Valerie Elliott, Steve Hawkes
Win VIP tickets
Supermarkets are charging manufacturers when shoplifters steal their goods. The extraordinary practice was disclosed by the Competition Commission in its final report on the £120billion-a-year groceries market, published yesterday.
It is the latest example of the watchdog finding that retail buyers are transferring “excessive” risk to suppliers to cover their own losses.
In future, supermarkets found guilty of passing on such costs face punishing fines by the proposed new ombudsman, dubbed Offshop, to investigate grievances by suppliers at the hands of supermarkets.
The new regulator will be able to hear and investigate complaints from farmers and any other company or traders in the grocery supply chain, including abattoirs, dairies, processors, the food service industry, wholesalers and even manufacturers of toiletries, household goods and cleaning products.
Many manufacturers at present are effectively being fined if shoplifters steal small, high-value goods such as razor blades and beauty products.
They frequently have to agree to pay out costs for shoplifting and other “shrinkage” — which also includes unsold or defective goods and any that prompt consumer complaints — as part of the contract to supply goods.
Shrinkage costs to supermarkets are almost £2.5 billion a year, though the chains attempt to offload the losses on to suppliers.
It is well documented that farmers and packing companies are forced to accept lower prices if vegetables, fruit or flowers are damaged or rotting, but the practice of a levy for store thefts is little known. A number of retailers readily owned up to the tactic when asked about it by investigators. The chains defended the practice and insisted that suppliers can be at fault for failing to use secure packaging.
The commission rejected the pleadings from the supermarkets and in future these costs for “shrinkage” are to be outlawed. Supermarkets must take responsibility for all goods after delivery, it recommends.
The watchdog suggests that if stores have problems with theft of certain items they should be stocked near checkouts or in tamper-proof displays.
The report states: “We have particular concerns regarding the transfer of risk from grocery retailers to suppliers in situations where this transfer creates ‘a moral hazard'; that is, where the retailer has the ability to affect the degree of risk incurred, but as a result of the transfer, the retailer has less incentive to minimise that risk.”
The commission raised concerns that such practices reduced incentives for suppliers to invest in new products and processes.
“If unchecked, these practices, which are essentially a side-effect of competition between grocery retailers with buyer power, will be detrimental to the interests of consumers.”
The watchdog has also raised alarm about hefty charges on suppliers after any customer complaints. “We have concerns that in the absence of an obligation to provide proof to the suppliers that the charge was properly incurred, retailers will have an incentive to over-compensate customers, at the expense of suppliers.”
John Noble, director of the British Brands Group, which represents leading manufacturers, was pleased that companies would no longer be penalised for shoplifting of goods. He said: “This is very helpful and clarifies where the responsibilities for any losses from shrinkage lie in the future.”
The National Farmers' Union, Friends of the Earth and ActionAid were also delighted that the watchdog had recognised the damaging impact of the retrospective cash demands.
Supermarkets were infuriated and said that they would have to rewrite their terms and conditions in contracts. Retailers also believe that losses from shoplifting should be a shared risk, as loss of sales affected manufacturers in equal measure. They are also angry about being asked to foot the cost of the new ombudsman, estimated to be some £2 million a year. Peter Freeman, chairman of the Competition Commission, gave warning that if supermarkets failed to agree to fund the ombudsman then the Department for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform was ready to intervene.
— On the busiest shopping day of the year, the last Saturday before Christmas, British retailers lose around £50,000 of stock every minute, or £26.4 million in one day
— Britain has topped the European shoplifting rankings for the past seven years, with more than £1.5billion worth of products being stolen every year
— More than 700,000 Britons shoplift every year. As a result of shoplifting, every household in Britain will have to pay an extra £150 for their goods this year
— Twenty-one per cent of shoplifters regard supermarkets as the easiest place for shoplifting, followed by DIY centres
— Razor blades are the most stolen item, followed by cosmetics, alcohol, toiletries, lingerie, CDs and DVDs
Sources: BRC, Checkpoint Systems, Times archives, BBC
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Manufacturers should share in the responsibility of shoplifting if they do not design packaging to deter theft. Less razorblade theft would occur if razorblades were packed in a 3" cubed package with tear resistant material.
James, Schertz, Texas, USA
I cannot believe anyone would use the excuse to shoplift because no staff was available to pacify you!
There is no excuse for theft . Grow up!
Tam, Springfield, USA
There are lots of things that Retailers can do to prevent shoplifting, however almost all of them will impact on sales - something which suppliers do not want. They have control in terms of providing merchanising solutions which can prevent theft. And Pete - more staff = higher prices....
Adam , Grays, UK
Honestly, these supermarkets are a joke and they need their complacent and greedy wings clipped! If I buy a car and it is stolen and I go back to the showroom to ask for my money back, the first three words they will say will be "Are you mad"? and the fifth word would be "off!"
Mike, Balsall Common, UK
It is years since retailers stopped bothering about shoplifters. Frequently items are stolen simply because there are not enough staff around for one to pay for the purchase. The answer is simple pay more staff but they wont because they know the customer will eventually cough up one way or another
Pete, Barry, Wales
Suppliers to supermarkets have no power to negotiate. The supermarkets dictate the terms. Only the biggest brands have any negotiating position. Some supermarket buyers abuse their position with bully boy tactics. I have had first hand experience of this.
Martin, edinburgh, scotland
Surely the principle of passing the cost along to the consumer also creates a moral hazard given the near-monopoly many supermarkets have within small communities. What's the incentive for my local store (only one on the island on which I live) to minimise theft when we've nowhere else local to go?
David, Sheerness, UK
It seems strange to me that suppiers should be responsible for retailer losses that they have no control over, but maybe I'm misssing the point?.
Maybe the contractor should be more robust in their contractual negotiations?
Phil Austin, RAUNDS, England