JAMES HARDING
Free Elizabeth Arden gift and goodie bags to be won
We Londoners are such a humble, self-effacing lot that it would never cross our minds to mention the unthanked-for kindnesses that we do the people of Britain every day.
But if the provincials get too sniffy about London and those absurd politicians keep on insisting that the Palace of Westminster should be moved to Bradford, then there is an answer: secession.
After all, Londoners give the provinces much more than the provinces give Londoners. The capital generates about £80 billion a year in taxes, and roughly £18 billion of that goes to support the rest of the country. So if Londoners were feeling particularly bumptious, they could start running an advertising campaign to ram the message home: a billboard in Burnley that read: “Your hip replacement — brought to you by the kind, hard-working people of London.” Or a TV ad in Exeter with the voiceover line: “Primary school education for your children — made possible by the diligence and innovation of those selfless people in the City.”
Indeed, we could go further. London has accounted for 20 per cent of the UK’s economic growth in the past decade. And when companies have moved their headquarters to the capital, they have chosen London over Paris or Frankfurt, or perhaps Madrid. They haven’t chosen London over Birmingham or Manchester. The location of big businesses to the City means that back office and auxiliary work is likely to go to some of the UK’s other cities. So there’s another line of possible advertising: “Good morning, Manchester — your jobs courtesy of London’s leadership.”

Of course, this may not go down that well and, having infuriated the country, Londoners may have little choice but to secede and become a city state that continues to operate in sterling while the rest of the country — the manufacturing hub — switches to the euro.
Some outside London may rather like this. They may suspect that they are currently being punished, in higher interest rates and taxes, for the excesses of London house prices and pay rises. And, free of its obligations to the rest of the country, London could finally get on with paying for what it so dearly needs: 1) proper investment in a functioning transport system, which means an upgrade and expansion of the Tube and a commitment to build Crossrail. 2), proper attention paid to the high unemployment rate in the capital and the stubbornly low levels of education in the city. And, 3) more affordable housing. Long live the People’s Republic of London.
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers


Why good girls pay good money for bad-girl baubles

Search The Times Births, Marriages & Deaths
£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£38k
Barclaycard
Various Locations
Live in One of London's Most Vibrant Areas
From £249,950
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Other people have touched on the issue of what is to be done with the nation's heritage that is currently entrusted to London's keeping.
Having read comments on other Websites, it seems to be a popularly held opinion that all UK national treasures currently residing in London, will be kept by the London Republic; a case of theft on an enormous scale.
Similarly it also seems to be assumed that the UK's resources will continue to flow into London unabated. These would be, food, water, gas, electricty, oil, manufactured goods, taxes and approximately 1 million daily commuters. The HQ's of major corporations are based in London although the work is done elsewhere, likewise all the nation's financial insitutions are based there. Independence would see them either moved from London or duplicated elsewhere in the UK, removing London's economic advantage at a stroke. Basically London wants to carry on exploiting the UK (and quite unwittingly it would seem), but give nothing in return.
Ed, Somerset, UK
A curiously biopic metropolitan view: Close the gates keeping the barbarians out and protect 'pax' Londinium! It may be true that London generates significant wealth and therefore taxes. But, it also acts as a huge drain on national resources, natural and fiscal! Not to mention the London centred politics we have to put up with in the rest of the country. Where were you planning on growing your organic wheat? I liked John Prescott's (defunct?) idea of regional assemblies in England and Wales, including London as an autonomous 'city' state under comrade Livingtstone. It may be grim up north, but give us half a chance to manage our own affairs and see who gets the last laugh!
Bob, Lancaster, North of Watford
The resident population of London may only be 7,172,091, but the working population is more than twice that. So, if London only contributes 20% of the economy of a country of 60 million poeple, it would seem that London punches below its weight, not above it.
Matthew, Ringwood, UK
We have the opposite problem in Quebec. We are in the middle of a provincial election. There has been the spectacular rise of the ADQ party from virtually nothing to a real challnge.
Its platform can be summariesed as - how the hell can we get rid of Montreal?
Fancy a swop London. We will throw in a nice city centre mountain and two feet of snow.
Hugh Phillips, Boucherville Quebec, Canada
Having lived in the South East, Scotland and London, I really think that London should declare its independence. Step outside the M25, and it is an entirely different world. In addition, everywhere outside of London hates Londoners. Can't be dealing with all the negativity all the time.
In response to some of the comments, according to the government's results from the 2001 census, the population on London is 7,172,091, not 12 to 14 million. By contributing 20% of the growth of the economy, I believe you could argue that London is punching above its, weight. Not having to pay for the rest of the UK, that money would definitely be doing more, upgrading the transport system.
Lisa, London,
"London has accounted for 20 per cent of the UKs economic growth in the past decade"...
Responding to your headline statistic, Mr Harding, London has a metropolitan area population of between 12 and 14 million people. 20% hardly seems like a disproportionate contribution for a country with a population of 60 million, does it?
Mark, London,
Columnists should encourage us to think - and to think the unthinkable! However you view this article, it broadens your horizons. Well written, James!
A caution, though. The standard, establishment, response to an iconoclasm is to ridicule it as absurd, when what is truly absurd is our tame acceptance of limits on our capabilities; these do exist but should always be questioned and tested.
Call this the satire it is but don't dismiss it for that reason.
Noel Falconer, COUIZA, France
I wish London to have the same relationship with England as Singapore with Malaysia but with a wall around Central London so it can be properly insulated as Berlin was pre-1990 from contamination from West Germany.
It is a cherished dream for London to leave us alone and to enjoy its Civil Service and Quangoes all for itself. It would be so welcome to the nation that I urge all political parties to include it as a referendum question in the next General Election
TomTom, Leeds, England
There's one major, catastrophic flaw in your concept which would make an independent London uninhabitable.
It's called Ken Livingstone.
Anthony, London,
That's a good idea, City State. So we can cancel the new dam in Oxford, London will take care of it's own water problems.
doug, Montego Bay, Jamaica
London is a great city.I moved here from Exeter and it is so different to the rest of the country. However it is so great because not only does it embrace multiculturalism and 'alternative' lifestyles (unlike some other areas of the UK), but it is also the centre of power/sport/and everything else really. It has only got to its great position because of the regions not in spite of it. It will do well to remember this.
Tim, London, UK
To dwell on key issues. Does that mean Chelsea will be kicked out of the English Premier league? How much do you pay for water? I think your army looks quite weak......hmmm! When is this introduced. Can we speed it up?
Keith, Matlock, Derbys.
London is not big and rich because of inate wonderfulness. It's big and rich because it is the capital and seat of power. Everything else stems from that.
When Harding says 'London' he is not talking about the ordinary citizens, but huge corperations, rich international banks, top rank civil servants and the like.
Don't confuse London with Londoners.
Pete, Cardiff,
Why not go further? This London contribution is not, after all, a "London" contribution, but that of a minority of disproportionately high earners based in the City. Why doesn't this contingent secede from the raft of bartenders, checkout girls, minimum wage coffee-pourers, and the London unemployed Harding mentions?
The idea that "London" as a unified entitiy is somehow supporting the rest of the country is laughable.
This article exemplifies the irritating parallel between this London-centric attitude to the rest of England and America's trouble grasping the concept of the rest of the planet. Makes you want to knock on its forehead and remind it that, despite what it would like to think, it is not the only place in existence.
Hannah, LONDON, England
Brilliant peice Harding! Perhaps not someting that should go on the statute books, but does certainly focus minds on what London does for itself and the rest of this country. London is a gateway to the rest of Britain and as such should continue to feed & support the rest of Britain - however there needs to be a balance and greater investment; particularly as James says in transportation.
Mark, London,
London accounts for 20% of the growth in the UK ecomony in the last decade - they also account for 20% of the population - so it sounds like there pulling there weight! Well done!
Rob, Coventry,
I'll give him this, he can make a very subtle joke. This is a joke right?
Nick, London,
London does not have a 'unique and distinctive' identity. It is part of the wider country and heavily integrated with it.
Like myself , most Londoners have family in other parts of the country. I would not accept that my family who happen not to live in London are suddenly citizens of a different country.
Harding's motives seem to be entirely mercenary and would damage both London and Britain.
Peter, London, England
I have lived and worked in London all my adult life, love the place and cannot think of living elsewhere. I have also had the opportunity to work in New York. Whatever the relative financial positions of the two, I think New York has a slight edge. It is less expensive and the standard of service is better. Both the cities are well ahead of the times. They are a showcase of what the world will be in the not too distant future - a melting pot of various races and cultures, working and living together, broad minded and ambitious. I have noticed how an individual coming to London from the provinces or abroad, with their bigoted and racist views, have changed for the better within a year. I do not think London can ever become an Islamic republic, contrary to Julian of WIncombe's view, as the vast majority wouldn't allow that. It is the narrow-minded segregated towns and cities in Yorkshire that produced the 7/7 bombers.
Vinay Mehra, Purley, Surrey
What a good idea. Then they could shoulder the entire funding of the Olympic Games.
Tom Fallowfield, Braemar,
I'd love the South East to secede! I'm fed up with subsidising the regions, cancelling funding of the IRA in Northerm Ireland, and SNP in Scotland would only be the start!
We would however have to make sure we have the SouthEast rather than just London. Quite apart from my address (!) we should listen carefully to Julian, Wincombe:-
"If London became independant I'd give it 50 years before it becomes an islamic republic"
Mike Bibby, St Albans, England -not EU
James, can't resist a second bite.
If you knew a family whose members were anorexic to the point of needing life-support, but the head of the family was morbidly obeise, what conclusions would you draw? If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck...
London's self-obsession is legendary: the last place any country in its right mind would chose for its Capital - except,
perhaps, Liverpool -"City of Culture".
Ken Leyland, Liverpool, U.K.
This is really weak lazy journalism. How long did it take to come up with the concept for this piece? And how long has it been kicking around for? You can practically smell the boring editorial conference. Wake up, this is the Times for God's sake.
Gordon Post, London,
I'd be very pleased if London declared itself a republic, especially if its new government would give me a repatriation grant so I could get out of this overcrowded, overrated, overpriced dump and get back to the north!
Martin, London, reluctantly,
If London became indeendant I'd give it 50 years before it becomes an islamic republic
Julian, Wincombe,
Yes, but what about that tax that allegedly comes from London. BP may well have its HQ in London but the profits it makes are certainly not made there. Similarly Deageo and a host of other PLCs which, for the benefit of their boards, have their HQs in London while the real work is done elsewhere.
Steve German, Kirkcaldy, Fife
I have long felt that London should be a separate entity inside these Brutish Isles. Only when London is free of the rest of us will we see a view arising that is not capital-ised and incestuous; for years we have struggled with the economic impact of London's closer proximity to the world stage. Only recently, we saw the bonuses of the people in the 'City' and could not relate them to our own expectations; London as a city state could be charged with handing back all the artefacts that it has stolen from the rest of the country, under the guise of looking after such things; with London out of the equation, statisticians will not confuse financial norms experienced in the capital as being indicative of a general need; for years London has taken the hard work of others and played with it on the financial markets. When foreigners talk of Britain they refer to 'London' for in all fairness it is the only place in our country with the amenities to satisfy other than our parochial tastes.
Malcolm Turner, Alsager, England
There's a lot about London that I like, some things I don't, and I guess that would apply to most of the world's great cities. Reading the articles - one from an American living in London, the other from a Brit in New York - in Times 2 as objectively as possible, I felt that a better case was made out for New York. Regrettably I haven't yet had a chance to visit the Big Apple, but haven't giving up hope of doing so and deciding for myself which city is better - or whether we could call it a draw.
Barry, Wallington, UK
I'd rather Scotland was fully independent and London got to keep the £10bn or so that goes there. I don't mind supporting the north of England, but there's a limit to these things.
MickJ, London,
Where would the city states boundary be established? M25? home counties? the south east? Would it be possible to exclude Essex? Why can't we leave out anywhere north east of Liverpool Station?
Arnold Ward, Weybridge,
get wid of your notorious criminals,by all means,otherwise your republic is not for the people!!!
ewald widiner, shanghai, peoples republic
James, it has long been apparent to the rest of us that London is another country; that the rest of Britain might as well be in the hands of a foreign power. How else do you think it got into this stripped-out condition? The further you get from London, the poorer the population - until you get to the Irish Republic, the one place in the British Isles not governed by London.
It used to be said of the U.S. that it was the only country in history to go from the primitive to the decadent with nothing in between. Britain has gone from Super-state to tin-pot city state with nothing in between - another first.
Ken Leyland, Liverpool, U.K.
London got to where it is by being part of the UK and in particular the good regulations and the inheritance of empire. Under a leader like Joe Livingstone do you think such regulations as have allowed the city boom would have happened? Also, remember that the 'City' could have financed London transport etc years ago, but has always resisted the taxes. Also, the city is successful, the rest of London is unaffordable to Londoners and the degree of wealth inequality in London far exceeds anywhere except some especially benighted third world countries.
neil murphy, cromer,
Tim - have a look at your next shopping basket: Nothing any of us eat is locally sourced anymore. It would be great if it was, but your supper this evening has probably flown further in a day than you have in a lifetime.
And besides, when we are independent we'll probably keep Brighton as a colony, just for the odd weekend away...
Mikey, Streatham, LONDON
How much is the 2012 olympics costing again?! The only reason they make money and attract business is all public transport in the UK is focused there. Plus, it's a dump.
cameron, cheltenham, uk
I have long believed that Londoners are just as entitled to independence as (say) as the Scots or the Welsh. We have a unique and distinctive identity which is simply too different to the rest of the UK to be ignored.
We have long attracted the best and the brightest British, European Asian, and African talent and Kaiser Livingstone's tinpot regime just doesn't give us a fraction the autonomy we need to determine our own destiny.
Candidly, I'm sick of being told by chippy London-dwelling Scots and Northeners how terrible our city is & I think it would be a worthwhile experiment to see how they all get on without us.
Mikey, Streatham, LONDON
So, grow much food in London, do you?
Tim, Brighton, UK
What a remarkably good idea. (The sort of statistics quoted can always be used both ways). The rest of the United Kingdom would probably be glad to expel London from the Union (and probably the European Union as well?) on account of their capital city arrogance and for being parasites upon the real economic activity of Scotland, Cornwall, Wales, Northern Ireland and the remainder of England. After all, why should everyone else fund London's requirement for a major teaching hospital on every street corner?
Perhaps even the Scottish Nationalists would suspend their policy of independence given that it would no longer be necessary in the changed circumstances.
Apart from the obvious economic benefits to the rest of the UK, just imagine the benefits from the removal of the monolithic state control from London. Even the London (British?) Broadcasting Corporation might even consider life outside the M25 occasionally.
Brian Vallance, LEFKIMMI, Greece