Philippe Naughton
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes

Rail passengers are to be hit again by big fare rises in the new year with some tickets going up by more than double the rate of inflation despite the economic downturn.
Regulated fares, which include season tickets, are rising by an average of six per cent from January 2. Unregulated fares, which include most leisure and advanced-fare tickets, will be rising by an average of seven per cent, with some fares going up by an average of more than 11 per cent.
Regulated fares are based on a set formula which limits increases to one per cent above retail price index (RPI) inflation. The bad news for commuters is that the fares for a new calendar year are always set at whatever the RPI figure was the previous July. This year’s July RPI was 5.0 per cent - a figure which has now dropped, too late for commuters, to 4.2 per cent and is expected to fall sharply in the coming months.
Announcing today’s rises, the Association of Train Operating Companies (Atoc) said the increased revenue would help pay for major investment to improve the railways and deliver better value for taxpayers in line with Government policy to reduce subsidy to the railway by 40 per cent between 2006/07 and 2013/14.
Passenger groups reacted with outrage to the hikes, however, claiming they were "unjustified and unfair" and describing them as "daylight robbery".
Atoc said that train operators were currently carrying out work worth more than £800 million to introduce new trains, refurbish existing fleets and improve stations. It added that these measures would benefit passengers through more reliable and comfortable journeys, improved station facilities including more car and cycle parking and better personal security.
Fare revenues and Government grants would also help fund the multi-billion pound investment programme to increase network capacity, which starts in 2009.
Michael Roberts, Atoc chief executive, said: “Passengers in recent years have helped pay for 20 per cent more services, and performance in the first half of this year is at the highest level since records began, with more than 90 per cent of trains arriving on time.
“Yet, since 1996, in real terms, overall rail fares have risen by just five per cent and standard-class regulated fares are actually lower than they were in the year before privatisation.”
He went on: “Record performance and better services have contributed to the highest number of passengers travelling by rail for 60 years. The January fare changes mean that train companies can continue investing in an even better railway and still offer a range of good deals for customers.
“More than 80 per cent of rail journeys are made using either a price-regulated or discounted ticket. And with the real costs of motoring up by over 25 per cent since 1996, rail will continue to be an attractive option for millions of people every day.”
However Passenger Focus, an independent consumer watchdog, said it was wrong to impose such hikes when commuters were facing tough times in the economic downturn.
Chief Executive Anthony Smith questioned why passengers should see their fares increase when inflation had fallen significantly and was expected to fall further next year.
“These fare rises hark back to a time of high inflation and spiralling energy costs,” he said.
“The economy is different now, but the seemingly unstoppable rail price express ploughs on. Fare rises way above inflation are unjustified and unfair.”
He said the government needed to look again at linking fares to inflation and said rail company’s investment and performance should also be taken into account. “We cannot simply go on dumping costs onto the passenger in this way,” Mr Smith said.
Gerry Doherty, leader of transport union TSSA, said the rises made a "mockery" of the Government's pledge to help hard-working families through the recession.
“Ministers should have cancelled this annual inflation-plus increase if they were serious in helping people just get to work, let alone keep their jobs," he said.
“As it is they have allowed the rail companies to increase fares regardless of the standard of service they provide. This is a licence to print money and it should be stopped.
“If every other business is cutting prices, why should the rail companies be allowed to get away with daylight robbery?”
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
You wouldnt mind the 8% hike in prices by southeastern if the serivce was any good. Its getting worse! poor value for money. Excuse after excuse!
S Culver, ME10, UK
It's now cheaper for me to drive the 175 miles to my boyfriends house than take the train!
Freya, Cardiff,
Kerri. Why don't you drive if it is so much cheaper. this is typical British winge culture.
Ally, London, UK
They do it because they can. Imagine the reaction of the French to this; that's why it never happens there, only in the UK.
David Masu, Zürich, Switzerland
You can't expect politicians on expenses to care.
Neil McF, Southampton, England
And they wonder why people are still using there cars! make it reliable and at a reasonable price and people would use it
Paul, stafford,
To Barry, Wallington - What about those of us who work standard office hours and therefore have no choice but to travel at peak time? Why should we be forced to pay more when the standard of service we receive is invariably lower than that received by off-peak travellers?
Kelly, Malton, N. Yorks,
Pity the users of the Hastings - London line run by Southeastern. They are getting clobbered with the full 8% rise to pay for new high speed ('Javelin') trains, even though the trains will never run on this particular line, and will only serve Kent
Richard, Bexhill, UK
JT.... More people than ever before are using the train so the price per person should drop... exactly, funny how the price would DROP if less people used the trains ...( ex pat now living in Brazil)
Patrick Dunphy, Joinville, Brazil
The rises that many of us pay will be far more than this. Anyone that parks at their station will experience a huge rise in parking charges, in my case of over 20% each year. This makes the true fares increase far bigger than these published rates. If you live miles away then you have no choice
C Bell, West Horsley, Surrey
"Public transport is a service and should therefore not be run at a profit."
Just because something is a service there is no logical reason why it can't make a profit?
Hairdessing? Restaurants?
Alex, York,
"How come European trains are so cheap?"
In Switzerland you can get an annual ticket that allows you to use any train and bus, countrywide and at any time, at the cost of 1600 pounds (1100 for a second member of your household). And trains are mostly clean and on time. It is possible!
roger, London,
An "attractive" option? I have NO option - I live n Colchester and work in London. It costs me £3,740 at the moment and the trains are always late, and often full. Every day there is a litany of excuses - signal failure, track failure, broken down train, leaves on the line, wrong sort of snow.
Liz, London,
No problem! With more congestion charges coming in why not go for it?
Simon, Manchester, UK
For a while recently I travelled daily by train to and from London, very comfortably. How come? I was visiting my wife in hospital and able to travel off-peak. We'll go on getting these whinges every year until people spread their travel times or we taxpayers fork out for costly capacity increases.
Barry, Wallington, UK
The problem to my mind is the pathetic lack of planning shown. I use the trains on all sorts of routes almost every day and overcrowding is horrendous. Awarding the service from the S.Coast to Edinburgh to Virgin was the most ridiculous - the trains have always been far too small to cope.
Tanya, Derby,
There's only really one action to take on this if you are angry at the rail companies continually putting up their fares - BOYCOTT!
If you continue to pay and travel then they'll continue to raise the price. A small revolution is needed or the cost of living will continue while standard drops.
Marcus, London, England
the only thing about a petrol price of £30 is you have failed to consider road tax, maintenance and insurance. typical aberdonian view - penny pinchers! public transport is still far cheaper than using private transport.
Stephen , Perth, UK
this is absolutely disgraceful train fares are high enough! Labour should put more effort into helping train use become cheaper and more easy to use!
Harry, bury st edmunds,
"Record performance...".
Rail authorities define a train that arrives at its final destination 9 minutes overdue as not being late.
They've also increased the overall length of time for most commuter rail journeys.
It's all a con.
AndyH, Middlesex,
More people than ever before are using the train so the price per person should drop. Inflation is now dropping, so surely the price should drop. Mr Roberts says that 90% of trains arrive on time (a train has to be an hour late to be "delayed") so less refunds, so drop the price!
JT, St Albans,
I drive a 2 litre sports car (a "gas guzzler" I imagine the tabloids would call it) to work, and it's cheaper than the train. So bravo, we're doing great in this country to reduce dependancy on cars and foreign oil.
Tony, Islington, London, UK
I pay £3, 345 a year to travel from Bedford to London - The trains are unrelible, dirty and the overcrowding is so severe that passengers are left standing on platforms, it's an outrage! With fuel going up rail travel should be made more attractive! yet its significantly cheaper to drive!?!?
kerri fitzgerald, Bedford, England
1999 - GNER Berwick to London £48.95 return
2008 - NXEC Berwick to London £135.00 return
Public transport is a service and should therefore not be run at a profit.
Tim Murray, Berwick,
So you increase fares on public trasport at a phonominal rate, and you then bring in plans such as congestion charges in Manchester & Salford. However the result is not significantly better service nor better roads. i'd prefer no extra charge and no improvements.
Sun, Coventry,
How come European trains are so cheap and efficient and the UK ones so expensive and inefficient? Maybe the providers should look to them for some new ideas.
Sarah, MH, Albion
My train is a very tight squeeze every morning . More people are forced to use the trains into London as local government policy is to make it expensive to use alternative transport. Its time for train companies to give back to the pax and also be sensitive to the economic climate.
Marc, London,
Until they can make me feel safe at a station in the evenings I will continue to use my car. simple as that. my personal feeling of safety comes first.
Martin, Southend on sea,
Disgraceful and not value for money for the long suffering commuter. On the Thameslink line you rarely get a seat, the trains are often dirty, and the 0715 from St Albans has run late every day this week! Surely the service should visibly improve before fare increases can be applied to the customer.
ML, St Albans, UK
And my season ticket has just gone up by just shy of 10% (not going anywhere near London). So the "average" increase hides massive divergences (my increase is a little over twice the current RPI, almost twice that in July). So much for the planning ahead I did, based on RPI + 1% as advertised.
JS, Cambridge,
aberdeen too edinburgh, £35, return £36. Petrol cost in car £30. is it any wonder no one wants to use public transport?
liam, aberdeen, scotland
How is it, the commuter has to pay through the nose, but if you want to go on a return trip between London and Edinburgh, is cheaper than the commuters daily fare for travelling one stop up the line!
Gary Sykes, Berwick upon Tweed,