Get 20% off your bill at Pizza Express
Britain’s super-rich were under fire last week for using generous tax breaks to pay almost nothing on their profits, but millions of ordinary investors can use the same perks to save thousands in tax on their company-share schemes and even their holiday homes.
The row centres on the use of the lucrative tax breaks by the bosses of private-equity firms – among the wealthiest men in Britain. They take firms private, overhaul them and then sell them on, often netting multi-million-pound profits on which they may pay tax at 10 per cent or less compared with the 40 per cent that many of us pay on our incomes.
The debate has reached fever pitch in the past fortnight as a lineup of private equity’s most powerful bosses have been grilled by parliament’s Treasury select committee.
MPs pounced on comments by Nicholas Ferguson, chairman of SVG Capital, that private equity chiefs paid “less tax than a cleaning lady”. Committee member and Labour MP Jim Cousins said the bosses were part of a “charmed circle of extremely wealthy people” using tax advantages not open to others.
However, he was only half right. The way that private-equity fat cats use the tax breaks is peculiar to them, but all of us can benefit from one of the key perks – a device known as business-asset taper relief that cuts tax on profits from investments.
John Whiting at Price Waterhouse Coopers, an accountant, said: “It’s one of the most generous perks around as it can slash your tax bill in just two years and is easier to take advantage of than many people imagine.
“Workers who buy shares in their employer, including the popular save-as-you-earn schemes, can benefit, as can holiday-home owners. Most investors in farmland, stocks listed on the Alternative Investment Market and small private firms also qualify.”
The savings can be huge. A higher-rate taxpayer who holds a qualifying investment for a year pays 20% tax on any gains, instead of the usual 40%, when it is sold. After two years, he or she would pay just 10%. On a profit of £100,000 that’s a £10,000 bill rather than £40,000 – a £30,000 saving.
The Treasury, which introduced the tax break to encourage investment,estimates taxpayers have reclaimed £6.3 billion in taper relief in the past year. However, many individuals are still believed to be missing out because they are unsure how it should be calculated or don’t even know it exists.
The anger directed at private equity has raised fears Gordon Brown’s successor as chancellor will scrap the perk. But ordinary investors say they would suffer as a result.
John Caines, 58, from Cheltenham, sold his software business several years ago and has invested some of the proceeds in private firms via a syndicate called Hotbed, which pools his money with other like-minded investors. He said: “I like helping young entrepreneurs to push their business forward, but it’s also very risky. Some of the firms I invest in are going to be failures. Without the tax break there wouldn’t be enough of an incentive to take such a risk.”
Investors in syndicates such as Hotbed are not the only ones who would suffer if business-asset taper relief was scrapped.
Company share schemes
In 2000 Brown applied business-asset taper relief to the shares of companies in which you work, to encourage employees to take a stake in their own firms. Millions of people in workplace schemes, including employees at Bar-clays, Orange and Tesco, can take advantage.
Save-as-you-earn plans are one of the most popular, used by about 2m people. If you make a profit on shares acquired through the scheme you will be liable to capital gains tax (CGT) on more than £9,200. However, business-asset taper relief can be applied to the gain to significantly reduce the tax bill.
The perk can be applied to other employee share schemes such as Share Incentive Plans and Enterprise Management Incentives. Even if your employer doesn’t offer a workplace plan, you can buy shares in your company through a stockbroker and still get the taper relief.
You have to continue to work for the company to claim business-asset taper relief on your gains. If you bought shares in your company five years ago, leave or retire now, and sell them in five years’ time only half of your gain will qualify. You will get non-business-asset taper relief on the remainder, but this is less generous.
Holiday homes
Hundreds of thousands of second home owners can also take advantage. While your primary family home is exempt from CGT, profits made on second properties are taxable. By turning your second home into a furnished holiday let, you qualify for business-asset taper relief and pay a lower rate of CGT – though you must adhere to strict rules.
The property has to be available to the public for at least 140 days a year; lettings have to amount to at least 70 days; it must be fully furnished; and must be let at a market price.
The home cannot be occupied by the same person for more than 31 days in any seven months. That prevents student lets from qualifying. These and other buy-to-lets qualify for less generous relief.
Unquoted firms
Another way to benefit is to buy unquoted stocks – shares in private companies that are not listed on an exchange. While the private-equity firms under fire last week have been targeting big names such as Boots, investors who use syndicates such as Hotbed and Beer & Partners take stakes in small firms worth several million pounds at most – which makes them more risky. Syndicates are therefore open only to sophisticated investors.
Most shares on the junior AIM market, such as Domino’s Pizza and Majestic Wine, also benefit from business-asset taper relief.
Farmland
Investors have been snapping up rural land because of the tax perks – one of which is business-asset taper relief. Investors can claim the 10% tax break on any profits from land that is let or contracted to a farming business.
How you can claim the perks
What’s the fuss about?
MPs and trade unions are angry that the top partners of private-equity groups are paying little or no tax.
These firms buy listed companies that have been having a tough time, overhaul them by cutting costs, before taking them back to the stock market and selling them at a huge profit.
A few years ago they mainly invested in start-ups looking for capital, and few people took any notice. Recently, though, they have been borrowing billions of pounds to take into private ownership some of the biggest companies in the world.
Household names that have been bought by private-equity firms include Boots, the AA and Birds Eye.
The taxes paid on the profits are a bone of contention. Although they pay normal levels of tax on their salaries and bonuses, most executives’ earnings come from “carried interest” – typically a 20% share of any profit made when they sell a business.
Special rules mean that this income is treated as a capital gain. Business-asset taper relief rules allow the tax paid to be reduced from the top rate of 40% down to 10% as long as the private-equity firm holds the company for two years before selling it.
How does taper relief work?
Taper relief reduces the capital gains tax (CGT) that individuals must pay when they sell an asset. The longer you hold an asset, the lower the tax rate.
There are two types. More generous rates apply to investments termed business assets, including holiday lets, most stocks on the Alternative Investment Market, and shares in your employer. If you have held the asset for at least one year then only 50% of the profit you have made is taxable. In other words a higher-rate taxpayer pays 20% tax instead of the top rate of 40%. If you hold an asset for two or more years only 25% of the profit is taxed: a 10% tax rate.
Other assets, including buy-to-let and most quoted shares, qualify for the less generous non-business-asset taper relief. You need to have held the asset for at least three years to obtain relief. After that, you pay tax on 95% of the gain; after 10 or more years you pay tax on only 60%.
A higher-rate taxpayer who sold a basket of shares after less than three years would pay £4,000 on a chargeable gain of £10,000: 40% tax. After three years, the bill would be cut to £3,800 (38% tax) and after 10 years to £2,400: a rate of 24%.
Some private-equity fat cats pay tax of less than 10%. Can I do the same?
Private-equity firms can offset part of the cost of their investments against profits, reducing the tax they pay to well below 10%. Private individuals can’t copy this. But there are other ways to cut your CGT bill. Everyone has an annual CGT exemption: in this tax year, you can make tax-free profits of up to £9,200. Married couples can transfer assets between one another to make the best use of each allowance.
Take care if the shares count as business assets. If you hold shares in your company and pass these to your spouse, they will no longer be eligible for business taper relief if he or she doesn’t work for the same firm.
You can also set losses against your gains to reduce tax. If you had gains of £100,000 but suffered losses of £10,000, you would have a gain for tax purposes of £90,000. You usually have to sell investments to register a capital loss.
Is taper relief under threat?
Gordon Brown has signalled he is prepared to do something about the taxation of private equity, but isn’t expected to scrap taper relief. Instead he could revoke the rules that allow private-equity profits to be regarded as a capital gain. If carried interest was regarded as income, most partners would have to pay 40% tax without him having to change the relief.
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£100k
The National Skills Academy for Social Care
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
£75k - £85k
Confidential
London
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
$3.5 million
Also avaliable for rent
Times Online Property Search will help you find it
Amazing Far East Offers - Visit Hong Kong
from £499pp
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I run a business with my fahter and have paid no tax for the past 3 years. It's very easy to avoid having to declare the income and being a recent ex student, I'm not on any tax lists so the money just disappears. THere is nobody in the UK who pays a lower rate of tax than I do - good job as someone has to pay for all the infrastructure etc - Thanks!
Andrew B, Bristol, UK
So your article is presumably about how to perpetrate the same wrong doing as the rich? Anyone fancy putting things to rights or should we all go down the same drain?
T. Bishop, London, UK
There is no obligation for a person to help another. Income taxation is simply a liberal's way to force high earners to help low earners by subsidizing their lives. Such compulsory charity is completely unjust, because no one is obligated to lift a finger to help anyone else.
What we need is libertarianism in its purest form, or anarcho-capitalism. A just world would not require anyone to help another, and we'd have a social darwinistic Hobbesian jungle with a ruthless survival-of-the-fittest form of capitalism. Everyone for himself. Ban welfare, social security, medicaid, and all other social welfare programs that constitute redistribution (i.e. forced charity). All taxes should be replaced with user fees for government services, so that people only pay for the resources they USE, and not for what ANYONE ELSE uses. No one gets more from the government than they pay for, and no one pays more to the government than they receive in return in the form of services. THAT'S fairness.
Ben, New York, USA/New York
It is amazing how, after some one hundred years of socialist policies, the politics of envy are still alive and well. And scheming politicians, and their trade union paymasters, play on this for their own advantage. Why do we let them get away with it.
It is not only super rich (whoever they may be) who obtain taper tax relief. Everybody is entitled to it and benefits from it. They benefit from lower taxes or, more imporant the jobs createds by the tax benefits or the more efficient use of assets.
Whats the problem?
John Harmer, Brentwood, Essex
Peter,
Here we have to cater for swathes of the population who either do not pay tax, or are on state subsidies, or both.
Sorry, mate, this is called socialist capitalism: favour super-rich and the poor.
See you in HK... I am emigrating.
Michele, Richmond, UK
This is not a new problem. The very rich have largely avoided paying direct taxes for many years. The tactics vary; the fact remains.
Instead of dreaming up more and more rules to "stop up" more and more "loopholes"; a losing tactic with the Treasury doomed to be singing always two beats behind the orchestra, I suggest a radical approach.
Simplify the tax system. Fewer taxes, fewer bands, almost no exceptions.
Drastically reduce tax on income or acquired wealth of all kinds, and equally increase tax on expenditure. Scrap VAT (too complex, employs too many unproductively in business and the tax office) and raise the money by an expenditure tax - a straightforward tax on turnover of any business which trades with the public. There should be a single rate and a reasonable threshold as a concession to small businesses - I suggest the threshold should be that where accounts need to be audited.
The very rich who want to live here would find it hard to dodge tax then.
Michael Bruce, Selby, Yorkshire
Instead of losing billions on tax revenues, why don't the UK government just slash its tax rate. I am a Brit working in HK and here, the income tax is just 16%. I have alot more personal disposable income than I used to have back in the UK and I never even consider evading or avoiding my tax because it is already so low. This would also have a positive effect on the economy because it leads to more spending and more profit for businesses.
Peter, Hong Kong, Hong Kong