Nigel Hawkes, Health Editor
The man, the films, those blondes. Free DVD collection starting this Sunday
Experts claim that shaken baby syndrome has well-defined symptoms that clearly distinguish it from injuries caused, for example, by falling.
When a baby is violently shaken, tiny blood vessels in the brain can start to bleed. The brain becomes bruised and swells. Small bleeds can occur in the retina at the back of the eye, and bigger ones between the membranes covering the brain.
These changes are diagnosed by identifying bleeding in the retina, or subdural haematoma (blood in the brain), or increased head size caused by accumulation of fluid in the brain.
Damage to the spinal cord and broken ribs from grasping the baby too hard are other symptoms. X-ray or MRI scans can be used to detect these changes.
The effects on the baby can be mild or severe, depending upon the intensity of the shaking. Considerable force must be used to cause enough damage to produce the brain changes used to diagnose the condition.
In recent years the theory has come under pressure from sceptics who say that the symptoms supposedly unique to shaken babies can be seen in others who have had a fall, choked on their food or simply suffered an infection.
Since no trials can be carried out to show that the injuries can only be caused by shaking, the usual defence is that the injuries were accidental. Experiments suggest that an impact causes angular accelerations more than 50 times greater than shaking. It is the accelerations that cause the damage.
Those sceptical about shaken baby syndrome argue that retinal bleeding can have several causes, not simply shaking. Jennian Geddes, of the Royal London Hospital, looked at 50 babies who had died and found that 36 had suffered the kind of bleeding in the brain believed characteristic of shaken baby syndrome. Of these, three quarters showed signs of reduced oxygen in the blood. This suggests that a lack of oxygen, caused by infection, asphyxia or choking, can cause the brain to swell, and that bleeding is secondary.
Twelve expert witnesses called by the prosecution
Susan Downes Registered as doctor in 1997. Graduated from Bristol University in 1996. Specialist in ophthalmology since July 1997
Pieter Pretorius Graduated from the University of the Orange Free State in 1993 and registered in July 1995. Specialist in clinical radiology since September 2004
Wilhelm Kuker Graduated in 1987 from the Christian Albrechts Universität in Kiel and registered as a specialist in clinical radiology in 2004
Michael Pike Graduated from the Royal College of Surgeons in 1977. Specialist in neurology and paediatrics since July 1996
Nathaniel Carey Graduated from the University of London in June 1981. Specialist in histopathology from October 1996
Steven Gould Graduated from University of London in 1977. Histopathology specialist since 1996
Warey Squier No record on GMC register
Brendon McDonald Graduated from the University of Liverpool in 1982. Specialist in neuropathology from 1997. Entered GP register in 2006
Jonathan Kay Graduated from Royal College of Surgeons in 1977. Specialising in chemical pathology since June 1996
Neil Stoodley Graduated from Oxford in June 1985 and has been a specialist in clinical radiology since October 1997
Safa Al-Sarraj Graduated from University of Baghdad in 1981. Registered in 1992. Specialist in histopathology since November 1996
Professor Rupert Risdon Graduated from Royal College of Surgeons in 1962. Became a specialist in histopathology in 1996
Source: General Medical Council’s list of registered medical practitioners
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles

A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests

50% off top restaurants, book online

2007
£47,700
2007
£41,899
2008
£41,445
Great car insurance deals online
£33,000
Macmillan Cancer Support
Central/South West
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£30k OTE
Meltwater News
Nationwide
100K
Confidential
London
5% below developer pre-launch price!
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Great Homes Available on a shared Ownership Basis
Great Investment, River Views
By Funway – Thailand
from £589pp
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Has anyone ever filmed a baby in a buggie? being pushed over rough ground?? could other more violent equipment be of significance in this 'SBS', or a baby in a baby pouch being jogged along by over enthusiastic health fenatics?. or a baby in a bouncer fixed in a door frame, leaving the baby left to amuse itself for hours, the impact on its head and neck is tremendous.
Over a period of time the effects of these activities set up the first stages of trauma in the baby's head, then all it takes is a bang on the head caused by, for instance, the baby throwing its head back onto a hard floor, to cause the final trauma.
the use of cheap baby buggies, and other extreme equipment designed to passify babies are dangerous in the long term.
maybe someone should film the effects of these things on the structure of a baby's anatomy before jumping to the conclusion that an innocent carer must have caused the death
once again the experts do not look at extenuating possible causes.
barbara stevenson, wittering, cambs
Is it possible that the GMC changed their registration procedures in 1996? Otherwise not one of those doctors has more than 10 years experience as a 'specialist' according to this information - even though some of them graduated more than 30 years ago!
Oopsie Nigel!
Alice, London, UK
Oh dear, a conviction based on expert medical opinions alone and no other evidence? And the jury was not given a transcript of the Judge's summing up? And the jury did not reach a unaminous verdict and now members of that jury are having serious doubts?
Surely these are grounds for concern, especially as the defendant has impeccable character references. Could the baby's injuries equally have been caused by a fall, and what specifically led the experts to line up and point the finger of blame at the child minder?
The shameful case of Sally Clark comes to mind. Her convictions in 1999 for the murder of two of her sons were quashed in 2003. Sir Roy Meadow, acting as "expert" witness, claimed that two Sudden Infant Deaths in the same affluent, non-smoking family were 1 in 73 million. His statements were challenged later and shown to be based on statistical errors.
Exclusive reliance upon expert witness testimony alone can be very dangerous when the experts themselves disagree.
Rob, Dubai, UAE
There is a case in the U.S. where a person was accused of shaking her son and killing him, but one investigator didn't really believe it and sat on the case. The investigation remained open for years, long enough for her to have another son, who displayed the same symptoms, but THIS doctor, thank goodness, did tests and discovered the baby had a rare congenital disease that causes the same symptoms. Tests were done on tissue samples from the first child. He had the same disease. So the mother had told the truth, after all.
Unfortunately, her older children had been taken into foster care and adopted out. The state (Ohio) has a law that says after a certain amount of time adoptions cannot be reversed.
Lots of "experts" lined up to say she was guilty, too. Had she been arrested in the first case, the truth would never have been learned. She could have spent life in prison.
I'd bet money there is some cause of these symptoms that is not yet known.
Susan, Anchorage, Alaska