Frances Gibb, Legal Editor
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
Hundreds of state prosecutors could be free to become judges under top-level moves to end a ban on Crown Prosecution Service employees entering the judiciary, The Times has learnt Baroness Scotland, QC, the Attorney-General, and Sir Ken Mac-donald, QC, the Director of Public Prosecutions, are both strongly in favour of the changes, saying that it would make the judiciary more diverse by widening the pool of women and ethnic minority lawyers who could be judges.
Sir Ken, who heads the CPS, said: “I think to exclude prosecutors from the judiciary is increasingly artificial. There are many able people here who would make excellent judges. I am keen on finding a way to achieve this. Of course in other countries – in the States, Canada and Australia – prosecutors can become judges without any difficulty.” At present, Crown prosecutors are barred from becoming part-time judges (recorders) who sit on criminal trials – the first crucial stepping stone to becoming a judge.
The chief reason is the sensitivity about preserving judicial independence from the state and a concern that salaried prosecutors, who have seen cases only from the Crown point of view, would be unsuited to being judges and too “prosecutorial minded”. But growing pressure to make the judiciary more diverse is fuelling the case to allow prosecutors to apply for the Bench.
Women and ethnic minorities are strongly represented in the Crown Prosecution Service: at the end of last month the CPS employed 3,088 lawyers, of whom 1,686 were female. Ethnic minority lawyers make up just under 15 per cent of all staff.
Lady Scotland said: “In terms of diversity, the CPS is an extremely good story.” About 45 per cent of senior prosecutors are women. Just over 26 per cent of chief Crown prosecutors are female, and 15 per cent of chief Crown prosecutors are from ethnic minorities.
She said that she strongly backed efforts that are being made to increase the numbers of women judges, adding: “I am very willing to work with the judiciary and Lord Chancellor to make sure there are as many opportunities for women as possible.”
That included prosecutors being eligible to be judges in criminal trials, she added. “With proper safeguards and training, I hope there will be a way,” said Lady Scotland. Solicitors in private practice who became qualified as higher-court advocates could then become recorders and, from there, trial judges. “But CPS prosecutors don’t have that opportunity and I would like them to.” Those in favour of the move also argue that lawyers who do nothing but defence work can apply to be judges.
They also point to the trail-blazing appointment of a former DPP, Sir David Calvert-Smith, as a High Court judge, although he had first to return to the Bar for some months so that the move was not direct. Soundings several years earlier about his precedessor, Dame Barbara Mills, being similarly promoted were firmly opposed.
The decision will be for ministers. But the strong backing of the Attorney-General is key – although the judiciary also must be brought on side. Sir Ken said: “We would have to secure the confidence of the judiciary, whose views obviously are extremely important.
“But I think the idea that if you work for a prosecuting authority you couldn’t, in future, be a fair judge is undermined by the fact that many barristers who have spent their careers doing nothing but prosecuting have become judges, without difficulty, including Treasury counsel at the Old Bailey. No one suggests that they can’t become fair judges.”
Sir Ken accepted that a key difference is that CPS prosecutors are salaried employees. But he said: “They are lawyers, members of professional bodies, and once they have become recorders or judges they have taken a judicial oath. The idea that they can’t be true to that oath is an odd one.”
The judiciary, he added, should be as diverse as possible – racially diverse, diverse in terms of gender and in terms of the areas of legal practice that people were specialised in.
Articles from our sister site WSJ.com:
You may be asked to subscribe to read certain articles
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
It seems a little dichotomous to say that Crown Prosecutors would be unable to maintain their objectivity should they to become Recorders, when we are quite happy for self-employed Barristers who may have done primarily prosecution work throughout their working lives, albeit as agents for the Crown, are supposed to be able to do exactly that...
I also doubt that many people appearing before HM Judges are aware of their individual practice backgrounds, or even care very much! To many s/he is just a person in a dressing gown and funny wig!
James Weekes, Manchester, UK
On the basic premise of the need for a clear division between the judiciary and the state I can see why many people might have an issue with CPS prosecutors becoming Recorders in Criminal cases. The obvious connotation that is likely to be drawn is that a CPS prosecutor will be more likely to favour the prosecution. Personally I feel this argument does a great disservice not only to the CPS but also to the entire legal profession. Any decent practitioner must be able to be objective about the relative merits of a case if they are to anticipate and counter opposing counsels argument. Nevertheless I wholeheartedly believe that the desire to widen the pool of applicants or secure a more diverse judiciary should always come second to preserving public confidence in the independence of the Judiciary.
Robert Pragnell, LONDON, England
Talking of conflicts of interest. I noticed the other day that Simon Freeland QC (who was for a long time at 5 Essex Court Chambers) is now a High Court Judge and ruling on criminal cases. Now the conflict of interest that I saw/see in that situation is that Mr Freeland has for a long time acted (as does his Chambers as well) primarily FOR many police forces, including the Met and City of London, i.e the Police were his clients. As we know, cases are brought to Court by the CPS on evidence supplied to them by the Police ,and the police are obviously the main driving force behind prosecutions.
Now if Mr Simon Freeland sitting as a Judge has to make any decisions as to whether to side with the Prosecution/Police (i.e. his ex clients !!) or the defendant one could be forgiven for saying that he will obviously favour the police/prosecution.
John, Woking, Surrey
Very sinister indeed.... Why bother making them even resign first, after all their paymaster general can ill afford to lose them can they (or for another wholly innocent explanation / reason of course)...
Alistairs Solicitors, South West, UK
We Can't get the bloody CPS to prosecute anyone with prima facie evidence never mind allowing them to sit in judgement!!!!!
Will someone stop this planet, I want to get off!
Shelly, Durham, County Durham