David Robertson and Miles Costello
Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition
Heathrow's profits rose by more than 10 per cent last year, despite the UK's largest international airport coming under repeated criticism for its poor service and standards.
Accounts for the private holding company that owns BAA, the airports operator, show that Heathrow's operating profits rose by £40 million to £438 million in 2007.
Profits at Stansted rose 68 per cent to £86 million after BAA doubled the charge for each passenger using the airport.
The sharp rise in profits angered airlines who use BAA's facilities.
They claim that the company is making huge profits but is failing to offer a good service. Heathrow, in particular, has faced repeated criticism for long security queues and the poor quality of its infrastructure.
The rising profits will provide airlines with further evidence that BAA is abusing its position as the owner of London's three main airports.
The Competition Commission is expected this month to deliver its preliminary findings on whether BAA's London monopoly should be broken up.
Jim Callaghan, the head of regulatory affairs at Ryanair, said: “BAA is abusing its monopoly position by charging outrageous fees while providing a rubbish service and that is why they can enjoy huge profit increases.”
BAA was bought by Ferrovial, the Spanish infrastructure company, in 2006 through a subsidiary called Airport Development and Investment Limited (ADIL), which filed 2007 accounts with Companies House last week.
The ADIL figures show that revenue for BAA's seven UK airports, as well as Naples airport in Italy, was £2.2 billion, up 7.9 per cent from the previous year. The company made profits of £745 million, up 13.4 per cent.
The accounts also show that ADIL is reducing the amount that it spends on new infrastructure at Heathrow, despite BAA's claims that it is working to improve the facilities.
Capital expenditure was £875million last year compared with £977million in 2006.
BAA said yesterday that this was due to reduced spending on Terminal 5 as it neared completion.
However, Ferrovial has been unable to reap the full rewards of BAA's big profit increase because of enormous interest payments on the debt taken to finance the BAA acquisition.
ADIL was able to pay Ferrovial and its other backers only £86 million last year after interest payments of £964 million.
ADIL's total debt stands at £16.9 billion and Ferrovial has been unsuccessfully trying to refinance in order to reduce the interest payments.
If it fails to refinance within the next two months, BAA's credit rating is likely to be moved to junk status.
Ferrovial has sold World Duty Free and part of its property portfolio in an attempt to reduce its debt levels.
The criticism of Heathrow's profits comes as British Airways faces its own problems at the airport, particularly the recent chaotic move into its new home at Terminal 5.
Standard Life Investments, BA's second-largest shareholder, has begun a series of meetings with senior executives at the airline.
It is understood that Standard Life will meet Willie Walsh, BA's chief executive, today having spoken to Martin Broughton, the chairman, yesterday.
The problems at Terminal 5 are thought to be only one of a list of issues that will be raised with management.
The meeting comes as investors are becoming increasingly alarmed at the bad news coming from Britain's flag carrier.
The T5 debacle followed a profits warning last month and shareholders are concerned that a malaise has started to set in at senior management level.
“We need to be sure that BA is prepared for a deteriorating operational environment. The economy is turning down and fuel costs have turned up,” a shareholder said.
BAA money-spinners
Airside shops
(not including Duty Free)
£74 million (+8.4%)
Landside shops and bookshops
£48 million (+0.3%)
Restaurants and cafés
£60 million (+3.6%)
Bureaux de change
£57 million (-1.3%)
Car parking
£164 million (+5.5%)
Car rental
£22 million (+5.3%)
Advertising
£36 million (+5%)
Full-year 2007 figures
(% comparison with previous year)
Source: ADIL accounts
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the collective power of smart thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Flip MinoHD Camcorder
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
42,945
2008
71,450
Car Insurance
Not Specified
MI6
UK-based
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Save up to £1,000 per couple with Elite Vacations at the five-star Constance Lemuria Resort
and do the British Isles this Summer.
Save up to 60% with Oxford Hotels and Inns
Try our inspiring luxury holidays to the Indian Subcontinent and South East Asia.
Great offers available
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Surprise, surprise.
A monopoly cuts back on investment in infrastructure and service and it makes a profit.
Please can I have one?
Bill Peter, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Something wrong somewhere. Foreign company comes along, no experience of running airports. Makes bid financed almost entirely on loans. Can't afford to finance debt, whacks up charges, so customers are effectively financing this private buy-out. Less investment in facilities, and poor service, combined with higher charges, and damage to London's reputation in particular. Loser = British travelling public and UK economy. Time to break up BAA, there is no reason for one private company to have such a monopoly
Richard, Bexhill, UK
Have you been to T5 ? it is like a massive glossy indoor version of Knightsbridge with shops most people could never afford to buy in and expensive restaurants selling distonctly average food - there is a vast mass of open space and miles to go between everything - oh yes and of course the huge queues still to get through security, overcrowding problems at the satellite gates B and C (with constant tannoy announcement asking passengers not to leave the main building on the 20 minute trek to their satellite gate until the flight is called) and evidence of the usual BAA standards telling you that within a few months the place will be as grubby and poorly kept as all the other horrible little shopping dens it calls terminals spread across Heathrow - it is a borderling criminal money making monopoly which is plain for everyone using it regularly to see
Bryan, Totland, UK
So we are to understand that they cut investment to make more profit at a time when the airports are looking like poor third world relations of mainland European airports - and when Terminal 5 is a joke...
This is what happens when you have foreign private ownership of essential infrastructure and utilities - they have no moral and social desire to ensure that they provide a good service - rather, much like the energy companies - they seem to be hqappy to make profits at the expense of the British consumer.
Paul Singh, London, UK
Nationalize. Same service, but the profit stays in the public purse.
T Eastwood, Guildford, UK
And we all wonder were all the extra profit came from. BAA: lets build more shops, and ignore the passengers who have to make do with awful waiting areas and other public services. Nice one.
Adam Watson, Belfast, UK