Robert Winnett and John Elliott
Your last chance to get tickets to Top Gear Live
MORE than 300 top-flight footballers are avoiding millions of pounds of income tax by using loopholes that Gordon Brown pledged to close more than a decade ago.
The players and dozens of managers are declaring themselves non-domiciled or claiming non-resident status by commuting in and out of Britain for matches and training sessions.
The tax breaks have helped to attract some of the world’s best footballers to Britain, but also mean that, despite their multi-million-pound earnings, many of them are paying lower rates of tax than their supporters.
In total, 302 footballers or managers have “non-domiciled” status in Britain and a further 67 claim they are “not resident”, according to Treasury documents released under the Freedom of Information Act.
Among those who qualify for non-domiciled status are the Manchester United stars Cristiano Ronaldo, who is Portuguese, and Owen Hargreaves, who was born in Canada but plays for England. Their representatives declined to comment.
David Beckham’s spokesman said that he was non-resident in Britain for tax purposes but would pay tax on his earnings in America.
Almost half the players in the Premiership are from overseas, and the poor showing of the national team is blamed by some on the displacement of home-grown players by foreign stars. Sven-Goran Eriksson, the former England coach who is now managing Manchester City, is thought to be a beneficiary of the tax loophole.
A source familiar with the arrangements of managers said: “Non-domiciled status is a perfectly legal status. It’s automatic if people like Sven wish to have it.” Brown pledged to close the loopholes in opposition but has so far failed to act despite the scheme being “under review” by the Treasury since 2002.
Accountants and lawyers have devised sophisticated ways for Premiership stars to benefit from the loophole. The non-domiciled players must be born abroad or have parents born abroad. They typically sign multiple contracts for their services.
One contract pays the player for matches in Britain. They have another, more valuable contract for their “global image rights”, which covers the money earned by the club to sell their merchandise and television rights. A third contract pays for any foreign appearances.
British tax is typically paid only for money earned on the first contract, with money earned on the other contracts paid tax-free to an offshore tax haven.
In contrast, players in Spain must pay tax to the Spanish government on their worldwide earnings.
A memo from a Revenue official in May 2005 about the nondomicile system states: “Quite a lot of the ND [non-domicile] and NOR [not ordinarily resident] cases dealt with . . . were either professional footballers or professional football coaches/mana-gers. Top football players and managers earn large amounts of money and so may well have relatively complex tax affairs.”
Mike Warburton, a tax partner at Grant Thornton, the accountants, said: “It is definitely an important draw for foreign players and these rules have certainly been a factor in the Premiership becoming the top league in the world.”
A football agent who represents several household names said: “I have heard of people flying in and out of the country for training sessions and matches – particularly managers. It is a game now staying one step ahead of the tax authorities.”
Footballers are the latest group to be identified as beneficiaries of loopholes offered to the global super-rich by Britain. The heads of private equity firms have recently come under criticism after it emerged they paid tax at a rate of less than 10% on multi-million-pound earnings.
Vincent Cable, the Liberal Democrat Treasury spokesman, said: “We need an open and transparent investigation into the use of nondomicile, followed by a tightening of the rules. The number of nondoms is rising rapidly as people realise the easy pickings on offer.”
A Labour peer said: “The situation does seem to be becoming deeply unfair. These guys [footballers] are paying lower rates of tax than the working men paying a fortune to watch them.”
The Treasury documents reveal that there were 77,000 nondomiciled people in Britain in 2002, avoiding an estimated £1 billion in tax. The number is understood to have risen to almost 200,000 since then.
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
In our new series, Tony Hawks takes a dry, wry look at modern life - junk mail, interminable meetings and snooty sales assistants
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers

Find tickets for:
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
2007
£30,000
2006
£14,337
2008
£39,937
Great car insurance deals online
c.£75,000
GlosFirstmeansbusiness
Gloucestershire
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
£
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
Competitive Package
Npower
West Midlands
Some of the finest Apts & Penthouses
Across London
Great Investment, River Views
Luxury properties within exclusive development in
Chislehurst Kent
A new experience in Luxury Living
Multi–Centre
from Only £829pp
With Ramblers Worldwide Holidays!
£POA
List your property with two leading travel websites
£POA
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - search houses for sale and rooms and property to rent in the UK. Milkround Job Search - for graduate careers in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Its not a scam. It's perfectly legal and legitimate. The only reason some people get so excite is because they are jealous. Which is why fox hunting was "banned". Pure jealousy.
Posh, London,
You commenters don't get it, do you? A large part of why non-doms (not just footballers) come to the United Kingdom IS the tax break that they get. They spend taxes on all their purchases (think VAT, customs, stamp duties, etc.) and on their UK-based income.
If the country tried to tax them, they would simply prefer more hospitable climes. Keep in mind that these are usually highly-mobile individuals.
So what would you prefer: a.) taxing non-doms on their UK income only, as is currently the case, or b.) not generating any tax revenues because they never arrived here in the first place?
John Dewey, London,
If you disagree with this scam then there is a petition on the Downing St website you can sign to protest. It is astonishing that very few have done so. No wonder these scams exist as the great British public seem unaware of them, and unwilling to object even when they find they are paying more tax than the super-rich. Amazing.
Edward, Surrey, UK
Of course, the way to deal with it is to make expenses non tax-deductible for the clubs, unless the expenses, as income in the hands of the recipient, can be demonstrated to come fully under the regulations of an approved tax authority. So a Spaniard working in the UK can elect to be taxed in Spain, and that's OK - his wages are allowed as a tax-deductible expense in the books of his UK employer. If this Spaniard elects to be taxed in an unapproved tax authority, say the Cayman Islands, then his wages are not allowed as a tax-deductible expense in the UK. Simple rule really. Expenses are only allowed to be tax-deductible if the recipient is being assessed on them as income by an approved tax authority. Far too effective for there to be any chance of it actually happening here, though.
Simon Stephenson, Windermere, UK
What do you expect from Bliar's government who promised so much, yet delivered so little. I bet if you look into some of these government politicians and so called consultants, they will also have accountants and lawyers looking for ways to avoid paying taxes. Lets take a look at there schemes after all they are paid out of the public purse. Do they have anything to hide?
ann, london, uk
What a pathetic system that allows those earning many tens and hundreds of thousands a week to avoid paying taxation when those paid just a few hundred a week are hit more and more by direct and indirect taxation. It is time the EU gripped this anomaly and indicated that, as in Spain, any sportsman or woman playing within the EU shall pay direct income taxation in the country they play football or any other sport. If they do not then they will not be allowed to play football or any other sport within the EU.
Kenneth Armitage, Suffolk, England.
I believe that if you earn it here you pay the tax here, simple policy, who do the players think pay for the upkeep of the roads on which they travel or the many police needed to look after them.
As the article says in Spain the players pay tax on all earnings and this does not affect the quality of world superstars who play there.
Mike, Salford,