----Nor will it repeal the law that bans the heir to the throne from marrying a Roman Catholic.----

GOOD!

Make the rule apply to all other religions as well.

Dave B, Stoke, UK

Where does one stop though? One might argue that primogeniture is unfair and agist, and therefore the 'best' (how to determine that one!) offspring of the monarch should be next in line for the throne, rather than the eldest. Then you get into arguments over who chooses the best, and an elective monarchy, and soon we have a republic and more problems to sort out.
I'm not against the idea, just think it needs a lot of thinking through about where one stops.

Eleanor, Oxford,

If we had a real democracy, none of these matters would even merit discussion. If our Head of State were elected, their religion, gender, sexuality or accidents of birth would be relevant.
Let's have some real reform, and abolish the anachronism that is monarchy

John Flemming, Scunthorpe, UK

It would be better to consign the whole parasitic carnival to history and abolish the monarchy. That would be a useful first step on the road to true democracy in this country.

Bob Christie, Fife, Scotland

Of course the law favouring male succession should be changed. Far better to do it now, when there are no 'personalities' to consider, than possibly sometime in the future if Prince William has a daughter.

If his first-born is a girl, she should become Princess of Wales.

Donna Walker, Effingham, Surrey