Rhys Blakely
The man, the films, those blondes. Free DVD collection starting this Sunday
Comment: Jobs is shifting blame, not championing consumers
Apple has called on the music industry to abandon the controversial digital rights management (DRM) technology that underpins the legitimate online music market and protects tracks from being copied by internet pirates.
Such a move would allow any song to be played on any device, marking a radical break from the current system where tracks purchased from iTunes, the company's online store, are embedded with Apple's DRM system and only work with the group's iPod music players. Other music players such as Microsoft's rival Zune also use unique DRM standards.
In a rare open letter posted on the group's website, Steve Jobs, Apple's chief executive, said that ditching DRM is "clearly the best alternative for consumers, and Apple would embrace it in a heartbeat".
He added: "Imagine a world where every online store sells DRM-free music encoded in open licensable formats. In such a world, any player can play music purchased from any store, and any store can sell music which is playable on all players ... If the big four music companies would license Apple their music without the requirement that it be protected with a DRM, we would switch to selling only DRM-free music on our iTunes store."
The apparent change of heart comes as Apple, which has sold 90 million iPods and more than 2 billion tracks from iTunes since the launch of the service in 2003, faces fierce criticism across Europe for locking users into its FairPlay DRM system. The Norwegian authorities have ruled that Apple must open access to iTunes by October or face legal action.
Record company executives and other technology groups such as Cisco have already called for Apple, which accounts for up to 80 per cent of the online music market, to open up FairPlay. Apple has so far resisted those calls, claiming last year that a proposed French law to make music DRM free would represent "state-sponsored piracy".
In his letter, Mr Jobs again ruled out licensing FairPlay to competitors, arguing that the industrial secrets behind the technology would be leaked over the web, rendering it useless.
Mr Jobs is not alone in calling for an end to music DRM. Dave Goldberg, the music manager at Yahoo! has made repeated calls for labels to remove the restrictions. Last year, Yahoo! offered a handful of DRM-free tracks from artists including Norah Jones.
However, it is doubtful whether calls to ditch DRM altogether would win substantial support from Universal, Sony BMG, Warner and EMI, which control the distribution of more than 70 per cent of the world’s music.
Some groups have suggested that Mr Jobs's calls for an end to DRM constituted an effort to burnish Apple's image with music lovers frustrated at being hamstrung between incompatible systems.
The Electronic Freedom Foundation, the online consumer rights body, said it "agreed wholeheartedly with Jobs". But it added: "As a first step in putting his music store where his mouth is, we urge him to take immediate steps to remove the DRM on the independent label content in the iTunes Store. Why wait for the major record labels?"
That sentiment was echoed by bloggers who suggested the Apple boss was posturing to garner positive PR. "Apple is positioning itself on our side in the war against DRM... but I'm left feeling that surely there's more Apple can do to fight DRM than to simply give a hospital pass to the record companies?" the readwriteweb.com site said.
Jon Johansen, widely known on the web as "DVD Jon" for his record of cracking copyright technologies, including Apple's, said: "It should not take Apple’s iTunes team more than 2-3 days to implement a solution for not wrapping content with FairPlay when the content owner does not mandate DRM. This could be done in a completely transparent way and would not be confusing to the users. Actions speak louder than words, Steve."
Online music sales doubled to about $2 billion (£1 billion) last year, accounting for about 10 per cent of industry sales, according to figures from the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry.
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles

Overseas contacts and local business information

Find a course, arrange a game and save money
2007
£47,700
2007
£41,899
2008
£41,445
Great car insurance deals online
£25,510 – 32,000
Transport for London
London
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£90,000 + PRP
Essex County Council
Essex
100K
Confidential
London
5% below developer pre-launch price!
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Great Investment, River Views
By Funway – Thailand
from £589pp
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
DRM is quite rediculous. If I buy a CD I can take it to my friend's house and play it on their system.
With DRM I have to have a different player depending where I buy the song.
I remember the "home taping is killing the music industry" campaign in the 70s,
I hasn't killed anything, it's simply the music industry having a 21 century moan.
Also, if a friend had a new album in the heady seventies, I'd tape it. If I liked it I would go buy the album to have the origanal with the art work and maybe buy another by the same group.
Home taping helped EXPAND my musical taste and lead to hundreds of new record buys by me.
The truth of the matter is you haven't really bought the CD/DVD/download, You've taken it on a life long rental and it is restricted to which machine you play it on, but you weren't really told that, and to use it your computer often has to connect to the net each time you play/watch? Pain if you only have a modem connection and there are plenty of areas even in UK that STILL don't have ADSL supply.
I find it absolutely incredible that the (intelligent?) CEOs of these companies haven't the wit to realise that their actions are the ones that encourage us lot break the law. If CDs, often more costly than a DVD where I live, were FAIRLY priced globally in the first place there would be fewer P2P and .torrent abuses. A CD at 5 is a whim buy at 25 I think about if I really want it. Or maybe I will search a torrent dump site to listen to it first, and if I don't like it I bin it, a missed sale to them. And I also wonder how may times they are going release the same album as I bought in the 70s, repackaged with studio out-takes that were studio out-takes FOR A REASON, they are usually rubbish. The artists are then swindled out of their royalties because the COMPACT DISC was not included in the original contracts, only tape and vinyl.
Is it fair use for a company like SONY to publish music, manufacture the recorders and media, advertise and market them to a public that hasn't the right to use them?
Plus I'm willing to bet that the CEOs of Time Warner and Sony have a VCRs on which they routinely abuse copyright law.
Besides, these days most computers have a digital line out, it is siimple to re-record the music without DRM. It maybe takes ten minutes longer.
I'm with Steve Jobs and Apple on this and I use Apple too.
phil goodman, Barcelona, Spain
Music would not suffer if DRM was removed. The big 4 - Universal, Sony BMG, Warner and EMI - might have to work harder for their profits, but they do not deserve the protected monopoly position they currently have. It is time to support the French and others who want DRM removed.
Geoff Nield, Calverton, Nottingham