 per cent.
That side is Spain. And we have been taught something about them, too. There is a good deal of nonsense talked about them not “performing on the big stage” or whatever. The truth is that you can be very good indeed without actually, say, winning the World Cup – that’s what probability is all about.
Now, France, Italy and Romania. The least surprising result to date, as far as the Fink Tank was concerned, was that these three teams drew with each other in low-scoring encounters. Romania, to start with, are very good indeed. It is they, and not Italy, who should have been disappointed with the 1-1 draw last Friday. And not just because of Adrian Mutu’s missed penalty late on. They should have been disappointed because they are actually a better side than Italy. Yes, Italy won the World Cup, but you can win that trophy without being anywhere near the best side in the world. And that’s exactly what Italy did.
The fact that France were hammered by Holland is far more surprising than the goalless draw against Romania. France cannot score, but they have the best defence in the competition.
Apart from Holland, the team that should be most satisfied with how they have performed in the competition so far is Portugal. They started with just a 4.6 per cent shot of lifting the trophy. A big reason for this was that they had only a 49 per cent chance of making it through to the quarter-finals. Now that they have guaranteed their presence there after two games, their trophy chance has risen to 9.6 per cent.
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
In our new series, Tony Hawks takes a dry, wry look at modern life - junk mail, interminable meetings and snooty sales assistants
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers

Find tickets for:
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
2007
£30,000
2008
£44,990
2008
£48,489
Great car insurance deals online
c.£75,000
GlosFirstmeansbusiness
Gloucestershire
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
£
Circa £100k
NHS
London
£23,500 + benefits
MI5
London
Some of the finest Apts & Penthouses
Across London
Great Investment, River Views
Luxury properties within exclusive development in
Chislehurst Kent
A new experience in Luxury Living
Multi–Centre
from Only £829pp
With Ramblers Worldwide Holidays!
£POA
List your property with two leading travel websites
£POA
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - search houses for sale and rooms and property to rent in the UK. Milkround Job Search - for graduate careers in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
eh sorry!
Posted this on the wrong column!
leigh van cleef, geneva, switzerland
Which goals was Coupet at fault for?
RVP's goal? surely. Robben's goal? maybe. The rest: debatable
(he can't take all blame for Italy's goals).
You claim to be 100% scientific, but already are entering into guesses, opinion, conjecture etc.
Even a nonscientist can easily disprove your theory!
leigh van cleef, geneva, switzerland
He is assuming all teams have the same level of quality which just doesn't work in football.
KC, London,
It's apparently statistical Sam, but still leads to some odd predictions.
i happily bet on Portugal to progress from their group and am amazed that this outcome was a mere 49% probable.
And Romania are better than Italy?????????
James W, London, UK
How exactly are these probabilities worked out? Is it just "educated guess work" or are there some statistics/information to back this up?
sam bobly, Brisbane, Australia