Joanna Bale and Sadie Gray
Get 20% off your bill at Pizza Express
Adena Johnson, a widow and Labour supporter, vowed never to vote for the party if Mr Brown became Prime Minister after learning that the Chancellor defied repeated warnings over his pension fund tax raid.
Mrs Johnson, 70, said: “I feel a deep sense of betrayal. I always thought Gordon Brown was a very good Chancellor and would have preferred him as Prime Minister over Tony Blair. But this is a nasty one.”
Mrs Johnson, from Ayr, lives on her pension of £120 a week, despite having worked as a telephonist and receptionist all her life, latterly with the NHS.
She was so worried that she would not be able to pay for rising gas and electricity bills that she took out an equity-release mortgage for 25 per cent of the value of her three-bedroom, semidetached home. She said: “I always thought Tony Blair was two-faced, but it appears that Gordon Brown is probably even worse. I’ve worked all my days and now he has deprived me of a decent pension.”
John Wild, 63, a retired chemist from Chester, is worried that the Chancellor’s £5 billion-a-year assault on pension funds may have affected his prospects in retirement.
He said: “My pension fund is still viable and paying my pension, but I suspect it [Gordon Brown’s scrapping of the tax relief on dividends paid into pension funds] may have affected its viability. It’s diabolical.”
Keith Green, 67, and his wife Norma say that they can cope on his pension income and her salary, but they are worried about the future. Mr Green said: “Now it doesn’t matter how hard you save as a working man, you’re not going to have enough to live on — unless you’re in the higher echelons of a big corporation.”
Bob Hill, a retired construction project manager from Westcliff-on-Sea, Essex, cancelled his Labour Party membership recently.
He said: “What Gordon Brown has done to pensions is diabolical, but I have never trusted him as a politician. He’s too much of a spin-doctor.”
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£100k
The National Skills Academy for Social Care
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
£75k - £85k
Confidential
London
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
$3.5 million
Also avaliable for rent
Times Online Property Search will help you find it
Amazing Far East Offers - Visit Hong Kong
from £499pp
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Don't forget this is not the only hit on pensions made by this government. They re-nationalised Railtrack at the expense of pension funds, who had been the major institutional investors, without a penny paid in compensation.
Whatever the perceived faults of Railtrack, the company was considered a safe investment for pension funds, who were given no warning of the proposed re-nationalisation and theft of their savings by the government.
Now we have the worst of both worlds. A non-profit company entirely funded by the taxpayer (rather than the financial institutions) and billions stripped from our pensions with no compensation.
p a dewhurst, London,
And this man is expecting to become the next Prime Minister? What is so applalling is that it's taken so long for the truth to come out - something Mr Brown was obviously desperate to keep quiet until he was ensconced in No 10. Why would anyone save for a pension in this country? You're liable to get it taxed out of existence so as to share it equally amongst people who've never done a day's work in their lives and yet will be looked after by the State
carole, London, UK
and he is (again) out of the country !!
david, edinburgh,
Remember, its not just pensions they have hit, it is also the life insurance endowment funds. These are now badly performing and in many cases will fail to pay out the original (minimum) project returns. Brown did not care about the damage he was doing to long-term savings plans (pensions/endowments). Its this sort of behavior which has undermined people's desire to save and fosters dependency on the state - so much for enlightened New Labour
Hugh, Cotswolds, UK
This clearly marks Brown as unfit to be Prime Minister and exposes some of his appalling legacy as Chancellor.Plenty more to come on that I fear.
What is less obvious for now, but in some ways even more indefensible, is how MP's and other public sector pensions are being protected at the taxpayers expense as private sector pensions are being decimated by Brown's incompetence.
Michael Riding, Surbiton, UK
Burke and Hare snatched bodies. Brown and Blair snatched pensions and 'sold' the UK for dismembering. They have been an absolute disaster.
Lee, London,
I wrote to Brown just before the raid on pensions refering to the way in which his "young" advisors at the Treasury were attacking the existing "wealthy" pensioners pointing out the declining standard of living to which all pensioners are doomed. I hope he gets the "boot" !
dennis, Leicester, UK
He has spent the budget surplus he inherited, he has spent the taxes of 2million new immigrants, he has raised over 100 taxes and still needed to borrow 35 billions a year, and now it is finally admitted that he has spent the pensions of millions of "hard working families". Big brain? I don't think so! Well read? Possibly but he can have understood none of it.
It's nice to see the views consigned to the letters pages for the last decade reaching page 1, Brown is, as I have long held, either a fool or plain wicked.
edward green, Upminster, England
At last Gordon Brown is exposed for what he is. I never thought his boastful stewardship of the economy was as good as he said it is. But I thought that his raid on pensions could take more years to expose than it has done. I am glad his chickens have come home to roost while he is still Chancellor.
Howard, Chester,
Well well ... I have no sympathy for these poor deluded fools who voted the Labour Party into office (unlike me). Thanks a lot - your stupidity in trusting the utopian promises of Labour politicians has all cost us dear. And they've snarled us up in two nasty wars which we've no chance of winning because they've also raided the Armed Forces war chests to squander billions on the unreformed NHS!! Reap your belief in the failed socialist ideology of spend, spend, spend and meddle, meddle, meddle!
M Graham, Penang, Malaysia
Mrs Johnson from Ayr with her £120 pw pension has undoubtedly earned it having worked all her life but what of others I know who have not, who have made no NI contributions (not because of disability or illness), who actually receive somewhat more than Mrs Johnson due to Gordon's generous rewards to the non-working section of the population? Many independent-of-the-state pensioners have to sell their homes and move away in order to survive. Mr Brown would no doubt consider this yet another fair method of obtaining redistribution and levelling down ........
jane, washington, usa
Chickens are coming home to roost here;don't forget that any of the other contenders will have known about this disgraceful action.There should be a vote of no confidence tabled against this gang of robber barons.
Michael Rigby, Chorley Lancashire, England
Who gave our government permission to dispose of our pension
money like this?Who gave them permission to give themselves a
66% pay rise when we get virtually nothing as well as thsi £10,000
bonus?
Why are nt they required to sign written contracts of employment as
we are?
These people are no better than paid and legal extortionists.
Lets get rid of them now.We dont need any government that does
give all it can to the people.We dont want dictators in this country nor
'spin a web of lies' people either..
adrian dolwe, worcester, uk
What a bunch of moaners! A bit one-sided, isn't it? Something to do, I think, with The Times puffing its own scoop. If you want to publish a more balanced report, please note that I am quite satisfied with my modest occupational pension.
Andrew May, Wimbledon, UK
The Times deserves a medal for breaking this story! Anyone with a private pension who votes Labour at the next election will deserve all they get - or rather won't get.
Brown must now be desperate so here's an idea for him; it might just work. Introduce immediate legislation to move all public sector employees - including MP's - to the exactly the same private pension system the rest of us poor idiots have to get by on!
john goodman, Ashford,
Keith Green said above that you are not going to have enough to live on unless you are in the higher echelons of a big corporation. He forgot that you are also allright if you are in the public sector ....apart from your £1 trillion pension fund being empty, (Their pensions are paid out of new taxation.)
Brian Gilbert, HAMPTON, Middx
I don't think for one second that Brown did not know the full impact his policy would have .However if we believe that he only agreed to it as a result of advice from the Civil Service , why did he not reverse the decision when the full extent of the problem became known ?.
This Government and in particular Mr Brown is in danger of bringing the word " disingenuous " into disrepute .
Is anyone ever in this Government going to stand up and take responsibility for decisions ? I think not !!
Bennett Stevens, Penzance , England
at last, a proper and public debate on a financial scandal that will dwarf any other.
the calculated demise of the much envied final salary pension scheme and other long term consequences for the pensions industry and pensioners are travesties, as are the feeble excuses now coming out of the treasury.
the two year reluctancy to provide the information, the edited black outs in the documents and the sad briefing note provided with it (blaming all but themselves) says it all. many thanks to the times for persisiting with this battle.
e raben, london,
I worry about this man. And he wants to be the next prime-minister?
Mark R, coventry, uk