Adam Sage in Paris
Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition
British law firms face a key hearing in the European Court of Justice this week when French officials will demand hundreds of thousands of euros in social security payments from partners based in France.
The case has provoked a fierce row in Paris, where the press is accusing global giants such as Linklaters of tax avoidance. However, senior partners have angrily rejected the accusations and say they are merely implementing a 1968 Franco-British tax treaty.
Under the treaty, partners in British firms, who often earn several hundred thousand pounds a year, pay income tax in Britain even if they themselves live and work in France.
The British tax regime has been relatively favourable to high earners in recent years, although this is no longer the case after a reform in France this year to reduce the top income tax rate to 40 per cent, as in Britain.
The dispute centres on a claim by the French social security head office, Urssaf, that the partners should pay into two separate funds set up to prop up France’s welfare system. This would add a total of 8 per cent to their tax burden.
With Urssaf looking for backdated payments over up to five years, “we are facing a big hit,” said one senior partner.
A spokesman for Linklaters said: “It is worth noting that the French Government has not supported the demand from the social security office.”
Articles from our sister site WSJ.com:
You may be asked to subscribe to read certain articles
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the collective power of smart thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Flip MinoHD Camcorder
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
42,945
2008
71,450
Car Insurance
Not Specified
MI6
UK-based
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Save up to £1,000 per couple with Elite Vacations at the five-star Constance Lemuria Resort
and do the British Isles this Summer.
Save up to 60% with Oxford Hotels and Inns
Try our inspiring luxury holidays to the Indian Subcontinent and South East Asia.
Great offers available
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
In France, tax is due on world-wide income, whether from investments or earnings, when an individual is deemed to be tax resident. Non-residents are taxed only on French source income and assets. Tax residency is assumed if the individual has a home in France, if it is their principal abode, if it is the centre of their economic interests, or if their principal professional activities are performed there.
Liability to social security payment derive from the same principles.
Establishing non-residence usually amounts to demonstrating that residence has been established elsewhere, and that the normal tests for French residence are not fulfilled. Clearly this is not easy, and it can often happen that a foreign worker has dual tax-residence, at least for a period.
Double Tax Treaties, where they exist, usually sort this out. This is not totally the case here, hence the social security demand for payment.
http://www.solicitor.fr
Fabien Cordiez, Aix en Provence, France
Interesting article, but not very surprising as such. Quite frankly, Linklaters and others in the same situation should've seen it coming, the French welfare state organisation has been collecting left, right and centre ever since the government decided to reduce direct taxation on revenue. In fact, now that the revenue tax office and the welfare tax office work more closely together, I'm surprised it didn't happen earlier. I'm also surprised that the French government isn't trying to levvy wealth taxation (ISF) on those high earning French resident British lawyers who have bought property in France. After all, they try it on with everyone else. Of course, the classical attempt to escape taxation of that ilk was to shelter behind the double taxation agreements signed 40 years ago. Unfortunately, things have evolved somewhat since then, and as always, until the European Union can come to agreement about EU-wide taxation in general, then these issues will keep cropping up.
Alexander Thurgood, Clermont Ferrand, France
well, if they don't want to pay URSAFF then they should go back live and work in Britain. Profit is a higher value in Britain thatr social solidarity, not so in France. In Rome do as the Roman or get out
ulisse leon broglie, suva, fiji
Mr. James figures are correct.
When a french worker earns (gross wage) 100 , his total cost to his employer is 170 (including holidays)
When all his contributions are removed (including super)
he is left with 60 .
A quick glance at any french official form will show you that the french bureaucrats don't give a damn about costs , productivity or the burden they impose the economy.
What future for those who put politics ahead of economics?
Gilbert Pesenti, Talissieu, France
I dont see how payment of the full social security liability will add a mere 8% to the partners tax bills. There is often a lot of confusion about the true cost of these crippling taxes to businesses here in France.
The combined employers and employee ( which is actually paid by the employer ) contributions to CGIS, URSAAF, and
ASEDIC adds a further 73% to an employee's wages. This is quite simply a tax levied to fund the welfare state which, being levied on companies and not the people who benefit from all this doesnt cost the government votes ...
andy James, Lyon, France