Dominic O’Connell
Your last chance to get tickets to Top Gear Live
POWER companies building new nuclear stations in Britain will have to set up independent “pension” funds to pay for the treatment of waste and reactor decommissioning.
Ministers are expected to give the green light to new nuclear plants this week. The nuclear proposals, together with targets on renewable power and the clean-up scheme, will be included in a draft energy bill, full details of which are likely to follow in a fortnight.
Business secretary John Hutton is expected to argue that new nuclear plants are necessary if the UK is to meet its targets on cutting greenhouse gas emissions and to avoid overreliance on imported fossil fuels. Around 10 stations, sufficient to provide more than one-fifth of the UK’s power, are likely to be built, with construction on the first starting around 2012.
But the go-ahead is likely to spark a judicial challenge from environmental groups. The first consultation document on nuclear power had to be redrawn last year after a court action.
Power companies, however, are eager to press ahead. Several utility groups have registered their interest with British Energy, which owns all the current nuclear-power station sites in the UK.
It is widely expected that the new stations will be built on or alongside existing ones because of the availability of grid connections and the support of locals.
Electricité de France (EDF), the French power group, said it will build four new stations in the UK if the government takes the necessary preparatory steps.
“We want to be first, we want to be fast and we want to be safe,” said Vincent de Rivaz, UK chief executive.
EDF is building a new nuclear station in Normandy.
“This could provide a template for the UK,” he said. “The work in Normandy will be drawing to a close in 2012, which is just when we would like to be starting work on the first UK station.”
The French design being used at Normandy is one of four currently being considered for UK licensing by the Nuclear Installations Inspectorate.
Developers will not be allowed to start construction without a decommissioning and clean-up fund in place.
The funds will be ring-fenced so that operators have no call on the money, and are to be run by independent trustees.
Operators will pay a levy of up to 50p per megawatt hour into their fund – a megawatt hour of electricity costs sells for about £35. Eventually, each station fund will be worth several hundred million pounds.
The trustees will be encouraged to invest in long-term assets such as roads, railways and power stations.
Operators may also be required to seed the fund with a one-off cash payment.
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
In our new series, Tony Hawks takes a dry, wry look at modern life - junk mail, interminable meetings and snooty sales assistants
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
2007
£30,000
2006
£14,337
2008
£39,937
Great car insurance deals online
c.£75,000
GlosFirstmeansbusiness
Gloucestershire
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
£
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
Competitive Package
Npower
West Midlands
1 & 2 Bed apartments
From £249,995
Great Investment, River Views
Great Dubai Investment Opportunities
from £89,950
low-cost ownership homes in London
Las Vegas SALE!
£POA
With Ramblers Worldwide Holidays!
£POA
List your property with two leading travel websites
£POA
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - search houses for sale and rooms and property to rent in the UK. Milkround Job Search - for graduate careers in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Clive will have to blow very hard on windless days! Wind cannot be accepted for base load as it is unreliable.
Maybe his qualifications make him give a blinkered view
James, S'oaks, England
Does anyone know what evidence has been advanced by the Secretary of state for the decision to give the go ahead for nuclear power rather than concentrating on wind power; the numbers not the opinions?
A web link would be most appreciated. Could not find any on the websites at the DTI or No. 10.
Some numbers I have gathered recently show that wind can easily deliver all of UK 's power consumption; about 350TWh/year and provide the base load of about 30-40GW by investing in 2000x5MW wind turbines every year for the nest ten years at a cost of about £12 million per turbine including inter-connector HVDC cables etc.; that is £24 billion per year over ten years.
Harold Wicks, Hemel Hempstead, Herts. UK
"wind farms that will never repay their energy cost" WHAT LIES!!! What NIMBY LIES!! These people come out with this GARBAGE over and over again, WRONG!!!! It takes about 1,000 tonnes of stuff to build a typical 1MW ish wind turbine, most of that is concrete for the foundation, at a carbon cost of about 1000tonnes of CO2 emissions. Thats the equivalent emissions of producing about 1000 Megawatt hours of electricity. if the turbine manages to produce the equivalent of full power for just three hours a day, IT WILL PAY FOR ITS OWN CARBON EMISSIONS IN ABOUT THE FIRST YEAR OR OPERATION, then for the next 25 odd years, the energy is essentially free. Wind turbines are tops! Clive - Engineer, Didcot Power Station
Clive, Didcot, Oxfordshire
Sorry about the previous rant, but people really do trot out the most appalling lies against wind power - is it little wonder the government is having to force through planning laws that will allow the large scale construction of wind farms to get around the lies and propaganda of the anti wind mob, we are going to need those turbines like no tomorrow.
Clive, Didcot Power Station, Oxfordshire
It is only prudent to plan for the future, and although nuclear may have its downsides, it is at the moment a realistic CURRENT proposition, and as such should be initiated in earnest. The forethought of decomissioning is an intelligent muse, and it is only right that it should be paid for by those reaping the income stream from the plants rather than its final owners. until other technologies reveal true winners rather than so called green energy wind farms that will never repay their manufacturing energy costs, or solar that is as yet too inefficient, we are at the mercy of OPEC, I welcome other entrants to the gladitorial ring, and would even support a levy on energy to fund development in to new environmental technologies, buit we do need Energy NOW!
Dominic Tattersall, Burnley, England
Hmm... Investing in long-term assets... Well what will the world look like in 2065 or so when nuclear decommissioning is due to start? If there is any oil around still, how much will it cost? How much will food cost without oil-facilitated fertilizers, pesticides, processing and transport? And when will reserves of uranium be exhausted and how much will electricity from nuclear power plants cost? Today's 'credit crunch' will be looked upon as a quaint blip from the perspective of a world where there is money only for the essentials of life.
We have a few years of relatively cheap oil in which to invest in developing long-term energy assets that will guarantee our society's continuation. Nuclear power is not the correct option and no, it is not a stop-gap. It is investment into a blind-alley and, worse than just a waste of money, it is a waste of vital time and effort.
Mike, Harlow,