2 for 1 tickets to Casablanca, this coming Monday
Families who have set up one of the most popular types of inheritance-tax (IHT) saving schemes are being warned that they could be left with an unexpected bill after a landmark court win for the taxman.
Hundreds of thousands of married couples have set up trusts through their wills, known as discretionary will trusts, because they were believed to be one of the few remaining ways to cut IHT on the family home.
However, a ruling by the special tax commissioners means some families will discover their plans are worthless. What many will find most dismaying is that the rule change will be applied retrospectively, hitting schemes set up in good faith. Accountants believe it may also fly in the face of equal rights legislation.
Peter Nellist at Clarke Wilmott, a solicitor, said: “The Revenue is clearly under pressure to maximise the IHT take and is looking for any technical point to drag in as much tax as possible. Any family where a nonworking spouse dies first is in danger of being caught.”
The popularity of will trusts has soared as millions more families have been pushed above the tax threshold. IHT, levied at 40 per cent on the value of estates worth more than the nil-rate band of £300,000, has become a problem for four in ten households, according to Scottish Widows, the insurer. It claims that 10m families, or 41 per cent of homeowners, are at risk as the IHT threshold has failed to keep pace with house prices.
Discretionary will trusts seemed to offer a solution for married couples who wanted to make sure their children’s IHT bill would be reduced.
Take a husband and wife with a £600,000 home. When the husband dies, his wife will have no IHT to pay because transfers between spouses are tax-free. When the wife dies, though, her estate will be taxed at 40 per cent on assets above £300,000 — a tax bill of £120,000.
A discretionary will trust, however, uses both the husband and wife’s nil-rate bands so that the entire £600,000 property is free from tax. But a test case against Stephanie Phizackerley has thrown many families’ tax plans into turmoil. She faces a bill of £60,000 after being told that the trust her parents had set up is useless, even though they seemed to have followed all the rules.
When Phizackerley’s mother died in 2000 the £150,000 value of her half-share of the family home was passed into a will trust to use up her nil-rate band. Under the scheme her husband was able to continue living in the house by owing the trust £150,000. However, when he died in 2002 the Revenue claimed the debt was invalid. As a result the £150,000 that had passed into trust on the mother’s death would be liable for 40 per cent IHT after all.
It argued that because Stephanie’s mother had not worked during the marriage she had not contributed to the share she had gifted to the trust. The Revenue said her husband had paid for it and it could not be used to reduce the value of his estate.
The order of death is important. Had the “working” husband died first, the will trust would have worked fine.
Nigel May at MacIntyre Hudson, an accountant, said: “It’s a ludicrous situation: you are all right as long as you die in the correct order.”
The family do not intend to appeal but Mike Warburton of Grant Thornton, an accountant, believes the ruling could be challenged on the basis of equal rights. He said: “They are in effect saying that because the woman did not work she made no financial contribution to the household, which is a totally out-moded concept. On divorce, for example, it is generally assumed that a couple are entitled to an equal share.”
In the meantime, couples who set up will trusts are being advised to document, where possible, the financial arrangements used to purchase their home. This should include any large one-off payments, for example from an inheritance, as well as income contributions towards the repayment of the mortgage.
HOW THE SCHEMES WORK
- Discretionary will trusts are employed by married couples to use both their inheritance-tax (IHT) allowances.
- You must own your property as tenants in common, not joint tenants.
- Take a married couple with a £600,000 home. When the husband dies, the house will pass to his wife with no IHT because transfers between spouses are tax-free. When the wife dies, her estate will be taxed at 40 per cent on assets above her IHT allowance of £300,000 — a tax bill of £120,000.
- Alternatively, they could draft their wills so that on the death of the husband, assets up to his allowance (£300,000) pass into a trust for the couple’s heirs. To avoid selling the house, the wife would owe the trust the £300,000.
- When the wife died, the trust would call in the loan, which would be deducted from her estate and pass to the heirs IHT-free.
- The remainder of the estate (£300,000) falls within her nil-rate band, so there is no tax to pay — a saving of £120,000.
- Will trusts are different from home loan schemes, which were banned in 2005 because the latter are set up while both of you are alive and so are deemed artificial.
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love.
Have you ever dreamed of owning your own racehorse or a beautiful painting?
Enjoy comfort, safety, space and great design. Plus enter our great competition
Are you California dreaming? Explore the wonders of the Golden State. Also enter our fantastic competition
Do you have what it takes to be a Times photographer?
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
Find out to make the most of your money with our wealth management guides
Need help with your property? We have an entire how to guide - buying, selling, letting, moving, to help you
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
We are seeking entries for the inaugural Sunday Times Best Green Companies Awards
Enjoy some wonderful inspiring wildlife moments
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

Worried about credit card scams? Visit our Credit Clinic for help and advice
2007/07
£57,500
South East England
2007/57
£22,950
The Midlands
2006/06
£41,995
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
£40-55k+benefits+uncapped commission
Morgan Keating
South East
£60k plus excellent benefits
Barclaycard
Stockton / Northampton
£
£55,000 - £75,000 plus bonus and benefits
Diligenta
Based in Peterborough
£45,000 - £70,000 plus bonus and benefits
Diligenta
Based in Peterborough
Globrix, the property search engine
Visit Times Online Property for homes for sale or rent
Residential development site with planning permission
£1,500,000
Mortgages, bank accounts & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Dinarobin Hotel Golf & Spa 7 nights
From £1830 per person – saving £530.
Smart prices on ATOL protected holidays
Excellent online info & holiday selection.
Walt Disney World Resort Florida SALE!
From £619 per person!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
So then , the best way to plan for IHT mitigation is for people to divorce. Thus they will be able to 'claim' their NRB allowance.. without resorting to such Will based arrangements... bet the Church would love that!
Paul Bonnar, Liverpool, Merseyside
I think Stephanie Phizackerley should persue this unfair judgement against her through the European Court of Justice. Of coarse her mother contributed, as a partner in marriage, which entitles her to equal rights. For a Judge to award against her and in favour of the Inland Revenue,if he is married does'nt say much for his relationship.
As for Brown, the so called prudent Chancellor. Since being elected into office during 1997,he has taxed everything possible and in doing so ,what has he really achieved for the Nation?. Nothing but debt upto the hilt. The sooner this lot is ousted the better.
Stanley Green, Colchester, Essex.
Apart from the discrimination of the wifes and mothers who sustain the family home, this chancellor has taxed us in our working life, our pensions, our savings and now our children's inheritance. Now he wants us to accept him and his ways to be our next prime minister. I think not.
G. Wilson, Saltcoats, Ayrshire
This ruling is typical of a government for whom money has become the only significant factor in their attitude to society. This ruling discriminates against a wife who decides to stay at home and bring up her children, saving the state a huge amount because her children will be better adjusted people and give more to the state throughout their lives. Is the government trying to drive wives away from child-rearing into money-making with the long-term aim of reducing risk of IHT? Presumably the next step will be to insist that a non-workjing wife has no right to her husband's asstes on divorce, after all she did nothing financialy to contrubute to them?
M J Clark, Haslemere, Surrey
This government has totally destroyed the motivation for middle income families to remain married, save for a pension, work for childrens education and generally become independent from the welfare state. This ruling is just the type of thing that makes me realise why in fact it is better for me to spend - not save, don't worry about the pension, the govt will foot the bill through welfare, don't bother educating your children - they will end up paying more taxes than ever before if they are successful.
Kirti, Leicester, Leics