Miles Costello and James Rossiter
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
SRM Global, the hedge fund that is the largest investor in Northern Rock, joined an army of the nationalised bank's small shareholders yesterday in pressing ahead with their legal action against the Government for compensation.
SRM and the UK Shareholders Association have filed an application for a judicial review of the terms offered to shareholders by the Government after it took the Rock into public ownership in February.
After months of preparation, aggrieved Rock investors are preparing to use European human rights legislation and an array of case law to argue that the nationalisation of the bank was illegal and effectively amounted to “misappropriation” or state theft of privately owned assets.
The Government is expected to respond within the next two months. If it rejects the review, all parties will head for the courts.
“You don't go into litigation lightly and you don't sue the Government lightly,” one shareholder said yesterday.
The shareholders have argued that the terms of the Government's compensation plan for Rock investors are “factually and intellectually dishonest”.
The Government presumed the Rock was unable to continue as a going concern and was in administration, they argue. The shareholders say that the bank was solvent, citing the Rock's ability to draw on emergency funding from the Bank of England.
RAB Capital, another hedge fund that is the second-largest Rock holder, has hired lawyers at Nabarro. Legal & General Investment Management, an institutional owner, has declared itself an interested party, which means it may join the case at a later stage.
The Treasury is being advised by Slaughter and May, the City solicitors, and Lord Grabiner QC. The Treasury, charged with protecting taxpayer interests, has consistently argued that nationalising the Rock was its only available alternative and the best way to recoup loans extended by the Bank.
SRM is taking advice from White & Case, the Anglo-US legal giant.
Articles from our sister site WSJ.com:
You may be asked to subscribe to read certain articles
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
NR is apparently going to repay the BoE 'lender of last resort' loans by 2010 so the taxpayer will not lose, depositors funds are guaranteed by the government so they won't lose either, which leaves the shareholders and some 2000 of NR's employees as the real losers - they need to be compensated.
JDR, Durham, UK
Clearly the benificeries of demutualisation/privatisation do not regard their holdings as investments in the conventional sense but as middle-class welfare entitlements. I've lost a fair bit in shares recently. I'm an adult.
Eric Skelton, cardiff, wales
No one traditionally has sympathy for shareholders, however, virtually everyone is a shareholder eg pension schemes, employees, pensioners have lost significant amounts of money. 2000 odd employees will lose their jobs and 1000s of borrowers will be forced to find more expensive loans - is this OK!
Rob, Melksham, UK
I must agree with Craig from B'ham.
The actual value of the shares is nothing, because the company was insolvent. As such, there should be no compensation at all.
Perhaps RAB and SRM can sue their Independent Financial Adviser, for failing to pass on the truism that shares "can go up..."?
Jonathan, Baldock, UK
Join the club. I want legal action over a Government that has shut down down all my local services and taxed me until I squeak. It's called Nulabour, get used to it or vote.
Roger, Surrey,
The shareholders were mad to continue holding their shares after the loan story was first broken. They could have abandoned ship the following day for about £5.50 a share but through greed or naivety they chose not to....entirely their own choice. Stop loss anyone?
Nick, Stockport,
i dont agree.the bank didnt go into administration because the bank of england supported the bank just like the other banks which they have gave 50 billion too.there were also interested parties willing to buy northern rock and the goverment thought otherwise.the shareholders are right to takeaction
stuart, redditch, england
These shareholders REALLY ANNOY ME. They all bought shares in a company, As with ALL SHARES, you can lose your money.
If Northern Rock was not 'Saved' by the Goverment. It would have gone into administration. Then the shareholders would not have got ANY money.
BUILD A BRIDGE ANY GET OVER IT!!!!
Craig, B'ham,