Win Sky+HD for a year and a trip to Barcelona
Airlines continue to flout European laws over compensation for cancelled flights. Passengers can claim compensation of up to £475 for a cancelled flight, but airlines can avoid these costs if they cite extraordinary circumstances, such as mechanical breakdown or poor weather. There is currently no obligation for carriers to record the reasons for cancellations, which affect about 2.7% of all departures.
Flight-data analyst Hendrik Noorderhaven – whose company, EUclaim.co.uk, pursues passenger compensation claims in return for 24% of the payout – says it is too easy for airlines to exploit the compensation exemption loophole when flights have in fact been cancelled for purely commercial or logistical reasons.
“Currently, the only place a technical malfunction has to be registered is in the aircraft’s logbook,” says Noorderhaven, “but it’s possible to track every aircraft in the world through it’s tail number. So, when an airline says a flight has been cancelled because a specific aircraft has a technical problem, we can double-check.”
Using historical flight data to research claims, Noorderhaven says he can prove where an airliner was at any time and what its flight status was. He cites the case of a Swiss carrier that cancelled a flight from Zurich due to a power failure. “We found they’d given the tail number of a different aircraft – one that had the logbook entry to prove a power failure, but definitely not the plane assigned to the cancelled flight. The airline paid out €250 to each passenger within 72 hours.”
Search for a holiday
e.g. Villa in Tuscany
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
In our new series, Tony Hawks takes a dry, wry look at modern life - junk mail, interminable meetings and snooty sales assistants
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
2007
£30,000
2006
£14,337
2008
£39,937
Great car insurance deals online
c.£75,000
GlosFirstmeansbusiness
Gloucestershire
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
£
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
Competitive Package
Npower
West Midlands
1 & 2 Bed apartments
From £249,995
Great Investment, River Views
Great Dubai Investment Opportunities
from £89,950
low-cost ownership homes in London
Las Vegas SALE!
£POA
With Ramblers Worldwide Holidays!
£POA
Just another "ambulance chaser". Organisations like this one retain 24 or more percent of any "recovery" thus are only suitable IF you have already lodged a claim with airline and have been unsuccessful... A direct approach is best and less expensive..... Frank
Frank Evans, London, UK
I'm not certain I like this. While there may be a few bad apples, do we really want to encourage airlines (i.e. 250 to each passenger) to operate unsafely?
What's in this for EUclaim? I assume they are taking a cut of the 250 - but is the ethical?
Fred Blogs, Newbury, England