Marcus Leroux
Win tickets to the ultimate village fete with welly wanging and more
BAA, which has a monopoly on operating Britain's largest airports, has been criticised strongly by the Competition Commission today for overcharging airlines and failing to deliver acceptable levels of passenger service at Heathrow and Gatwick.
The regulator said that BAA, which was bought this year by Grupo Ferrovial, the Spanish construction group, in a debt-ladened £16 billion deal, charged passengers more than its levels of service justified.
It said that the airports had "acted against the public interest" by failing to manage security queues to avoid "unacceptable delays to passengers".
The authority said that it had seen no improvement in performance in the past five years.
BAA is already under pressure to be broken up.
In a separate inquiry the Competition Commission is investigating whether BAA should be allowed to continue as the monopoly operator of the largest British airports.
In its report today, the watchdog stated: "In our 2002 report we found that [Heathrow and Gatwick] had pursued a course of conduct contrary to the public interest by failing to make prices paid sufficiently reflect the level of service provided.
"We have seen no reason to believe that there is any case for a relaxation of the current SQR [service quality rebate] condition and we consider that it should continue in force and that some standards should be raised.
"We consider that [Heathrow and Gatwick] have displayed the same failings in the last five years.
"In particular they have failed to manage security queueing and queue times to avoid unacceptable delays to passengers and flights and consequently have not furthered the reasonable interests of the users of Heathrow and Gatwick."
The regulator recommended that the amount that BAA charges airlines per passenger be capped at £10.96 for Heathrow and at £5.48 for Gatwick in 2008-09, rising from £9.26 for Heathrow and £4.91 for Gatwick in 2007-08.
An increase in the landing fee that BAA charges airlines for using its airports will feed through to higher ticket prices.
The fee is charged for every flight, and is based on a complex formula involving carbon emissions, the type of aircraft and the number of passengers on board.
The commission proposed that charges at Gatwick should fall in real terms over the next five years.
Charges will increase by no more than 7.5 per cent above inflation for each of the next five years at Heathrow, while at Gatwick prices must rise by 0.5 per cent below the rate of inflation.
The report has brought the Competition Commission into conflict with the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA), the primary economic regulator for airports.
The CAA apparently is unhappy that it has to go to the commission for a second opinion on changes to its price-capping regime.
The CAA said that it intended to consider the commission's report in the coming weeks, before issuing for consultation its own firm price-control proposals for Heathrow and Gatwick by Nov 20.
All parties would then be able to submit further written evidence to the CAA during a two-month consultation period. The report follows a six-month inquiry by the Competition Commission.
BAA criticised the commission's proposals. Stephen Nelson, the chief executive officer of BAA, said: "We see little in the [Competition Commission's] report which delivers the incentives to transform the airports. Nor do we believe that the CC recognises the scale and nature of the challenges we face in seeking to deliver a step change in the passenger experience.
"At a time of increased complexity and risk in the UK airports sector, the CC is proposing at Heathrow — a dramatic reduction in returns."
Airlines are also displeased, because they say the price cap is too high. British Airways pushed for increases in line with inflation.
Tim Bye, deputy chief executive of bmi, Heathrow's second largest airline, said: “We warned the CC that sanctioning inflation-busting price rises at Heathrow could have a devastating effect on vital regional services into Heathrow."
In March the CAA recommended a cap for Heathrow of £10.29 in 2008-09, with annual increases of 5.8 per cent above inflation, and maximum Gatwick charges of £5.19 in 2008-09, followed by increases of 1 per cent above inflation.
The CAA said that differences between its proposed caps and the commission's price-cap projections were as a result of the "larger capital investment programmes now in prospect at each airport and the costs of delivering more stringent security processing".
Ferrovial, the owner of BAA, said that the report would jeopardise its attempt to reduce the airport operator's debt.
It said: "These proposals introduce a high degree of risk that the refinancing plans in the form developed over the last year might not be able to be implemented as currently envisaged."
Ferrovial plans to refinance about £9 billion of BAA’s debt, as well as debt taken on buying the airport operator last year.
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers

Overseas contacts and local business information

Find a course, arrange a game and save money
2002/02
£59,995
The Midlands
F/1989
£36,000
Hollingworth At Ombersley
2007/57
£35,000
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
90K plus bonus plus options
Confidential
London
To £28k
Barclaycard
Various (outside London)
£
£40,000 - £50,000 + benefits
Lloyds Pharmacy
Coventry
£38k
Barclaycard
Various Locations
Live in One of London's Most Vibrant Areas
From £249,950
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Please help petition the government to act on the CC recommendations at http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/BAAService/
Sam Wardill, London, UK
Break up BAA!
They encourage you to fly from there and buy before you fly, but try and take a drink, or sun cream thru for a child (as luggage goes missing on such a regular basis you need it in your hand luggage), bought from the shops out front, and it's "oh no you can't, buy another inside". Same with anything else. Their staff are rude, unhelpful, and just plain disagreeable.
End their monoploy NOW.
L. G., London,
As a frequent traveller to Europe, (I live in Vietnam), I have made a point of avoiding entering the UK through any of the London airports unless absolutly unavoidable, in the last four years.
The standard, especially Heathrow, of cleanliness, customer care, service, etc etc is really third world!!!
I am ashamed when I see visitors expressions and experiences of entering the UK.
I do hope at long last that BAA get their come uppance, they do not deserve to carry on with this monopoly.
The recent additional moans and groans are just the final straw, but I can assure you this situation is not new, it has just been magnified by the current anti terrorist problems.
It's time for change!!!
DAB, Saigon, Vietnam
What planet is Stephen Nelson , Chief Exec of BAA on??? Lets give him a real incentive to improve passenger service, take the airports away from BAA. And leave the company to find another way to pay off its debt.
Heathrow is a national disgrace, and its not just security queues. Nice shops ( they seem to find the money to spend on those!), but, whooops, another bag gone missing.
Me Avoids Heathrow, Manchester,
I realize we are a small fish in a large ocean but still after run our aviation business competitively.Based at Manchester airport a well respected flight training operation we are faced with a 480% increase over all other average passenger runway charges.Average passenger costs at Manchester are approx. 3.24 against light aircraft under 2 Ton 15.80 average. Training aircraft 25.00 + 5 ATC student charge.
The CAA don,t want to know, the airport are not interested sod the future pilots and the public interest.
After 30 years we would like the consideration as every other airfield user.
Anyone out there to help the little guy.
John Patterson, Manchester,
Tell me again why charges can go up by 18% at Heathrow and 12% at Gatwick in spite of the stinging comments?
Jo, London,
By Ferrovial's own statement above, they appeared to have bought BAA to play games at settling debts of BAA & their own debts in buying costs. !! Not to improve customer relations, efficiency ; most of all to enable the senior executives of both the parent & the subsidiary companies to award themselves massive undeserved bonusses
The layer underneath smacks of the usual capitalistic greed at the cost of human lives, comfort of passengers ( their customers ) and total disregard to human rights even in business ethics.
Jyotish Ganguli, Hildenborough, United Kingdom
My son and my two young grandsons queued at Stansted security that they, along with a significant number of other passengers, missed their flight. Because they had checked-in on time with the airline the carrier rejected an offered opportunity to book on a later flight for a nominal charge, offering instead a new booking at total cost over £600.
I wrote to BAA pointing out that, while other security queues had two working scanner machines, theirs had only one - but that this only became apparent when they had almost reached the head of the queue. (All other queues had moved faster but they had joined the shortest at the time. No one likes to risk hopping from one line to another.) In fact some of their fellows actuall sat on the floor because they advanced so slowly.
BAA did reply - eventually - with a virtual admission that things are beyond them, but they offered no help with the additional costs which arose due to their mismanagement.
Karl W Smith, Heckington, UK
"Ferrovial, the owner of BAA, said that the report would jeopardise its attempt to reduce the airport operator's debt."
Is this the £16 billion debt which they took on to buy BAA, which wouldn't be there otherise. Who allowed a monopoly company to be bought in a debt laden manner? This means that the resulting cost of buying the company is passed onto the passengers who have no choice but to basically pay for Ferrovial's purchase of BAA. Why do we allow vital businesses to be bought in a massively indebted manner? No wonder our infastructure is falling to pieces all the investment money is paying of the interest on the debt.
A N Noyed, London, UK
The service at facilities are below par. Its great having these findings, but will something be done about it?
hamad Lone, Expat-Brit, Middle East
- 1
- 2
Next