Helen Nugent
Your last chance to get tickets to Top Gear Live
A senior sales executive who was told by her employer that she would be “useless” after she became pregnant could receive up to £200,000 after winning her sex discrimination claim.
Louise Manning was told that she would “never be the same again” after her boss learnt that she was expecting her first child. He later sent her a memo saying: “Feel betrayed . . . Tempted to dismiss and take the consequences.”
The level of damages will not be set until next month, when the tribunal in Ashford, Kent, will also hear a separate claim that she was a victim of constructive dismissal. Mrs Manning, from Chelmsford, Essex, said after the hearing: “This has stymied my career. I found myself in a position where I had to resign. There was no way I could go back to work.”
Before she became pregnant, Mrs Manning was earning £55,000 a year at Safetell, a supplier of security systems based in Dartford, Kent.
In its judgment, released last week, the tribunal found the firm and its managing director, Nick Medlam, guilty of 24 instances of sex discrimination. It ruled: “It is not often, these days, that the tribunal is faced with such a blatant response to notification of pregnancy.”
The company denies Mrs Manning’s claim of constructive dismissal.
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
In our new series, Tony Hawks takes a dry, wry look at modern life - junk mail, interminable meetings and snooty sales assistants
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
2007
£30,000
2008
£44,990
2008
£48,489
Great car insurance deals online
c.£75,000
GlosFirstmeansbusiness
Gloucestershire
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
£
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
Competitive Package
Npower
West Midlands
Some of the finest Apts & Penthouses
Across London
Great Investment, River Views
Luxury properties within exclusive development in
Chislehurst Kent
A new experience in Luxury Living
Multi–Centre
from Only £829pp
With Ramblers Worldwide Holidays!
£POA
List your property with two leading travel websites
£POA
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - search houses for sale and rooms and property to rent in the UK. Milkround Job Search - for graduate careers in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I have to have some sympathy for the company. Hiring someone who within a few months is off on 2 (almost) consecutive maternity leaves has got to be frustrating.
As a female I am all for rights when pregnant and raising children, but it looks to me like she was milking them for all the cash possible and probably robbing all the other employees of a bonus this year. People/employees need to maintain some integrity/morals, it's not quite a level playing field given companies have no margin for error in their behaviour.
KLE, London,
Er - she was fit for the job, Victor Arram, that's the point. Being a mother doesn't make you unfit for your job. And Gary Horlock - are you seriously suggesting that parents shouldn't work? Most of us need to earn money to put a roof over our heads. If you really think only childless people should be allowed to work, there wouldn't be many people working. Either that, or we wouldn't be having very many children - ie future workers and taxpayers. Not exactly a sensible scenario either way, is it?
NL, Edinburgh,
This womens boss was a fool. There are many ways to tell a person they are not fit for the job.
victor Arram, westcliff on sea, essex
Gary Horlock, I couldn't disagree with you more. Becuase of the evidence in my own life of very successful working mothers and fathers I can only assume that you don't get out much.
Jane, Bath,
I agree with the company. When a woman is pregnant and then has a child then her attention will inevitably divert from work to looking after her child and if she cares more about work than her child then she is not a very good mum. The simple fact is that you cannot be a good mother to a baby and have a good career. So if that sounds sexist but its true, the same works for men.
gary horlock, crawley,
It will be interesting to read whether Safetell are found guilty of constructive dismissal. This case highlights if I may suggest a typified attitudinal ignorance of the role of the pregnant/new mother employee by many small to med employers, whether or not it is voiced ( particularly to the extent that we have just read about) but these situations exist. Its 2008 when are people going to realise what age they are actually living in!!
Mary, Belfast,