Sean O’Neill: Commentary
Win luxury hampers plus Waitrose vouchers & guidebooks
U has been in custody since 2001 without being charged with a criminal offence because for the first four years he was fighting attempts to extradite him to the United States in connection with a plot against Los Angeles airport.
Throughout those lengthy proceedings he was eligible to apply to be released on bail.
When the extradition case was eventually abandoned, he was detained under immigration law as the British Government attempted to deport him to Algeria. The Government can detain someone pending deportation while there is a “realistic prospect” of removal from the UK, and U has now been held under immigration law for three years.
U is one of a number of detainees held under the immigration legislation for whom deportation could breach human rights because they could face death or torture on returning home.
In the case of U, the Government has negotiated a bilateral agreement with the Algerian Government — deportation with assurances — to try to overcome fears that he could be subject to inhumane treatment on return. While being held pending deportation, U can apply to the courts against being held in detention.
The length of time U has been held under immigration laws pending deportation is not the longest. Karamjit Singh Chahal was detained for six years until 1996 while he challenged the Conservative Government’s attempt to deport him.
He was finally ordered to be released by the European Court of Human Rights.
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles

Overseas contacts and local business information
2007
£47,995
2008
£42,945
06/2006
£40,850
Great car insurance deals online
£33,000
Macmillan Cancer Support
Central/South West
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£30k OTE
Meltwater News
Nationwide
circa £70k
Central Office of Information
London
5% below developer pre-launch price!
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Great Homes Available on a shared Ownership Basis
Great Investment, River Views
Visit the ‘entertainment capital of the world’
at great sale prices!
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Robert,
why not lock you instead for a ten years , as you sound a misogynist not fit for society. This is not the movie minority report where you lock ppl in case. If they have done criminal things, lock them up, otherwise you can not lock people up for years and let them go with out explanation.
steve, London, uk
Why do we fear that he could be "subject to inhumane treatment" on return to his own country, when his life is dedicated to causing the death and inhumane treatment to non-muslims?
Who are these people granting this criminal his release and putting the law abiding British public in danger?
Robert, Hull, UK
If he is such a dangerous man, then show the evidence and lock him up. If there is no evidence and just claims then why is an innocent man being persecuted? No one wants terrorists roaming free, but where is the evidence to convict him?
Farrukh, Woking,
Considering how lenient the courts are on serious offenders, anyone they will actually detain must deserve it many times over. Now if only the courts would jail thieves and thugs, it might be safe to walk the streets or leave your car long enough to do the shopping.
Scot, Dubai, UAE