Robin Pagnamenta in Oskarshamn, Sweden
We've made some changes
to The Sunday Times
Green Central: click here to read Times Online's environment blog
Inside the cavernous hall of a nuclear storage plant in southern Sweden, an 18-tonne steel canister, bristling with tiny fins to draw out excess heat, is being hauled slowly through a hatch by a crane.
Packed with highly radioactive spent nuclear fuel from a reactor north of Stockholm, the canister is being made ready for 30 years of storage in pools sunk into the bedrock. Once it cools sufficiently, it will be placed permanently in a final repository deep underground.
Surrounded by picturesque pine forests, lakes and rocky islets, Oskarshamn might seem an unlikely location for the 4,705 tonnes of high-level waste that is the legacy of Sweden's 40-year nuclear programme.
But to many in the industry, this unassuming plant on the shores of the Baltic represents the most advanced method yet developed for handling nuclear waste - and offers valuable lessons for Britain as it embarks on the construction of a new generation of nuclear reactors.
Britta Freudenthal, of the Swedish nuclear waste management company SKB, offers a sobering insight into why most countries have found decisions over the handling of this hazardous material so difficult.
Were the fuel rods to be withdrawn from their protective canister and into the open air, “you would need to be at least 20km away to be safe from the radiation they emit”, she says. Furthermore, they will remain highly radioactive for 100,000 years.
But while Britain has dithered for decades over where and how to dispose of its own, larger store of high- level nuclear waste - most of which remains at a temporary facility in Sellafield, Cumbria, Sweden has quietly set about finding a practical solution.
“It doesn't matter whether or not we are committed to building any more reactors or not,” says SKB's Jenny Rees. “We need a safe place to store the waste we have already created. It is our responsibility to future generations.”
That is why the Swedish Government this year will pick a site for its final repository from two possible locations, including one just a few kilometres from Oskarshamn, with construction due to start in 2012. Both communities have volunteered to host the site and support its construction.
But it has taken 30 years to get this far. Meticulous studies of the country's bedrock to identify a geologically stable site have been accompanied by intensive research on how to package and store the waste safely for such an extended period of time.
Once the final repository is built by about 2018 at a cost of £1.8 billion, Sweden's spent nuclear fuel will be taken from the interim store, encased in solid steel and then welded inside five-metre-high canisters made from pure copper 5cm thick.
The canisters will then be transported into a deep underground store, about 400 to 700 metres beneath the surface - any deeper and the pressure of the surrounding rock would be too high.
At the rate of roughly one per day, they will then be placed in cylindrical vaults bored from the surrounding crystalline granite and embedded in Bentonite clay - a material similar to cat litter - that absorbs excess water.
Swedish scientists believe that in these conditions, the 6,000 canisters planned for the repository should be safe for 100,000 years, possibly even longer.
While SKB, a joint venture co-owned by four power companies including Vatenfall and E.ON, has not yet begun building its final repository, it has built a full-sized demonstration project at Oskarshamn.
Descending through the 3.7-kilometre tunnel blasted from solid bedrock to 400m underground is an eerie experience.
The silence is broken only by the noise of five huge pumps that extract 1,200 litres of water per minute. Test sites monitor everything from the growth of microbes to different ways of gently depositing the canisters in their vaults.
The work carried out by SKB is paid for from a levy on electricity bills. Since its creation 30 years ago, it has raised SKr38 billion, about half of which has been spent on the research programme so far. The fund also pays for decommissioning of nuclear power stations as they are retired from service.
One reason why Sweden has got so far with the project has been the nuclear industry's insistence on full transparency and public consultation throughout.
Tens of thousands of visitors come to visit the site every year, making Oskarshamn's nuclear plant one of the municipality's top tourist attractions.
“Transparency is the key word here,” says Linnea Sandwall, a spokesperson for SKB. “It's very important to meet people to show them what we do. There are no secrets.”
It is a lesson the UK nuclear industry, with its history of cover-ups and hushed-up accidents, would do well to study as it gears up for a new build programme.
How the new breed of location based mobile services can find your nearest cashpoint, restaurant or wi-fi hotspot
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Are you California dreaming? Explore the wonders of the Golden State. Also enter our fantastic competition
See the best entries in this year's competition
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

Overseas contacts and local business information

Find a course, arrange a game and save money
2006
£189,500
NW England
2008/08
£169,950
NW England
2007/57
£35,000
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
Circa £82,000 per annum
Birmingham Women's Hospital
Birmingham
To £28k
Barclaycard
Northampton/Liverpool/Teeside
£
Up to £66,000 per annum
Hertfordshire County Council
South East
To £38k
Barclaycard
Northampton/Liverpool
2 Bathrooms, Balcony and Garden
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Dining, Shopping & Riverside Pk
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Larry, sending nuclear waste to the sun is not feasible at present. Orbital launch might be possible, but solar impact requires 50 times the energy. It may be feasible in 100 years, though I suspect transmutation options will be more attractive then.
The article is not quite right - nuclear waste cannot remain highly radioactive for 100,000 years. The short half-life products decay over a matter of decades. The waste is "highly" radioactive for about 100 years. After a few thousand years, its as radioactive as natural uranium.
In an ideal world you'd be able to rent out spent waste in copper canisters for home or pool heating, but in the hands of terrorists this is very nasty material.
Alex, Tunbridge Wells,
"Much ado about nothing" UNLESS the Swedes had the same 'expertise' as the Americans who planned the Yucca Mtn disposal site - what with ITS 'faults' (pun intended).
Really though - disposal of either highly radioactive or lesser radioactive materials can be done much more effectively (and cheaper in the long run) by thrusting it out beyond the atmosphere and into the sun. The requisite technologies are already in-use in other applications (primarily US military) and the scheme HAS received aclaim from noted figures in space science.
Of course - NOT having to guard and provide continuous care would also mean fewer high paying jobs for scientists, engineers and an army of workers as once its gone - its gone -and the launch facility can be shuttered.
There's even a UK firm (in Cardiff), skilled in the essential technology (Mag-Lev), to carry it out. All that's needed is USAF Space Command and EU support, an equatorial launch site and a few tonnes of silicon dioxide ceramic.
Larry, Middletown, USA/NY
I'm sorry but this is the UK not Sweden. Have you ever tried to get information from any government institutions. Whilst this is a good idea and it may well work here - the powers that be - will spend so much time debating the matter that it will be old hat. We will have health and safety debating every single nut and bolt, local authorities will dither over every single penny and locals will then argue their case tooth and nail. The whole system would take donkey's years.
PG
peter, ammanford, uk