Adam Sage in Paris
Win luxury hampers plus Waitrose vouchers & guidebooks
British law firms face a key hearing in the European Court of Justice this week when French officials will demand hundreds of thousands of euros in social security payments from partners based in France.
The case has provoked a fierce row in Paris, where the press is accusing global giants such as Linklaters of tax avoidance. However, senior partners have angrily rejected the accusations and say they are merely implementing a 1968 Franco-British tax treaty.
Under the treaty, partners in British firms, who often earn several hundred thousand pounds a year, pay income tax in Britain even if they themselves live and work in France.
The British tax regime has been relatively favourable to high earners in recent years, although this is no longer the case after a reform in France this year to reduce the top income tax rate to 40 per cent, as in Britain.
The dispute centres on a claim by the French social security head office, Urssaf, that the partners should pay into two separate funds set up to prop up France’s welfare system. This would add a total of 8 per cent to their tax burden.
With Urssaf looking for backdated payments over up to five years, “we are facing a big hit,” said one senior partner.
A spokesman for Linklaters said: “It is worth noting that the French Government has not supported the demand from the social security office.”
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles

Overseas contacts and local business information
2007
£47,995
2008
£42,945
06/2006
£40,850
Great car insurance deals online
£33,000
Macmillan Cancer Support
Central/South West
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£30k OTE
Meltwater News
Nationwide
circa £70k
Central Office of Information
London
5% below developer pre-launch price!
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Great Homes Available on a shared Ownership Basis
Great Investment, River Views
Visit the ‘entertainment capital of the world’
at great sale prices!
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
In France, tax is due on world-wide income, whether from investments or earnings, when an individual is deemed to be tax resident. Non-residents are taxed only on French source income and assets. Tax residency is assumed if the individual has a home in France, if it is their principal abode, if it is the centre of their economic interests, or if their principal professional activities are performed there.
Liability to social security payment derive from the same principles.
Establishing non-residence usually amounts to demonstrating that residence has been established elsewhere, and that the normal tests for French residence are not fulfilled. Clearly this is not easy, and it can often happen that a foreign worker has dual tax-residence, at least for a period.
Double Tax Treaties, where they exist, usually sort this out. This is not totally the case here, hence the social security demand for payment.
http://www.solicitor.fr
Fabien Cordiez, Aix en Provence, France
Interesting article, but not very surprising as such. Quite frankly, Linklaters and others in the same situation should've seen it coming, the French welfare state organisation has been collecting left, right and centre ever since the government decided to reduce direct taxation on revenue. In fact, now that the revenue tax office and the welfare tax office work more closely together, I'm surprised it didn't happen earlier. I'm also surprised that the French government isn't trying to levvy wealth taxation (ISF) on those high earning French resident British lawyers who have bought property in France. After all, they try it on with everyone else. Of course, the classical attempt to escape taxation of that ilk was to shelter behind the double taxation agreements signed 40 years ago. Unfortunately, things have evolved somewhat since then, and as always, until the European Union can come to agreement about EU-wide taxation in general, then these issues will keep cropping up.
Alexander Thurgood, Clermont Ferrand, France
well, if they don't want to pay URSAFF then they should go back live and work in Britain. Profit is a higher value in Britain thatr social solidarity, not so in France. In Rome do as the Roman or get out
ulisse leon broglie, suva, fiji
Mr. James figures are correct.
When a french worker earns (gross wage) 100 , his total cost to his employer is 170 (including holidays)
When all his contributions are removed (including super)
he is left with 60 .
A quick glance at any french official form will show you that the french bureaucrats don't give a damn about costs , productivity or the burden they impose the economy.
What future for those who put politics ahead of economics?
Gilbert Pesenti, Talissieu, France
I dont see how payment of the full social security liability will add a mere 8% to the partners tax bills. There is often a lot of confusion about the true cost of these crippling taxes to businesses here in France.
The combined employers and employee ( which is actually paid by the employer ) contributions to CGIS, URSAAF, and
ASEDIC adds a further 73% to an employee's wages. This is quite simply a tax levied to fund the welfare state which, being levied on companies and not the people who benefit from all this doesnt cost the government votes ...
andy James, Lyon, France