Andrew Ellson, Personal Finance Editor, and Christine Seib
We've made some changes
to The Sunday Times
Britain’s largest mortgage lender effectively shut the door to first-time buyers yesterday by refusing to offer home loans to borrowers without a substantial deposit.
Halifax told mortgage brokers that from Monday it would not lend to anyone who did not have a deposit of at least 5 per cent of the value of their new home. It will also increase rates for anyone with a deposit of less than 25 per cent. Borrowers with smaller deposits will have to pay 0.35 per cent more, increasing the cost of a £150,000 interest-only home by £43.75 a month, or £525 a year.
Brokers said that the decision would make it harder for first-time buyers to find a competitive deal. Andrew Montlake, of Cobalt Capital, the mortgage broker, said: “It is as if the clock has gone back 15 years, when everyone needed a deposit of at least 10 per cent to get a home loan.”
A spokeswoman for Halifax said the bank wanted to reward prudence. “Borrowers with a deposit of more than 25 per cent will find that our mortgages are, on average, 0.1 per cent cheaper from Monday,” the spokesman said. “Approximately 70 per cent of our new customers have a deposit of this size, so they will benefit from this change.”
Halifax’s move came as Skipton Building Society became the first lender to charge £800 for borrowers to take out a standard variable-rate home loan. The decision by Halifax to tighten lending criteria and increase rates arrives after a week of unprecedented turmoil in the mortgage market.
The total number of home-loan products available has fallen by 13 per cent since Monday, with lenders pulling deals that were attracting too much business, or leaving the market altogether. There are now only 4,679 mortgages available, compared with 15,599 at the beginning of July. Estate agents report that as many as one third of all housing deals are falling through as buyers struggle to secure mortgages.
Britain’s banks have tightened their lending criteria significantly after the cost of their own borrowing rocketed as a result of the global credit crunch. At the same time, the collapse of Northern Rock meant that one of the UK’s most aggressive lenders had disappeared from the market. The repercussions of the Northern Rock failure look set to continue to haunt the Government.
In response to criticism that the Treasury, the Bank of England and the Financial Services Authority (FSA) were slow to react to the danger posed by Northern Rock’s financial problems, it is keen to give the Treasury more power to act in a banking crisis.
However, the biggest British banks said yesterday that they would fight the Chancellor’s plans to give an existing committee new emergency powers to manage troubled financial institutions. Instead, the banks may propose a secret traffic light-style system, with high-risk banks put on a red alert. Next week the British Bankers’ Association (BBA) will submit its response to Alistair Darling’s consultation on strengthening Britain’s financial system in the wake of the Northern Rock debacle.
The Chancellor proposed giving power to an existing tripartite standing committee to act “more robustly” in a financial crisis.
But the BBA is expected to complain that the newly empowered committee would not quicken the country’s reaction to a bank run. A source said: “Why bung in another layer of bureaucracy when what we need is speed?” Instead, the BBA is consulting its members on whether to propose to the Treasury a traffic light system, to be run by the FSA.
— European Union finance ministers and the European Central Bank agreed that shareholders would not be bailed out with public money in a cross-border bank collapse.
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
See the best entries in this year's competition
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

Our Credit Clinic has free help and advice
2002/02
£59,995
The Midlands
2008/08
£169,950
Scotland
2007/57
£35,000
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
Circa £82,000 per annum
Birmingham Women's Hospital
Birmingham
To £28k
Barclaycard
Various (outside London)
£
Up to £66,000 per annum
Hertfordshire County Council
South East
To £38k
Barclaycard
Northampton/Liverpool
2 Bathrooms, Balcony and Garden
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Apts From £249,950
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
The article states ' There are now only 4,679 mortgages available', goodness me, isnt that enough to chose from? Anyway, it doesen't matter of there are only 4000 or 400 to chose from, its the terms and rates that matter.
What I found so amazing is the timing of the government's activities, activities which it can control, in spite of the economic situation! So it was known last year that housing problems would probably affect the UK, so why change the CGT rules , which could make the situation for the house owner , as buy to let owners sell, - NOW? When commercial property values are falling, why make changes to regulations concerning paying rates on empty buildings - NOW? Where does this government live - this is not the time to introduce either change, - talk about putting petrol on the flames!
Rita, Mulhouse,
Deposits?-This is how it was/should be, talk about shutting the stable door once the horse has bolted!
The "miracle economy" is over!
steve, west midlands, uk
Halifax is risking the wrath of the Money Price Control (MPC) members because it is flouting government attempts to control the price of money through lower interest rates just like Nixon did in the 1970s with gasoline price controls and Mugabe is now doing with food prices in Zimbabwe. It is really all as simple as Economics 101: if you artificially lower the price of anything, you will cause a shortage because it becomes unprofitable for the sellers. That is why we are having a credit crunch and a hoarding of money by the banks.
anthony, london, england
I have to agree with those who posted before. It was always tradition that a buyer provide a hefty deposit before getting a mortgage. The banks broke that tradition and created the current mess. For them to herald a return to common sense as some kind of wonderful new policy that will reward homeowners is ridiculous.
Paul, Halifax,
It makes the decision about your mortgage easier doesn't it? If you must have one (and it's hard to see why anyone would want one at the moment as we are on the cusp of the biggest housing crash ever seen in this country) go elsewhere. The HBOS HBosses are too busy counting the millions they made on their share killing last week to care about you anyway. Same with the Skipton. When they're facing collapse later in the year they'll rethink their insolent £800 charge, but by then it will be too late, their branches will be derelict. They think they've got the upper hand at the moment. Nothing is easier than to show them they haven't. Don't use them! And withdraw your deposits. If other banks won't lend to them you'd better wonder why. Then when you've wondered, put your money in National Savings - the ONLY place where you stand some chance of ever getting it back. Above all don't listen to advice from bankers - their only motive is sucking you into more debt before the crash,
eric campbell, harrogate, uk
Two weeks ago we were told it was the hedge fund sellers who were to blame for the volatility in HBOS shares. It is becoming clear through acts such as this that HBOS has found it self as a very levered investment vehicle with the largest exposure to US mortgages of any UK bank. Acts such as this prove how short of deposit funding HBOS is as it cant make a loan profitably without it being funded by deposits. The hedge funds couldnt have had that effect on HSBC or Barclays or RBS. It is management who are to blame for £80bn of investments, £200bn of wholesale funding and aggressive growth into commercial real estate. It is management who cant provide the high street banking service to first time buyers and it is management who are responsible for the volatility in the share price.
Macky, London, UK
A spokeswoman for Halifax said the bank wanted to reward prudence.
What !!! it was the banks that got us in this mess, and now things are turning bad they cut & run.
Adrian, Aldershot, England
So Halifax is limiting LTVs to 95% and only offering attractive rates to those with up to 75% LTV. All very sensible. Why did Halifax and other lenders ever breach these conditions in the first place? Ah, of course, the greed of the loan shark.
Paul, Coventry,
Why not have another layer of bureaucracy, after all the government has been hiring an ever expanding army of jobsworths for the last decade. Complete with massive wages and pensions please!
Ian, Bristol,