Siobhan Kennedy and Christine Seib
The man, the films, those blondes. Free DVD collection starting this Sunday
Three leading businessmen yesterday called on the Chancellor to abandon his tax changes on capital gains and non-domiciled residents, in the latest of a string of attacks by the City on the proposals.
Lord Brittan of Spennithorne, a former Home Secretary and European Commissioner, Philip Yea, chief executive of 3i Group, the private equity firm, and Michael Snyder, policy chairman of the City of London Corporation, insisted that the proposals would damage London's ability to compete with other financial centres.
Mr Yea and Mr Synder are members of the Chancellor's high-level group that advises Alistair Darling on City issues.
Their warning came after damning comments this week from Mervyn Davies, the chairman of Standard Chartered, who is a member of the Prime Minister's business council, and Alan Yarrow, vice-chairman of Dresdner Kleinwort, another member of the high-level group.
The business community is piling the pressure on to Mr Darling in the run-up to his first Budget next Wednesday. Lord Brittan said that Mr Darling would find himself in “serious hot water” if he pushed ahead with plans for a flat annual tax of £30,000 for non-doms, to be paid after they have spent seven years in the UK.
Lord Brittan said that the changes to capital gains tax (CGT), which would involve a flat 18 per cent tax introduced in place of taper relief, would stifle entrepreneurism. He said: “The degree of anger in the business community is much greater than the Government had anticipated.”
Mr Yea said that the issue of City competitiveness was too important “to be messed around with on a short-term politic basis ... The Conservatives are as much to blame as the Government is on this. The agenda has become much too politicised and has created the need for reaction and counter-reaction on much shorter timeframes than you would normally expect on such major policy issues.”
However, Mr Yea said that the City's reputation had already been damaged, regardless of whether Mr Darling implemented the planned changes in the Budget.
Mr Yea said: “I think the second that successful policy looks like it might get changed then there is an impact...because the big thing that businesses look for is certainty and up until now the received wisdom was that London was a great place to do business. All that looks a little different now.”
Mr Snyder said that if the Chancellor insisted on pushing through the £30,000 non-dom tax, which is expected to net the Exchequer an extra £500 million a year, he should strip away other proposals that accompany the new tax such, as taxes on capital gains made on UK assets in offshore trusts. “If we got rid of all the froth, it may not be that unattractive a proposal,” he said.
Mr Synder said that he was hopeful that Mr Darling would “clarify” his changes to CGT in next week's Budget. He also called on the Chancellor to abolish stamp duty on share transactions and listen carefully to responses to an ongoing consultation on corporation tax.
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers

Our Credit Clinic has free help and advice
2007
£47,700
2007
£41,899
2008
£41,445
Great car insurance deals online
£25,510 – 32,000
Transport for London
London
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£30k OTE
Meltwater News
Nationwide
100K
Confidential
London
5% below developer pre-launch price!
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Great Homes Available on a shared Ownership Basis
Great Investment, River Views
By Funway – Thailand
from £589pp
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Its a pity that the chnacelor does not want our money here in the UK. I am quite happy to take my funds and the employment that i generate to another more welcoming country. This is shortsited. London has been made a great place to live because of its diversity and its attractiveness as a destination to invest. This is no longer.
Unhappy Non Dom, London, UK
As an employee with a dependency on a car to travel to clients' premises on an ongoing basis, I drive a significant amount through the year - usually between 25000 & 30000 miles - even though I endeavour to use alternative methods such as telephone discussions & public transport where possible.
Revenue & Customs advise me on their website that I am entitled to claim 40p per mile for the first 10000 miles and 25p thereafter tax free - a rate set in law. Given that these allowances have not changed since 2002, is it not reasonable for the allowance levels to have kept up with the cost of operating a vehicle?
For example, in 2006 I could buy diesel at less than 90p/litre and it is now approaching £1.10/litre. It is now effectively costing me money to run my vehicle (when you take depreciation and maintenance due to my high mileage into account) for work related business.
Am I missing something or is this just an unfair tax collection method?
CMC, Stirling,
The more I read about this subject and the individuals who are getting so much media coverage on their objections, the more I begin to realise that there may be good grounds for starting to redress the imbalance of incomes in this country by making them the first target. I see that other European countries are also taking action, in many different ways, to get their wealthier subjects to pay more in tax. At the end of the day there may be no place to hide but the US and I doubt that there is room there, for them all to make such a good living. These people seem to have a lot of power and ways to get at our political masters which makes me suspicious of the relationships.
Alan, warks , uk
What a self centred view from the city once again. The UK tax payer already subsidises non doms. Darling will have calculated the tax income on this item, & he's already in desperate straits with falling tax revenues. So who is going to fill this gap? The uk taxpayer. You city folks have caused the sub prime & many other foollhardy high risk investment strategies, causing chaos to ordinary hard working people. You want jam on your thick slices of bread. Shame on your greed!!
Clive Kitchener, Storrington, UK