Elizabeth Colman
Get 20% off your bill at Pizza Express
Borrowers were warned last week that the mortgage payment shock is set to escalate. Some families face having to pay as much as £3,000 a year more for a £200,000 mortgage.
Brokers said the situation was so bad that some homeowners should not bother remortgaging and should move instead on to their lenders’ standard variable rates.
Thousands of homeowners who put down a deposit of less than 10% in the past two years face the double whammy of coming off cheap two-year deals at the same time as house-price falls wipe out any increase in the value of their properties. This means they will be unable to take advantage of better mortgage deals.
Prices fell 2% last month to an average £180,344 — the same level as in August 2006 — according to Halifax, Britain’s biggest mortgage lender.
George Buckley, economist at investment bank Deutsche, said: “The repayment shock for those attempting to refinance two-year fixed mortgages is now huge. Given that a new mortgage approval requires a fresh valuation and that house prices look set to fall below their level of two years ago, homeowners may increasingly drift on to SVRs as two-year fixed-rate deals expire.”
More than 500,000 homeowners put down a deposit of 10% or less when they took out mortgages in late 2006 and 2007, the Council of Mortgage Lenders said.
Fixed-rate loans for those with less than 10% equity have risen 2.15 percentage points, adding £265 a month or £3,181 a year to the cost of a £200,000 mortgage, according to Moneyfacts, the financial analyst — this is double the payment shock that people faced at the start of the credit crunch.
In August 2006, there were more than 100 two-year fixes for those borrowing more than 90% at an average rate of 5.13% said Moneyfacts. Now, there are so few providers that the Bank of England has stopped collating data. This month, just 12 mortgages were available for borrowers with a deposit of less than 10%, at an average rate of 7.28% — considerably higher than the average SVR at 7.08%.
Here we answer your questions.
I bought with a 10% deposit. Any advice?
It’s likely you will have less equity in your property than when you bought. Prices are back to where they were two years ago and surveyors are submitting lower valuations.
Melanie Bien of Savills Private Finance said: “I would advise borrowers with a deposit of less than 10% to stick with the SVR — that way they avoid a valuation that could put them into negative equity. This would not allow them to remortgage at all.”
The cheapest two-year fix from Direct Line at 6.89% with a fee of £499 would cost £34,088 on a £200,000 loan over two years. Two years on an SVR of 7% would be £34,170.
I have more than 10%. Is it as bad?
Last week Halifax cut its two-year fix for those borrowing 75% of the value of the property by 0.57 points from 7.24% to 6.67%. Abbey also reduced fixed-rate deals by up to 10 points for those with a deposit of 25%.
Homeowners who have at least 20% equity are eligible for First Direct’s two-year fix at 5.98% with a £1,998 fee. Monthly repayments are £1,286 against £1,423 on the SVR.
What should I do about my valuation?
Borrowers who are coming up to remortgage can use their savings to increase the equity in their home. This could mean the difference between a rate of 6.67% from Halifax for those with at least a 25% deposit and 7.29% for those with a 10% deposit. This is a saving of £79 a month on a £200,000 loan.
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£100k
The National Skills Academy for Social Care
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
£75k - £85k
Confidential
London
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
$3.5 million
Also avaliable for rent
Times Online Property Search will help you find it
Amazing Far East Offers - Visit Hong Kong
from £499pp
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I am stuffed repossession is what I face now after owing house 15 years its gone up way too much
Steven, leeds, West Yorkshire
Have no sympathy for them. It was a bubble, financed by very dodgy financial "instruments". It couldn't last. Huge numbers of people couldn't afford a house in huge areas of the country. The correction needed to be made. The situation was unsustainable. What's happening now is good. Get over it.
Stephen Edwards, Wokingham, UK
The sole role really of the government is to look after society. This they are failing in, badly. By legislating against BTL investors, or taxing to make undesirable, the government would solve the housing crisis. Simple. This government is corrupt and no longer know the reason for their jobs.
Darren, London,
there can be little doubt that the borrowing ratio will return to the 3.5x multiple. With average uk salary at 25k, the average home will be approx half of current market value. This makes even more sense if you consider how it would increase quality of life for the majority of the working population
matt, bournemouth, I'm
The number of times over the past ten years that bankers have arrived at the door threatening to kill me, my wife and children if I didn't take their cheap credit. I was so recklessly brave in holding out, and has for those of you who who didn't manage? Well you have my sympathy: I was scared too!
Eric Skelton, Cardiff, Wales
In the past two years there have been more BTL 'investors' than 'homeowners' taking out mortgages, certainly in the area where I live. If these people cannot remortgage and have to sell up, well tough, you win some, you lose some, that's capitalism.
Paul, Coventry,
Careers very often dont last 25 years or more as they used to, so I wouldnt be suprised if eventually we find Mortgages settling for say 2.5x salary or lower
Mark Taylor, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire
house prices will return to historical average of 3.5x salary
Geoff Ruud-St-John, Torquay,
Clint, not everyone was stupid enough to live beyond their means prior to the credit crunch.
CoogarUK, Dorchester,
'Borrowers who are coming up to remortgage can use their savings to increase the equity in their home.' Ha ha, great joke, albeit a bit insensitive in the current climate. There's trillions of personal debt in the UK, hadn't you heard?
Clint, Brighton, UK