Elizabeth Colman
We've made some changes
to The Sunday Times
HALIFAX, Britain’s biggest mortgage lender, has emerged as the worst offender in a survey of how banks and building societies have treated borrowers in the credit crunch.
It has raised rates on two-year tracker deals by up to 1.15 points since the start of the credit crunch in August – more than any other lender, despite three cuts in official interest rates from 5.75% to 5%.
Halifax’s latest blow to borrowers came last week, when its parent, HBOS, increased rates across the group – which includes Bank of Scotland and Intelligent Finance. Halifax has increased rates five times this year and its latest move raised some rates by 0.6 percentage points.
The move was in defiance of a plea from Alistair Darling, the chancellor, for lenders to pass on the Bank of England’s £50 billion bailout of the mortgage industry last week.
Rates for new borrowers at Intelligent Finance increased by up to 0.5%. Halifax also lifted its arrangement fee on deals through brokers by up to £1,000 to £1,499 in some cases. The move has left the lender open to accusations of profiteering and raised questions about its funding.
Simon Tyler of broker AWD Chase de Vere said: “Halifax is trying to discourage business while at the same time boosting its profit margins. By driving up its rates it ends up making more money from less borrowing. Borrowers have got to seek out better deals if they are out there.”
In August 2007, Halifax was offering remortgagers with 25% equity in their homes a rate of 5.59% for a two-year tracker. Today, the rate is 6.74% – a jump in repayments of 1.15% or £142 a month.
However, Libor – the rate at which banks lend to each other in the money markets and which is used as the basis for trackers – has come down from an average of 6.41% in August to 5.8% this week.
The last time Halifax put up the cost of its mortgages was April 15, the day after lenders were called to Downing Street to discuss getting the mortgage market back on track.
Royal Bank of Scotland was the second-worst offender in our survey by financial data provider Moneyfacts.
The bank, which is seeking to raise £12 billion from investors, has increased the rate on trackers for those with 25% equity in their homes since the start of the credit crunch from 5.49% to 6.44% – an increase of £116 a month on a £200,000 loan.
Borrowers will find little shelter from building societies. The Moneyfacts survey looked at two-year trackers and fixes from Britain’s top 10 lenders as well as Britannia and Yorkshire building societies, for purchases and remortgagers.
Britannia, which was described by Royal Bank of Canada analysts this week as “the Achilles’ heel of UK building societies”, has increased rates on its two-year fixes from 5.69% to 6.54% since August.
A Nationwide borrower with 25% equity would have paid 5.48% for a two-year tracker in August – now they will pay 6.25%, a monthly increase of £93 on a £200,000 loan.
Ray Boulger of broker Charcol said: “There is absolutely no point in remortgaging on to a two-year deal with Nationwide or Halifax when many of their rates are above their standard variable rates.”
While new borrowers and remortgagers have been hit, most lenders are so far playing fair with existing customers – the top 10 lenders have all cut their standard variable rates (SVR) by 0.25% since the Bank of England cut rates this month.
However, 48 out of 99 have still to announce changes, including Intelligent Finance, Yorkshire building society, Clydesdale Bank, Egg, Coutts, Heritable, ING Direct and Kent Reliance, RBS One Account, Principality, Stroud & Swindon and Standard Life.
Bradford & Bingley emerged as the best performer in the survey. It has cut rates on its two-year tracker and fixes since August, and does not charge fees on its fixed-rate deals.
Boulger said: “Bradford & Bingley is able to control the amount of business it does because it lends through branches only. If it was placing business through brokers it would have had to increase its rates a long time ago.”
Brokers said rates were now so high it may not be worth remortgaging at all.
Richard Morea of L&C, a broker, said a borrower with a £50,000 mortgage would be £223 better off on Nationwide’s SVR at 6.49% than if they remortgaged for a year on to HSBC’s lifetime tracker at 5.48% with a £599 fee.
For those with larger loans, finding a “cheap” tracker with no early redemption penalties is a better option for riding out the credit crunch, as discovered by Lindsay and Andrew Millward, of Kegworth, near Derby.
The couple, who both work in marketing, took out a two-year tracker deal with Royal Bank of Scotland in May 2006 at 4.25% – the rate is now 4.75%. They booked a deal at 5.58% with Cheltenham & Gloucester before their term expires on June 1 and will face a £92 jump in their monthly repayments.
Lindsay said: “While the rise in repayments is not ideal, the deal suits us because there are no penalties, so if the market improves and a better deal comes along we can switch.
“In the meantime, it’s a tracker deal so we will benefit from any further interest-rate cuts.”
However, such deals are disappearing fast. Morea said: “The Millwards were fortunate to have secured this deal as it was withdrawn the day after we booked it.”
He added: “Borrowers need to take into account that remortgaging on to a tracker or any other deal in the short term will incur an arrangement fee – you may then have to pay another set of fees if you decide to switch.”
Brokers said last week that they did not expect rates to improve for at least six months.
How the new breed of location based mobile services can find your nearest cashpoint, restaurant or wi-fi hotspot
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Are you California dreaming? Explore the wonders of the Golden State. Also enter our fantastic competition
See the best entries in this year's competition
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

Our Credit Clinic has free help and advice
2006
£189,500
NW England
2008/08
£169,950
NW England
2007/57
£35,000
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
Circa £82,000 per annum
Birmingham Women's Hospital
Birmingham
To £28k
Barclaycard
Various (outside London)
£
Up to £66,000 per annum
Hertfordshire County Council
South East
To £38k
Barclaycard
Northampton/Liverpool
2 Bathrooms, Balcony and Garden
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Dining, Shopping & Riverside Pk
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Andrew Morris did not say what he meant by "heavily invested" in Britannia, but if that meant more than 35K, he should consider moving funds - from any institution in which he holds more than that. 35K is safe. Nothing more.
I don't think it is at risk, but I've left it as its rates are lousy.
Tony Peterson, Kendal,
This is probably not the forum to ask, but does anyone know why Britannia is the Achilles heel of the building societies in the UK. I can't find the report anywhere and I'm heavily invested in them!!
On subject, I think we are on a very slippery slope. We are in for a storm not just a crunch
Andrew Morris, Lymm, UK
Journalism of the tabloid variety! The current ills are symptomatic of a society that wants to live now and pay later - it is interesting that one of the lenders in the "Hall of Shame" has had no problem in finding funds for my step-daughter, who has been frugal and saved a significant deposit.
R Skinner, Ipswich, UK
The BoE/MPI and the government still can't tell me where to place my savings. And with my personal cost inflation running at over 7%, I am pulling savings out of lending institutions. So, I suspect are many other savers.
Welcome to the savers' strike. We will not be exploited by BTL nerds.
Tony Peterson, Kendal,
The situation will not change until the housing market correction bottoms out; at that time and only at that time will we see a change of policy by the Banks.
john, milton keynes,
Ms Colman should have read the Bank of England news release regarding the £50bn scheme which clearly states that one of the three Key Features is that "The swaps ... cannot be used to finance new lending." It couldn't be made clearer. So, what is all this nonsense about "passing on the bail-out"?
Pat Primer, Redditch, UK
Brown has really messed things up in the last 10 years and now he's in charge its getting worse......i really cannot see the UK avoiding a recession with big fallout for all of us. The sooner we have someone in No.10 that can lead and someone in No.11 that can count the better
jim pittman, york, uk
Where exactly has this not insignificant £50, billion gone?It doesn't seem good value for the UK tax payer to me.
stephen hulton, Eure , France