Matt Dickinson, Chief Sports Correspondent
Subscribe to The Times and The Sunday Times
It was a night that no self-respecting Chelsea fan would have missed for the world, when the heartache of all the Champions League near-misses was banished in an orgy of West London celebration. So where was Roman Abramovich?
This is the man who, we were told, fell in love with the game watching Real Madrid’s march on the European Cup, so surely he would not want to miss the greatest midweek party that Stamford Bridge has hosted. Lots on at work? Hen-pecked into staying at home? It seemed unlikely. The official explanation was “political business” with Vladimir Putin, the outgoing Russian President.
Regular absenteeism might also lead you to believe that he has been frustrated with Avram Grant’s failure to turn José Mourinho’s relentless threshing machine into football’s great entertainers. Last night they more than made up for those failings with an overload of drama, emotion and fierce competitive will.
Those virtues may not be enough to turn Abramovich’s world blue, because he has missed more Chelsea matches than he has attended in recent months, but his team, his creation, are in the Champions League final, and in Moscow of all places, so it is a safe bet that he intends to make up for all the nights he has missed.
Asked who he wanted to face in the final, Sir Alex Ferguson had smirkingly requested Liverpool. “Because if it is Chelsea,” the Manchester United manager had said, “Abramovich will buy up all the tickets.” He was only half-joking. The Chelsea owner is a man who does not book a table but a whole restaurant, who does not rent a ski chalet but takes over a resort. The Luzhniki Stadium holds 69,500, which is barely enough room for a billionaire when he has added up his bodyguards, his friends and his kitchen cabinet — let alone the 250 Chelsea staff that he has promised to fly out.
It has taken five years and £578 million to reach the final — although Abramovich will have lost more sleep over the time than the money. There was an unseemly impatience about the Chelsea operation from the moment that Abramovich arrived and went shopping for players like Imelda Marcos used to snap up shoes.
The irony is that he stands on the brink of grasping the European Cup at the end of a campaign that, through the sacking of Mourinho and his replacement by Grant, was expected to bring nothing better than unsatisfactory drift.
That Chelsea, built on Abramovich’s mega-millions, should form one half of the first all-English final seems appropriate. The confrontation with Manchester United may have been brought about by a swerving Paul Scholes missile and a Frank Lampard penalty of remarkable courage but, these days, it is not just about the football.
There is also the business, and the presence of United and Chelsea in Moscow is not only testament to the teams but to the collective, corporate prosperity of the Premier League, particularly its four-club elite.
The global pull has made it possible to attract players such as Cristiano Ronaldo, Michael Ballack and Fernando Torres at their peak rather than simply seeking a quick pay-day before retirement. We still lack the very best South Americans, but the clubs are throwing money at a better class of foreign player, thanks to the wisdom of a better class of foreign coach.
Now is not the time to go over the apparent contradiction of why English clubs are dominating European competition, yet Euro 2008 will kick off this summer without an England team. Our reliance on the best foreign players, and our own technical failings, are well documented.
But whatever our imbalance of imports and exports, it is undeniable that the Premier League is now top dog in continental football. Spain had its all-La Liga final in 2000, Italy its Serie A head to head in 2003. An all-English final has been coming given that Liverpool (twice) and Arsenal have ensured a representative in each of the past three showpieces. English hordes will descend on Moscow and, without the tension that would have been inevitable had United faced Liverpool, hopefully it will be a good advertisement.
Better certainly than the previous time these sides met on a showpiece occasion, in the FA Cup Final at Wembley last May. Repeat that stalemate and the rest of the Continent will be hoping that an all-English final is a freak.
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles

Find a course, arrange a game and save money


in The Sunday Times, Times and Times Online
2007
£47,995
2008
£42,945
06/2006
£40,850
Great car insurance deals online
£33,000
Macmillan Cancer Support
Central/South West
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£30k OTE
Meltwater News
Nationwide
circa £70k
Central Office of Information
London
Great Dubai Investment Opportunities
from £89,950
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Great Investment, River Views
New York Christmas Shopping
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Didn't United spend treble what Chelsea did over the last two years? Are they not £700m in debt while Chelsea has paid off all their debt? Did Chelsea not win Win the PL twice (coming 2nd three times), 2 league Cups, an FA Cup and a Community Shield? Now a CL final too. This is good value for £578m.
Harry, Birmingham,
Look at Liverpool, Man U, Arsenal, Tottenham, Man City etc.
they have overseas millions poured in. Glazer Bros
paid out huge amount, Hicks and his mate and all of that is borrowed money. Abromovitch got a modern stadium (even if smaller than he'd like) plus agreat team and training complex
J Smith, Sydney, Australia
Neil in London - I'm not sure you're right about this. I think the behaviour of the Man U players and management at the Bridge last Saturday has reminded a lot of people why they used to hate them with such a passion.
Are you a bitter gooner by any chance?
Andy, Banbury, UK
Man United fans and the rest always use our cash injections as an escape goat to have cheap shots at us! So what if we have all that cash? We not buying the referees! So please come up with a better reason to hide under as to why man u is afraid of chelsea!!!!!
Keagz, Bloemfontein, South Africa
Miss the point much, Russell!
Man Utd is the world's richest club because of its own success. Any players it has bought are out of its own earnings. It is rich because it is successful.
Chelski is successful because it is rich. It is the biggest loss-making football club on the planet.
Stuart, Costa Del Sol, Spain
Fully Agreed with Neil in London, Chelsea FC & Fans are low class!. Even with all the money they have spent they have never played attractive football. Just waiting for the house of cards to fall down once Abramovich decides he is bored with Chelsea shouldn't be long now!
JimmyLev, Cobham, Surrey
Neil - how are arsenal doing this season? And those grapes your chewing on - good?
patx, Brisbane,
A Man Utd fan from London - what a surprise!!
Mark, London,
£578 million? Surely not on players alone. I for one won't be supporting either of the two teams in Moscow although I predict a Didier Drogba winner.
It says something however about Chelsea when Manure aren't the team that everyone hates.
EA, Birmingham,
Rakesh . People in the UK have grown up, Russian owned, American owned. Not an issue.
What Chelsea have done is cracked the fiscal dominance of Liverpool and Man Utd that had prevailed for 20 years and they should be applauded.
Respect goes to Arsenal who did the same without a big backer!
Mark, London, England
Russell - Dubai
What you don't grasp is Utd's money is created by gate money and commercial revenue from a massive fan base. Being a small club with a small fan base Chelsea lose serious amounts of money every year and are bailed out by Russian oil money - that is the difference.
John Lint, York,
That's right Neil, because Man Utd is not owned by millionnaires; nor has it purchased very expensive players at a cost of millions. As the entire nation knows, Man Utd has grafted its nine (soon to be ten) premiership titles thanks to entirely homegrown talent like Cantona, Yorke, Ronaldo and Tevez
Russell, Dubai,
So the fact that Man Utd spend far more than any other team, barring Chelsea, supports the argument that Chelsea have bought success? Intellectual dishonesty and hypocrasy. All successful teams - AC, Madrid, Man Utd etc - are owned by billionnaires who outspend their opponents. Fact.
Russell, Dubai,
Nice try Neil. GO CHELSEA!!!
John, Yokohama, Japan
I recall a big majority in Stamford Bridge just a few weeks ago screaming "you don't know what you're doing" at Avram Grant. Oh how fickle these Southerners are but then when you've only just started to support a club that's what you get. Come on Utd, a truely great club built on genuine money. 2-0
John Lint, York,
Well done to both United and Chelsea for reaching the final. May the first all 'english' affair bring about a fantastic spectacle of football. My team failed at the bridge but I wish them both well in the final.
Rob, Liverpool, UK
Envy, thy name is England! I have yet to meet a Brit who likes Chelsea. Some have been candid enough to admit, though, that a Russian owned club is something that they can never stomach.
Wonder how long the Brits can carry on the Great Game? Get over it, schmucks!
Rakesh Simha, Auckland, New Zealand
For the dignity of the competition, Man Utd need to win. Mickey Mouse could "manage" Chelski and get to the final. All the money spent and all that so called talent, it would be a travesty if Chelsea win, proving that money has bought success. Utd have a long history with this Cup, Chelski don't
Paul, West Mids,
Well done Chelsea, £578 million to get to the Champions League final. What an amazing achievement.
Rest assured the entire nation, and world I suspect, will be supporting Man Utd.
Neil, London, UK