David Brown
Subscribe to The Times and The Sunday Times
For an island nation weary of summer hosepipe bans, the prospect of using our greatest natural resource to provide unlimited drinking water seemed an obvious solution.
But as weather forecasters predicted another hot, dry summer, plans to convert the sea into drinking water were abandoned after a two-year trial showed the scheme to be unfeasible.
A pilot desalination scheme at Newhaven harbour, East Sussex, investigated the potential for a full-scale plant capable of producing 9.5 million litres (two million gallons) of drinking water a day. It was watched closely by water companies across the South of England, which have experienced supply shortages in recent summers.
The trial found that producing drinking water through desalination is up to ten times more expensive than from traditional sources. The cost of producing desalinated water during shortages, or at time of peak demand, would cost £450 per million litres, compared with £35 from ground water supplies and £50 from rivers.
It also found that the power required for the two-stage purification process — in which water is first filtered through sand before being forced at high pressure through a semi-permeable membrane — is environmentally unacceptable. The investigation concluded that it would require 10,000 square metres of solar panels — 1½ times the size of a football pitch — to produce one million litres of water a day, enough to supply about 6,000 people. There would also be environmental impact in disposing of the highly concentrated brine left over from purification.
David Shore, operations director at South East Water, which serves Sussex and Kent, said: “Our trial has demonstrated that desalination is not yet the right solution for delivering water at peak times or during extended dry periods such as droughts.
“Desalination remains an expensive option in terms of operating and environmental costs when compared to developing additional resources, or through other ways of managing customer demand. Many technological advances have been made in desalination and so it will remain an option to consider as part of long-term water resources plans.”
Desalination is used widely in other parts of the world, but mainly in countries with relatively low energy costs or those with no alternative supplies from rivers or ground water.
Robin Wiseman, editor of Desalination & Water Reuse, said that scientists in such locations were making significant advances in technology, which could make plants viable in the future. “I am sure that that by 2020 the technology will have advanced so that there will be some plants on the south coast of England,” he said.
A report by the Water Services Regulation Authority (Ofwat), which approved the South East Water trial, said: “Desalination is becoming more efficient but still uses substantial amounts of energy . . . [and] creates a waste stream of highly concentrated salts. Because of this, in most cases desalination is not cost-effec-tive as there are lower cost alternative sources of water available.”
Thames Water has appealed to ministers for permission to build a desalination plant after plans were blocked by Ken Liv-ingstone, the Mayor of London, on environmental grounds. The plant, at Beckton, would produce 140 million litres a day, enough for about 900,000 people, from the “brackish” waters of the Thames estuary, which have about a third of the salt content of the sea.
Low salt
— The the first recorded desalination was in the 17th century, when Japanese sailors used earthenware pots to boil seawater
— In 1791 Thomas Jefferson was asked to investigate claims that a new “desalting process” (by chemical addition /distillation) could provide fresh water to the infant US Navy
— Malta claims credit for the world’s first “commercial” desalination plant, which opened at Sliema in 1881
— In 1907 the Ottoman Turks installed Saudi Arabia’s first desalination plant in Jedda
Sources: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; National Environmental Services Center, West Virginia University; Halcrow Water Services
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


Overseas contacts and local business information

A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests

Dubrovnik, the Dalmatian Coast and Montenegro

2007
£47,995
2008
£42,945
06/2006
£40,850
Great car insurance deals online
£33,000
Macmillan Cancer Support
Central/South West
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£30k OTE
Meltwater News
Nationwide
circa £70k
Central Office of Information
London
Great Dubai Investment Opportunities
from £89,950
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Great Investment, River Views
New York Christmas Shopping
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
We may rise to the interesting challenge of unlimited water from the sea, or unlimited energy from nuclear sources. But it's the wrong challenge!
If we need to treat sea water "in England's green and pleasant land" then the problem is not too little money or water. The problem is too many people with too much money using more water every year because we think we can. But if it's not there, we can't.
Using more energy or chemicals will come back to bite us, so we must learn to live with what we've got. So perhaps we should recycle, like they are beginning to do in Queensland Australia? But, the water in the River Thames is used about seven times over before it reaches London.
So maybe we should think about how many people we put on one crowded island.
Roger Middleton, London, England
I am confused. Why do they say it is expensive when another article says Jersey pant 6m litres cost 2000 pounds? This is .000017 pence a litre.
That does not sound expensive. Is the answer lots of smaller plants at strategic locations?
large scale solution my be the problem.
It occurs to me the sea water might be pukmpe directly to homes and subjected to domestic osmosis and purification.
If a bike were used as the domestic source of pumping then
family helath would improve.
Barrie M Machin, Perth, Australia
The residual brine might not be a major problem if you are able to dilute it with fresh seawater several times the original volume --- and release it back into the sea. A million liters of fresh drinking water would require the residual brine to be diluted with about 10 million liters of fresh seawater if a 10% increase in salinity is acceptable. The question is how much the energy cost to do this is. Maybe there is a way to dilute the brine in t sea without having to actively pump all that water.
Steve, Center Moriches, USA / NY
What's wrong with nuclear power as an energy source?
Nuclear-powered US surface warships must convert many
thousands of litres of sea water daily for crew use,not to
mention nuclear submarines.
John Vestey, Porto Ercole, (GR) Italy
We have landed men on the Moon more than 30 years ago, our satellites are beyond the Solar system, but we have not paid enough attention to the very basic substance of life, WATER! Am I correct to assume that there are no grants, or subsidies to the universities for the purpose of finding a cheap, efficient and environmentally safe desalination method? If not, WHY NOT? We can spend BILLIONS for the military, but practically nothing for our survival, precious water supply! We must be dumber than the primates still in the trees.
Bob Kornic, Shelbyville, Michigan, U.S.A.
I haven't yet seen a climate prediction turning Scotland into a desert. Has the word pipeline been obliterated from the dictionary? All the expertise and slick machinery gained and deployed in the oil boom could be used to ship excess water south at predictable cost, easy maintenance and little or no added carbon-deficit since the pumping requirement for power would be a lot lower and more manageable than trying to boil out the salt.
Or are we still trying to use big budgets as a response to simple problems since it is easier to fiddle a research budget than a simple building project? Wake up Britain!!
KR, Stockport,
The London Plant was part of a public enquiry which was supposed to report at the end of 2006.
3 months past the enquiry report due date there has been nothing, and no report in news or elswhere as to when there will be an outcome.
Can the Times advise?
David Hurren, Repton, Derbyshire
Has David Brown got his maths right? The extra costs are about £400 for 1 million litres which supplies 6,000 people. That is less than one penny per day per person. The solar panels needed to power desalination "1.5 times the size of a football pitch (how many ping pong tables?) is irrelevant and lastly it is apparently difficult to dispose of brine near the sea. I presume Ken Livingstone did the briefing. Restricting supply and water meters is a more lucrative water company business plan.
Robert, Brighton,
Too expensive for which circumstances? If the climatologists are right, in a few years we will need fresh water at any cost.
I suggest a few pilot plants (with nuclear power as energy source) in the most populated parts of the country. There would be a useful spinoff; by using the energy for desalination largely at night we could use the electricity output in the day to top up the grid and cut carbon emissions.
Most importantly, if having this technology becomes crucial, we would have gained experience, learned from our mistakes and be able to expand relatively easily - perhaps even in an export market.
Michael Bruce, Selby, Yorkshire
Scientist are concerned that melt water from Greenland will mess up the salinity of the gulf stream causing Europe to go into a cooling period. Add the concentrate to that water to keep the salt level correct.
Johnny Stansell, La Coste, USA/ Texas
interesting.........
jackie, howell, NJ
Surely the answer is to have two supplies to houses - potable (where desalination would be economic) and non-potable for bathing, wc, the garden which could be locally collected rain water. When the non-potable ran out then the tank would be automatically topped up with (metered) potable water. The need for potable water cant be much more than 1% of the non-potable.It has always seemed mad that we use drinking water on the garden.
Bob T, London, UK