Christine Buckley, Industrial Editor
Over 900 restaurants nationwide. Find your nearest now
Royal Mail’s pension deficit has soared 25 per cent to £4 billion and is likely to jump further after an actuarial review next March.
However, half-year operating profits of the state-owned organisation more than doubled to £177 million, only six months after it said it would need a big cash injection because of a declining market and increased pension costs.
In the six months to the end of September, postal volumes fell 4 per cent, leaving the daily postbag at 79 million items, a drop of five million on two years ago.
Referring to its pension deficit yesterday, Royal Mail said that there was “an urgent need to tackle this major challenge”. The postal group is hoping for help from the Government, although it had a large injection for pension servicing as part of a £3.9 billion rescue package last year.
Lord Mandelson, the Business Secretary, this week told MPs that he is considering extending the terms of the Hooper review, which is looking at the challenges facing Royal Mail and his recent remarks have revived talk of a part privatisation.
Yesterday, Royal Mail said: “We face additional risk from the squeeze in the UK economy and from the drive by both businesses and individuals to cut their costs. Royal Mail is particularly vulnerable to a downturn in the advertising market.”
Much of the improvement in the group’s letters division and its Post Office counter network has come from a reduction in overheads and changes to working practices.
Adam Crozier, the chief executive, said that Royal Mail’s universal service obligation — its duty to send non-bulk domestic and business mail anywhere at a flat rate — was loss-making. He said that although there had been “huge effort” across the organisation to improve profitability, “we are also facing huge pressures, with the universal postal service still loss-making, competition intensifying still further both from electronic communications and rival operators, and the increasingly heavy costs of servicing the historic pension deficit”.
Royal Mail’s letters operation recorded operating profits of £46 million for the first half of its financial year, compared with a £5 million profit for the same period last year.
Its Post Office division moved to a £28 million profit, from a £7 million loss. Royal Mail this year has been closing 2,500 post offices, leaving a network of just over 11,500. It said the programme was nearing completion.
Royal Mail said that the future of the Post Office Card Account, the Government’s no-frills banking service, was of critical importance. The Department for Work and Pensions has yet to decide whether the Post Office will retain the business or whether it will go to a rival operator. It is feared that if the Post Office does not get a renewed contract, thousands more post offices could close.
Billy Hayes, the Communication Workers Union general secretary, said: “The results demonstrate that Royal Mail can make a profit while remaining a public service.
“We expect the Government to ensure that such good results are supported by retaining Royal Mail as an integrated and wholly publicly owned service.”
The moment your toes touch the sand and your gaze meets water, you know you’re in the Bahamas.
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2005 / 55
£59,500
Great car insurance deals online
Circa £60,000
The Army Benevolent Fund
London
C£100K+
Chronophage
Isle of Man
12-15 days a year, c £12K
Springboard
London
£Competitive
American Airlines
Heathrow, London
Great Investment, River Views
One and Two Bed Apartments
Wandsworth Town
Times Online Property Search will help you Find It
like nothing on Earth!
.
Must end 28 Feb 2009!
Save up to 25%
Amazing Far East Offers
Visit Malaysia from £755pp
Great travel insurance deals online
.
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
The problem is rural deliveries. There is no way they can cover their costs in outlying areas. Why not charge postage by Post Code? Surcharges for rural areas - perhaps double or more. A one pound letter would still be a bargain.
Colin, shrewsbury,
It is not rocket science to see why the service of letter loses money, all one sees are Royal Mail vans wandering around the streets with ONE letter.
Central pick up points are needed we are no longer in the era of the Penny Black.
Graham, Bolton,
If the Royal Mail's universal service obligation is loosing money then emails must be a blessing rather than the otherway around if the small letter cost more to deliever than the postage paid on them,
Ernie Goody, Haverhill, UK
The Post Office Card Account is crucial. It enables Post Offices to provide banking services and is essential for rural communities.
Keeping local post offices reduces traffic and energy consumption.
Bank + post office together makes a lot of sense.
Alistair Nicholls, Manchester, UK
For how many years did The Post Office/ Consignia/ Royal Mail enjoy a pensions contribution "holiday"? And was it not the government, as chief share holder, who made this deciscion and created the present deficit?
Phil Green, London, UK