You need Flash Player 8 or higher to view video content with the ROO Flash Player.
Click here to download and install it.
Over 900 restaurants nationwide. Find your nearest now
Airlines were urged yesterday to implement safety measures to reduce the risk of ice restricting fuel flow, after the crash of a British Airways jet at Heathrow earlier this year.
A report, the fifth to be released by the Air Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB) into the incident, concluded that the crash, on January 17, was probably caused by ice within the fuel-feed system.
Now the AAIB wants aviation regulators to introduce interim measures for all Boeing 777s powered by Rolls-Royce Trent 800 engines to prevent a similar incident. It also wants watchdogs to consider the implications of the findings for other types of aircraft and to ensure that fuel systems can cope with the potential build-up and sudden release of ice.
The crash was the most serious in the 12-year history of the Boeing 777 and the most serious incident at Heathrow for 30 years. Passengers were flung forward when the BA flight from Beijing skimmed the perimeter fence and shuddered to a halt 400 yards from where it first touched down, and in less than half its normal minimum landing distance when using full braking power. One person suffered a broken leg and eight others received minor injuries.
BAA, the airport operator, closed the runway and diverted dozens of flights, including the Prime Minister’s chartered British Airways 747, which was left stranded at its departure gate.
It later emerged that the crew on the Beijing flight were unable to get the required thrust from the engines as the jet made its approach. John Coward, 41, the co-pilot, took control for the landing. By 200ft the airspeed had reduced to about 108 knots and the autopilot disconnected at 175ft.
Yesterday the AAIB concluded: “The investigation has shown that the fuel flow to both engines was restricted — most probably due to ice within the fuel-feed system. This ice is likely to have formed from water that occurred naturally in the fuel whilst the aircraft operated for a long period, with low fuel flows, in an unusually cold environment.”
Although investigators said that they had ruled out problems with fuel quality or quantity or mistakes by the flight crew, they found abnormal marks on the high-pressure fuel pumps from the engines. They said that these were formed by a phenomenon called “cavitation”, which is caused by a restriction in the fuel flow to the pump.
Aircraft are designed to cope with significant amounts of the ice crystals that form in fuel when they climb into sub-zero temperature zones. However, tests on a Trent 800 engine of the type fitted to the BA jet showed that restricting fuel flow to the high-pressure pump caused a similar effect to that recorded in the accident.
Investigators noted that the BA aircraft encountered very low temperatures en route from China, but comparison with flights on other routes showed that they were not unique.
However, the flight was exceptional for the length of time the fuel in the main tanks had stayed below 0C, as well as for the low fuel-flow demands while cruising and the high fuel-flow demands in the final approach to the Heathrow runway.
A spokesman for BA said: “There are no safety recommendations specific to British Airways. We will work closely with the relevant regulatory authorities and comply with any requirements issued to all operators [of the aircraft]”.
The AAIB’s final report into the BA crash landing will be published at a later date.
The moment your toes touch the sand and your gaze meets water, you know you’re in the Bahamas.
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2005 / 55
£59,500
Great car insurance deals online
Circa £60,000
The Army Benevolent Fund
London
C£100K+
Chronophage
Isle of Man
12-15 days a year, c £12K
Springboard
London
£Competitive
American Airlines
Heathrow, London
Great Investment, River Views
One and Two Bed Apartments
Wandsworth Town
Times Online Property Search will help you Find It
like nothing on Earth!
.
Must end 28 Feb 2009!
Save up to 25%
Amazing Far East Offers
Visit Malaysia from £755pp
Great travel insurance deals online
.
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I still think that this is a possible 'homologation' issue between the engine controllers (RR Trent) & the airframe controllers. If ice in the fuel were such an issue have the AAIB tried to replicate the problem? AAIB will have to find the definitive answer to this puzzle -peoples lives are at stake
sean duffy, dunboyne, Ireland
The 5th report from the AAIB was very comprehensive but however raises some intriguing questions. Never before did they mention that the co-pilot disconected the autopilot or selected flap 25 (from flap 30)for landing. Why did they hide these facts which they must have known from the beginning?
chris, briare, france
Ice in the fuel!! What a "cop out"! The 777 together with hundreds of other models have been flying at severe icing altitudes for at least 50 years. What was special about this flight and why did it all happen just before touch down? How much fuel was left after the crash? I
John Haylor , Valencia, Spain
Was this Boeing 777 used almost exclusively on the London to Beijing route with a daily rotation between the 2 ? Airlines believe fuel uplifted in Beijing has a notoriously high water content. If true is likely that the fuel in the tanks had become increasingly saturated with water !
Francis Small, Guildford, UK
So, nothing to do with the electronic jamming devices in Gordon Brown's car; which was driving near the perimeter fence as the plane was coming into land then?
Either way though, all credit to the pilots!
richard, aylesbury, uk
The co-pilot landed the plane because it was his responsibility. A co-pilot is still a pilot you know? However, there can only be one captain (who you referred to as a pilot) on each flight.
Marcus McAdam, Guangzhou, China
All planes at high altitude have very cold temperature. The specification of the fuel is obviously too wide if the water content can cause this problem. Either dry the fuel in situ or tighten the spec. to make certain the water is not there. Its not difficult.....
bob taylor, castelnau, France
One broken leg in 30 years - that's a pretty outstanding safety record for Heathrow!
Bill, Ramsey,
This is a cover up! If there was fuel still in the tanks which punctured when the aircraft crashed why didn't it catch fire? Did BA put less reserve aboard and run out due to higher than expected headwinds? Burning fuel to lift extra fuel is expensive: deadweight rather than payload (load that pays)
Greg, Toulon, France
"Prime Ministers chartered British Airways 747"
Why on earth did he need to charter a 747?
Kevin, Workington, Cumbria
Alex from London, the first officer landed because he was designated to fly the landing on that particular flight. Loss of power happened at a very late stage of the approach and exchange of control could have complicated matters for too many reasons to list here.
Andrew, Hamilton, NZ
The pilots did very well to get the thing down safely, but why did the co-pilot land the plane rather than the pilot?
Alex, London,
Once again we need to thank those pilots for their professionalism and raw flying skill.
Ian Smith, Sotogrande, Spain