Dominic O’Connell
The man, the films, those blondes. Free DVD collection starting this Sunday
BAA has begun lobbying for a full-length new runway at Heathrow ahead of the expected launch next month of a consultation document on expansion of the London airport.
The move represents a switch for BAA, which has in the past advocated only a short extra runway, suitable for the small aircraft used on short-haul flights.
A full-length strip – Heathrow’s existing runways are full-size at about 4,000 metres – would allow more flights by larger, long-haul aircraft.
BAA declined to comment, but industry sources confirmed the change in policy. “They are pushing hard on a full-length runway – which I find difficult to understand. I think it is because they think, possibly rightly, that getting any new runway at Heathrow is going to be a monumental battle, so they may as well go the whole way,” said one executive.
The government is expected to publish a consultation document on the expansion of Heathrow next month. This will cover proposals for more flights on the airport’s two present runways, and for a third runway.
Both plans are expected to be bitterly opposed by local residents and environmental groups. Heathrow was last month the scene of a “climate camp” at which green campaigners gathered to protest against aviation’s contribution to global warming.
The consultation is the result of a government white paper on the future of air transport issued four years ago. It said that while there was an economic case for expanding Heathrow, it could not proceed until local air-pollution issues were addressed. Stansted was chosen as the location for the southeast’s first new runway.
Meanwhile BAA has appointed Merrill Lynch to conduct a review of the future of World Duty Free, its airport retail business.
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles

Overseas contacts and local business information

Find a course, arrange a game and save money
2007
£47,700
2007
£41,899
2008
£41,445
Great car insurance deals online
£25,510 – 32,000
Transport for London
London
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£90,000 + PRP
Essex County Council
Essex
100K
Confidential
London
5% below developer pre-launch price!
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Great Investment, River Views
By Funway – Thailand
from £589pp
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
The DfT, BAA and particularly BA have been partners in a concerted attempt for a long time now to play down and where possible to ignore the noise and pollution effects aviation and especially Heathrow have on people distant as much as 20 miles from Heathrow. The list of cynically broken promises by the DfT and successive governments has made it clear that only airline and airport profits count with them. Their economic arguments are based on unprovable statements about the way passengers will behave if Heathrow and other airports are not expanded and the failure to tax aviation properly has concealed - as it has been meant to do - the real cost of flying. Counter-arguments about the lack of need to expand airports are ignored.
David Franklin, London, UK
Madrid has recently opened TWO new 4000m runways )for a smaller airport( and Spain is proposing 10,000km high speed rail, and is still building lots of motorways - kind of the same thing as the french and germans are doing, Schipol has 5 runways...am I missing something?
mark, london, uk
A third full lenght runway should be built at LHR as soon as possible. The airport shoud be connected to a full rail service and linked to LGW as well as national rail services UK wide.
R Helmn, Reading, UK/Berks
Whilst any third runnaway is needed quickly, a full length runaway could have nasty effects on regional transport. Originally, the third runaway would have been shorter, to allow short-haul airlines in, and UK destination to get more flights in. bmi have exploited this market recently. A full-length runaway will mean only more long-haul, more lucrative flights, good for BAA, but what about the British economy?
Ed Fry, Southsea, Hants
Never mind all this silly talk. BAA is a business and to grow the business, they need new runways. Just build the new runways and get on with it. To much talk and not enough action.
Ian, Grangemouth, scotland
The report from "Greengauge 21",2006, on the provision of a high speed rail link between "inter alia" Heathrow and Birmingham, Manchester and further north ,deemed that a 3rd runway would not be needed. Interline passengers would use the HSRL rather than short haul flights. Unless the rail and air interests get together to provide such an integrated system we could end up with both HSRL and a 3rd runway! So much for Green thinking!!!
M.N. Jamieson, Windsor, Berks, England
The case for a full third runway at Heathrow is overwhelming. The Government has however to recognise the dislocation and disturbance issues will require an unprecedented package for re-housing and compensation of affected residents and businesses. The cost of this will still make a 3rd runway the most sustainable, environmentally friendly and economically attractive of any alternative. London is simply too big a world city and financial capitals demand good access. It cannot be compromised any longer by its main airport's inadequacies. Any alternative will only increase journey times and make for far more and longer road and rail connections or connecting flights from provincial airports.(including those purporting to be London airports) The capacity has to be provided closest to the source of demand. It is high time this country stopped the wingeing and carping small mindedness and showed the rest of the world that we can provide world class infrastructure.
Alastair, Rye,
There are lies, damned lies, and what Spanish-owned BAA has promised about not wanting a third runway at Heathrow if it got T5. A full length runway will stretch from Harmondsworth through Sipson and Harlington and will end up in Cranford Park. The amount of residential and agricultural land will be 10 times more than for a short cuddly runway that BAA first mooted. The pollution will make Hayes a desolate wasteland. At least four historic churches will be destroyed and 100s of thousands of homes will be compulsory purchased and bulldozed for this crazy expansion. 'Monumental battle' is an understatement. The Climate Camp brought activitists together. They are now networking for the fight ahead at all levels. The Climate Camp was only a small start. The coming battle could see the complete collapse of this less-than-green Government.
C.J.Brady, Harlington, UK