Carl Mortished, World Business Editor
Your last chance to get tickets to Top Gear Live

Tony Hayward, BP’s chief executive, yesterday gave the market a strong signal that he wants to realise value from the company’s loss-making investments in renewables.
The Alternative Energy unit, which comprises BP’s solar cell manufacturing, wind power, hydrogen and bio-mass ventures, was “worth between $5 billion and $7 billion”, Mr Hayward said. In a strong hint that the company was feeling the pressure to generate a financial return from billions of dollars of investment in renewables, he said: “We intend to grow this business predominantly for its equity value.”
Although the BP chief executive told City analysts that there were no plans to sell the Alternative Energy businesses, he said: “As we go forward, we will be looking at how best we can realise that growing value for our shareholders.”
BP has invested billions of dollars in solar energy over the past decade but the business still does not deliver a profit. It was a core part of the strategy adopted by Lord Browne of Madingley, Mr Hayward’s predecessor, to position BP as a company committed to green energy and it underpinned BP’s rebranding in 2000 with the “beyond petroleum” slogan.
Sources within BP suggested the company could seek partners to invest directly in its renewable businesses. An external investment would help to crystallise value in the Alternative Energy unit, which Mr Hayward said the stock market fails to recognise.
Analysts said that BP was under pressure to retain its loss-making renewables business for political reasons as it was a “calling card” for the company when talking to governments about environmental issues. However, BP was also feeling intense financial pressure to raise returns and it needed to demonstrate that renewables could generate a profit for shareholders.
Jon Rigby, oil analyst at UBS, said: “Inside a big oil company like BP, a loss-making business has negative value. They are saying that this has material value.”
The valuation of Alternative Energy emerged as Mr Hayward delivered a strategy presentation to the City in which he focused on BP’s potential to raise oil and gas output from 3.8 million barrels per day to 4.3 million bpd by 2012 and efforts to cut overheads. “We aim to cut corporate overheads by 15-20 per cent and eliminate some 5,000 posts worldwide over the next 18 months,” he said.
Andy Inglis, BP’s exploration chief, said the company had added 2.4 million barrels to its resource base in 2007, raising the total to 42 billion barrels. BP’s reserve life had risen from 41 to 43 years of output, he said.
In October Mr Hayward began a restructuring in which he scrapped the division that housed gas, power and renewables, folding the gas business into the upstream oil exploration arm. The shake-up relegated renewables into a low-ranking business unit, suggesting that Mr Hayward was less enamoured with renewables projects than his predecessor. Last year Mr Hayward said BP would return to the controversial Canadian tar sands business – which Lord Browne had criticised.
Vivienne Cox, head of the Alternative Energy business, said BP had invested $1.5 billion in the green energy business since 2005, with a further $1.5 billion planned for this year. She estimated that the solar business was worth between $2.1 billion and $3.9 billion, wind was valued at between $1.8 billion and $2.1 billion, while BP’s gas-fired electricity generators are worth $1.2 billion.
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
In our new series, Tony Hawks takes a dry, wry look at modern life - junk mail, interminable meetings and snooty sales assistants
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
2007
£30,000
2008
£44,990
2008
£48,489
Great car insurance deals online
c.£75,000
GlosFirstmeansbusiness
Gloucestershire
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
£
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
Competitive Package
Npower
West Midlands
Some of the finest Apts & Penthouses
Across London
Great Investment, River Views
Luxury properties within exclusive development in
Chislehurst Kent
A new experience in Luxury Living
Multi–Centre
from Only £829pp
With Ramblers Worldwide Holidays!
£POA
List your property with two leading travel websites
£POA
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - search houses for sale and rooms and property to rent in the UK. Milkround Job Search - for graduate careers in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
They could do worse than combine their wind and PV power production to drive their Butanol plant so producing a direct additive to the petroleum products and satisfying the future renewables percentage directives!
Of course non of these facilities will be in the right place for that?
Jim Golightly, Prudhoe, England
Johnwg's comment above ignores the reality companies have only such much technical, captial to invest and management expertise. I don't think BP has the capacity to turn renewal energy into a profitable enough enterprise to just the money invested and the management time required. That said there's plenty of room for new companies to do very well in renewable energy.
MARK KLEIN, M.D., OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA
A BP shareholder with 35 years plus years sucessful experieince as a long term market player I've observed integrated oil shares founder when they take on non core operations. Exxon shares foundered in the 1970s when it went into the computerized typewriter and fax machine business with the QYX device. If BP doesn't get it act together, it will get raided.
MARK KLEIN, M.D., OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA
No energy company in today's world can afford to turn their back on renewable energy development. Whilst every effort should be made to make it profitable as soon as possible, it would send very damaging messages to the markets to withdraw from renewables.
I have always been surprised that BP (among others) should ignore the marine renewable energy sources of wave, tidal stream and OTEC - given that they have substantial corporate experience in offshore and subsea oil and gas where much of the technology is transferable.
It would be a great benefit to future marine renewable developments if more major energy companies got involved - its less of a jump than some technologies such as solar that have a way to go as well.
Johnwg, London, UK