Sean O'Neill, Crime Editor
We've made some changes
to The Sunday Times

Sir Ian Blair declared himself "a man of honour" today as he survived a motion of no confidence in his leadership of the Metropolitan Police.
Members of the Metropolitan Police Authority voted 15-7 against the motion which had been tabled by Conservative members and supported by Liberal Democrats.
Sir Ian won the support of Labour members of the authority and all but two of the independents who sit on it.
The vote was taken in the wake of the Stockwell shooting trial at which Scotland Yard was found guilty of serious failings in the operation that led to the death of Jean Charles de Menezes.
A separate report presented to the MPA revealed that the cost to the Met of defending the Stockwell case was £600,000, bringing its total bill for the trial – including a £175,000 fine and prosecution costs – to more than £1.1 million.
The authority was also told that £4.7million of expenditure by Met officers on corporate charge cards was not properly accounted for. A quarter of that money was made up of cash withdrawals, usually by officers on assignment overseas.
Members of Mr de Menezes’s family attended the emergency meeting of the MPA where the implications of the trial and issues of Sir Ian's leadership were debated publicly for more than four hours.
The Commissioner again told them of his personal regret over the death of Mr de Menezes.
"The case will live with me and my officers for the rest of our lives," he said.
Asking the authority for its support, Sir Ian said: "I am a man of honour. If I believed that what happened in this case made it appropriate for the commissioner to resign, then I would have gone. I would not have offered my resignation, I would have resigned."
He denied suggestions that having lost the support of one-third of his police authority he was a "lame duck" commissioner.
Sir Ian said: "I am not in a position of being 'in office but not in power'. I am in office, I will be in office and I will be in power."
The commissioner, wearing full uniform and accompanied by three of his most senior officers, sat through a frequently ill-tempered debate during which MPA members harshly criticised his record.
Bob Neill, a Conservative supporter of the no confidence motion, said the failures in Stockwell had been "so grave and so catastrophic" that Sir Ian should step down.
He said there had been a series of errors, including recording phone calls with the former Attorney General and criticism of media coverage of the Soham murders, which had damaged Sir Ian.
Mr Neill said: "Regularly, the Commissioner is now becoming the story and it is getting in the way of learning the lessons."
Lord Tope, a Liberal Democrat, said Sir Ian should follow the example of Paul Gray, who stood down as head of HM Revenue & Customs this week after the loss of the child benefit database by his staff.
Lord Tope said: "There is a difference between being responsible and taking responsibility... I've come to the conclusion that the head of this organisation has to take responsibility."
But opponents of the motion spoke out angrily at what they said was the politicisation of the debate about policing and the use of the Stockwell case for political ends.
Richard Sumray, a magistrate member of the authority, said: "This is about more than Stockwell. People are out to get the Commissioner."
Reshard Auladin said it would be wrong for the authority to allow Sir Ian to be hounded out of office.
How the new breed of location based mobile services can find your nearest cashpoint, restaurant or wi-fi hotspot
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Are you California dreaming? Explore the wonders of the Golden State. Also enter our fantastic competition
See the best entries in this year's competition
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

Overseas contacts and local business information

A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests

Compare energy prices from suppliers

2006
£189,500
NW England
2008/08
£169,950
NW England
2007/57
£35,000
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
Circa £82,000 per annum
Birmingham Women's Hospital
Birmingham
To £28k
Barclaycard
Various (outside London)
£
Up to £66,000 per annum
Hertfordshire County Council
South East
To £38k
Barclaycard
Northampton/Liverpool
2 Bathrooms, Balcony and Garden
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Dining, Shopping & Riverside Pk
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
The right result I say. Whilst the Met have learned some harsh lessons on the outcome of everything regarding this tragedy, I hope to heck that others have also learned the near catastrophic consequence of sticking their all knowing all seeing eyes and fingers into a very dangerous area that is prognostic of the actual Security of this Country.
I believe we came within an ace of destroying the very service that we demand protect us from terrorism. How much we have dented their ability to act with swift and decisive measures in any future multiple type attack may well be a very bitter pill to be swallowed at a later date.
Support those we demand to protect from fanatical evil.
God Bless the Met.
Denis Tighe, Glenrothes, UK
Northern Rock and HMRC have reminded us that if an organisation fails miserably there is only one honourable course open to its leader. Unfortunately there appears to be a different rule for the Metropolitan Police. Who can now have any confidence in the ability of the MPA effectively to discharge its public duty?
David Smith, Thurso, Scotland
Strange style of democracy at work!
The elected body - those who are elected to speak on behalf and for "the people" are ignored and those political appointees who hold no democratic mandate are the ones with the power??
Still Blaire's Britain!
R Bingham, Lauzun, France