Robert Winnett, David Cracknell and David Leppard
We've made some changes
to The Sunday Times
THE Sunday Times can reveal details of the alleged plot that Tony Blair’s inner circle hatched to subvert the police inquiry into the cash for honours scandal.
Sources have revealed that Lord Levy, Tony Blair’s chief fundraiser, allegedly asked the prime minister’s most senior advisers to lie to police by telling detectives he had no involvement in the honours system.
A written record of the discussion reveals his suggestion was overruled by Ruth Turner, a senior No 10 aide, who drew up what she believed was a more “credible” strategy.
She allegedly said they should claim Levy was asked for “advice” and “character references” about potential peers. Police believe this might also be misleading because his input was far more significant.
It also emerged this weekend that:
- Jonathan Powell, Tony Blair’s chief of staff, was present at a meeting last summer when the alleged cover-up was discussed. He will be reinterviewed under caution shortly;
- Detectives have recently obtained a new document that is said to be “as damaging” as the Turner memo outlining the “cover-up” strategy;
- The government is set to disband key watchdogs, including the Committee on Standards in Public Life and the House of Lords Appointments Commission, that helped bring the honours scandal to public attention.
A senior Whitehall source said police believed they had evidence to contradict the defence offered by key figures in the scandal. Police are now said to be confident of charging Levy with breaching the 1925 Honours Act, which bars the sale of honours, and with perverting the course of justice, although the final decision will be made by prosecutors.
Police are also understood to be bullish that Sir Christopher Evans, the biotech tycoon who secretly lent Labour £1m, will be charged with breaching the Honours Act amid allegations that he attempted to procure a peerage.
Sources close to No 10 say Blair’s inner circle accepts that the police are determined to bring prosecutions. “This investigation has been going on for a year now. It would be surprising if there were not prosecutions,” said a No 10 insider.
The Downing Street strategy for responding to the police inquiry is contained in a document written by Turner that was selectively leaked last week to cast her in a favourable light.
It is understood that Turner had prepared the memo for Powell but it is not known whether it was sent. She subsequently passed it to her lawyers and the police obtained the document only in January.
Turner’s failure to alert police to the document is understood to have prompted her early morning arrest at her home. Officers are thought to have been tipped off that it had been written.
Last week it was revealed that, in the memo, Turner expressed her concern that Levy wanted her to “shape” her evidence.
However, The Sunday Times has now established the nature of this evidence — Levy’s role in the awarding of honours — and the fact that Turner and other No 10 aides were discussing a far wider strategy for countering the police investigation.
The document was written after a meeting last summer attended by Levy, Powell and Turner to discuss the police inquiry.
A well-placed source claimed the meeting was also attended by John McTernan, Downing Street’s director of political relations.
The source said police had not yet come to a conclusion on the likelihood of charges against the Downing Street aides. The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) said this weekend it had received 11 separate police submissions on the case. The latest police file was submitted only on Wednesday, prompting speculation that it contains potentially new material about Levy’s contacts with Turner, Downing Street’s director of government relations. Levy and Turner have denied wrongdoing.
Three key pieces of written evidence are at the centre of the inquiry, including one that has only recently been recovered by detectives.
Those who have seen some of the documents that form the central focus of the investigation say they are surprised at the apparent naivety of those who wrote them. “I think people were surprised that anyone would be so stupid as to put those sorts of things in writing,” the source said.
The Turner memo is regarded as so crucial to the inquiry that it was the subject of a successful attempt by Lord Goldsmith, the attorney-general, to gag the BBC eight days ago. The injunction was lifted after some of its contents were selectively leaked.
A statement issued by Levy’s solicitors described reporting of the leaked material as “partial, contradictory, confused and inaccurate”. They also called for an investigation by police into the source of the leaks.
The cash for honours investigation began a year ago after The Sunday Times revealed that Blair had secretly borrowed millions of pounds from wealthy businessmen he subsequently planned to honour.
Initially, detectives probed breaches of the Honours Act and electoral laws, but this year they began to investigate whether key Blair advisers had sought to pervert the course of justice.
In January Turner was arrested on suspicion of perverting the course of justice. Levy was later arrested on suspicion of conspiring to pervert the course of justice.
A CPS spokeswoman said the police had given no indication as to when the inquiry would be completed. However, officials have suggested it could last into next month and, possibly, the run-up to the local elections at the beginning of May.
The final decision on whether to bring charges will rest with Carmen Dowd, the senior CPS solicitor who is supervising the case. Dowd is being advised by David Perry QC, a top criminal barrister, who was involved in the prosecution of Jonathan Aitken, the former Tory minister who admitted acts tending to pervert the course of justice in 1999.
The attorney-general has the right to overrule any decision by the CPS to press charges. Sources expect the CPS to take at least two months before announcing its decision.
In another development on the row over standards, it emerged that five watchdogs that have been critical of ministerial sleaze, government practice and appointments are likely to be merged into a “super-regula-tor” on public ethics. They include the Committee on Standards in Public Life and the Lords Appointments Commission.
The plan was inadvertently disclosed by Professor Robert Hazell, an adviser to the Commons public administration select committee (PASC).
The government is confident the PASC will recommend far-reaching change in a report next month. It has refused to renew the contract of Sir Alistair Graham, chairman of the standards committee, before publication.
Other bodies to be merged are the Civil Service Commissioners, the Commissioner for Public Appointments and the Advisory Committee on Business Appointments.
In an academic newsletter, Hazell wrote: “[The PASC] . . . recommended pulling them together into a public ethics commission, to be accountable to, and funded by parliament.”
A spokesman for the PASC called the recommendation a “draft” conclusion that had yet to be agreed.
A Whitehall source said: “The government appears to be using the cover of a PASC report to be abolishing some of their most persistent and damaging critics. These bodies were established to be independent and to draw problems to public attention as parliament had failed in this duty in the past.”
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
See the best entries in this year's competition
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests


Overseas contacts and local business information

2002/02
£59,995
The Midlands
2008/08
£169,950
Scotland
2007/57
£35,000
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
Competitive
CyDen
London
To £28k
Barclaycard
Various (outside London)
£
£40,000 - £50,000 + benefits
Lloyds Pharmacy
Coventry
To £38k
Barclaycard
Northampton/Liverpool
2 Bathrooms, Balcony and Garden
£359,950
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Apts From £249,950
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
It is my belief that in moving the Labour party over to the right to the point where it occupied the same political ground as John Major's government there was always going to be fallout. Some cabinet ministers couldn't make the change (notably Robin Cook), but others found themselves casting away beliefs they had held since childhood. In so doing they corrupted themselves. Their moral compass no longer functioned and they no longer have any real understanding of why they are in government. NuLabour is corrupt by design.
Ryan Stephenson, Swindon, UK
It is surprising the possibility that those funding political parties might receive honours has not also raised the question of party donors being favoured with lucrative Government contracts. Surely now is the time for complete transparency of the business interests, especially those involved with public service contacts, pertaining to major donors.
Dr John Tinsley, Newark, Notts
It is surprising that the "cash for honours" scandal has not provoked the public to enquire into what other favours have followed from donations to the Labour Party. Would it be to think the unthinkable that party donors have been fortunate enough to secure lucrative public service contracts? It would be comforting if the Government could refute this - absolutely.
Dr John Tinsley, Newark, Notts
I must be thick, I cannot under stand that Tony Blair did not know what was going on under his own roof when he was the one giving the peerages,the bus must stop with him in
the end
R Howard, Bucks, England
This ia a Joke..The CPS will make a decision on who is to be charged, but the attorney-general has the right to overrule any decision. It's a joke Goldsmith should not have any involvment in this matter, moreover the CPS should not be allowed to have the final say in such matters whereby they are dealing with cases that relate to their masters ... The UK is now a total Joke. If you or I did this there would be no delay on the part of the CPS, and would would have been jailed.
mark clarke, nottingham,
Sorry, Fay from Florida, but it is not the Police that politicians want "dissolve", it is the Press, like the chaps who brought down that crook Nixon, and the reporters who pursued Jeffrey Archer and Jonathan Aitken (Why are they on our TV screens? Role models?) into court and into jail. Harold Macmillan tried with the Vassall Tribunal, which pilloried the Press. But Regianld Foster and Brendan Mulholland went to jail rather than reveal their sources. They were crime reporters. Their sources were not Church of England vicars,and after they had done their time every copper knew that he could safely give tip offs to the Fourth Estate without endangering his livelihood or his pension. This was the kick-off for Politicians v. The Press, and Supermac had to know that Christine Keeler had not slept with another Tory politician, which she confirmed, before calling in Lord Denning and his whitewash brush. Sadly, the result of all this political skulduggery will be voters not voting.
peter kinsley, london, england
I'm not bored with the saga. I look expectantly for the government's attorney-general to step in and declare any further investigations or prosecutions as "against the national interest" or "a threat to national security". That is what he does, isn't it? That is what Tony Blair keeps him for, isn't it?
E M Sedgwick, Eastleigh, Hampshire
It is very hard to believe, when one sees what is happening all around us, in every walk of life, that this is the country about which Milton once said:
"Let not England forget her precedence of teaching nations how to live"
It appears that what we have now is the case that the "Lions" are being led by "donkeys"! It is nearly impossible to think of anyone whose integrity can be taken for granted?
Anil, London,
I agree with all the comments. Mr Northcroft's in particular, emphasising the effects on British governance of the EU and our closer European ties, is depressing but irrefutable.
Never has a British administration done so much damage to our political structures and morality in so short a time!
Every day we seem to face blitzkrieg, undiscussed, decisions: government by ukaze! Such for example as the abolition of the Privy Council!
And the country is encouraged by the Government to talk and worry about nothing but climate change!
The real sadness is that if our governance is corrupt, incompetent and rotten, we have to ask ourselves if it is all only a reflection of modern Britain .
Robert Sebag-Montefiore, Geneva, Switzerland
The best way to kill president Tony's control of Westminster, as the national parliament, is the deliberate break up of the current political union which no longer gives much benefit to any of its constituent parts.
Scotland would be appear to be creeping ever closer to the brink and the Northern Ireland compromise will not last for ever.
We still be the United Kingdom - as long as the Scots did not invite a Stewart to take up the throne - but not in political union.
The political equivalent of Thatcher's attack on the Unions in th 1980's and for the same reasons - corruption, self seeking and damaging the country
Peter Thomson, KIRKCUDBRIGHT, Scotland
The vast majority of the public are absolutely bored with this saga! The only interested party is the Fourth Estate. The SNP M.P. who had the cheek to start the ball rolling is even fed up with the media attention, although here in Scotland it has undoubtedly provided his party with good publicity before the Scottish Parliament Elections! Blair is going, so who cares! Nothing will change. The two main political parties will continue to tout around for donations for Honours! The S.T. seems to think it is on the brink of another Watergate? Somehow I doubt it? Irrespective of the recent introuduction of Freedom of Information legislation, the U.K. has still some of the the most secretive State apparatus in the world.
Lachie Todd.
Lachie Todd, Edinb urgh, Scotland, U.K.
"Those who have seen some of the documents that form the central focus of the investigation say they are surprised at the apparent naivety of those who wrote them. I think people were surprised that anyone would be so stupid as to put those sorts of things in writing, the source said. "
I think this paragraph just about sums up the fools who have in the past ten have made such a mess of running this country.
Another nail in the coffen, if in deed another were needed!
D Case, Newquay, UK
THe comments from the "former colonies" on this story re-inforce what will become the Blair Legacy. He has brought the ofifce of Prime Minister ,and the government into such disrepute that people now automatically assume politicians - especially on the government side - are duplicitious, self interested and untrustworthy. In such an atmosphere it is almost impossilbe to carry the populace,, crime or be it on war or climate, as nothing they say is credible.
George Edwards, harrogate, UK
I agree with you Bob, but would also like to add that the closer the UK has aligned itself to Europe the more corrupt we have become. Corruption in the European political system is an entirely normal and acceptable way of conducting public life. It is no surprise that an entire generation has disengaged from the political system, only 21% of the Britsh public voted for this government at the last election. What is most sick about all of this are the double standards - the British public constantly being lectured about what is morally acceptable and how to think by this morally bankrupt government. No one beleives a single word they say anymore. They are a disgrace.
Henry Northcroft, London, UK
It is doubtful if even Tony Blair could achieve the sinking of the political ethics in the UK to those of the USA as the previous writer suggests. The cash for honours affair pales into insignificance when compared to Blair's supine duplicity with George W. Bush on the Iraq War. At least nobody has died getting a dubious honour. And ironically, the one successful prosecution this week is that of Vice President's ex Chief of staff, Libby. We need no lessons on political morals from the USA.
R A Connell, Guildford, England
I would not be at all surprised , if the government rushed a bill through disolving the Police
Fay, panama city, Florida ,USA
Ah, we in colonies are pleased to see political ethics in U.K. sinking to the level of those we now have in America. I wonder how many in U.K. realize the coincidence of the plunge in political morality beginning in 1997; a time when Bill Clinton sent his political strategist to England to advise if not direct the Blair campaign that resulted in a historic Labour victory. Sadly, today the influence of that Clinton political philosophy remains ingrained in Labour tactics and strategy.
Bob Evans, Anaheim, California