Helen Nugent
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
A senior sales executive who was told by her employer that she would be “useless” after she became pregnant could receive up to £200,000 after winning her sex discrimination claim.
Louise Manning was told that she would “never be the same again” after her boss learnt that she was expecting her first child. He later sent her a memo saying: “Feel betrayed . . . Tempted to dismiss and take the consequences.”
The level of damages will not be set until next month, when the tribunal in Ashford, Kent, will also hear a separate claim that she was a victim of constructive dismissal. Mrs Manning, from Chelmsford, Essex, said after the hearing: “This has stymied my career. I found myself in a position where I had to resign. There was no way I could go back to work.”
Before she became pregnant, Mrs Manning was earning £55,000 a year at Safetell, a supplier of security systems based in Dartford, Kent.
In its judgment, released last week, the tribunal found the firm and its managing director, Nick Medlam, guilty of 24 instances of sex discrimination. It ruled: “It is not often, these days, that the tribunal is faced with such a blatant response to notification of pregnancy.”
The company denies Mrs Manning’s claim of constructive dismissal.
Articles from our sister site WSJ.com:
You may be asked to subscribe to read certain articles
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I have to have some sympathy for the company. Hiring someone who within a few months is off on 2 (almost) consecutive maternity leaves has got to be frustrating.
As a female I am all for rights when pregnant and raising children, but it looks to me like she was milking them for all the cash possible and probably robbing all the other employees of a bonus this year. People/employees need to maintain some integrity/morals, it's not quite a level playing field given companies have no margin for error in their behaviour.
KLE, London,
Er - she was fit for the job, Victor Arram, that's the point. Being a mother doesn't make you unfit for your job. And Gary Horlock - are you seriously suggesting that parents shouldn't work? Most of us need to earn money to put a roof over our heads. If you really think only childless people should be allowed to work, there wouldn't be many people working. Either that, or we wouldn't be having very many children - ie future workers and taxpayers. Not exactly a sensible scenario either way, is it?
NL, Edinburgh,
This womens boss was a fool. There are many ways to tell a person they are not fit for the job.
victor Arram, westcliff on sea, essex
Gary Horlock, I couldn't disagree with you more. Becuase of the evidence in my own life of very successful working mothers and fathers I can only assume that you don't get out much.
Jane, Bath,
I agree with the company. When a woman is pregnant and then has a child then her attention will inevitably divert from work to looking after her child and if she cares more about work than her child then she is not a very good mum. The simple fact is that you cannot be a good mother to a baby and have a good career. So if that sounds sexist but its true, the same works for men.
gary horlock, crawley,
It will be interesting to read whether Safetell are found guilty of constructive dismissal. This case highlights if I may suggest a typified attitudinal ignorance of the role of the pregnant/new mother employee by many small to med employers, whether or not it is voiced ( particularly to the extent that we have just read about) but these situations exist. Its 2008 when are people going to realise what age they are actually living in!!
Mary, Belfast,