Dan Sabbagh, Media Editor
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes

Channel 4 could be merged with the profitable BBC Worldwide to prevent it going bankrupt.
The deal being discussed by regulators and ministers would see the creation of “4 Worldwide” and represent the biggest transfer of intellectual property, including Radio Times and its lucrative BBC DVDs, away from the corporation. It would, however, generate the £100 million a year that Ofcom, the broadcast regulator, says that Channel 4 needs to survive.
The creation of the hybrid broadcaster would represent a huge financial sacrifice for the BBC, but would help Channel 4 to pay for expensive “public service” programmes such as the nightly news fronted by Jon Snow.
Channel 4 would run the business, with the BBC retaining a minority stake, under a plan that “has been gaining traction” during the past few weeks. Both broadcasters are publicly owned, although Channel 4 funds itself through advertising.
Any merger would have to overcome opposition from within the BBC, which is reluctant to lose control of Worldwide, which made profits of £112.5 million last year. “Worldwide is not some portable cash machine to be delivered to the point of need,” one BBC insider said. But the scheme would avoid a raid on the licence fee to hand cash directly to Channel 4.
BBC Worldwide owns all the corporation’s profit-making businesses, including Top Gear magazine, and sells the rights to popular BBC programmes, such as Strictly Come Dancing, abroad. It draws no money from the £3.4 billion BBC licence fee.
Channel 4, which was set up a quarter of a century ago by the Thatcher Government as an alternative to the BBC and ITV, is still profitable. However, it believes that it risks going under in the next five years because it can no longer generate enough advertising to support the “distinctive” mix of programming – from Big Brother to Dispatches – that it was created to provide. Ofcom estimates that Channel 4 needs between £50 million and £100 million a year to survive for the next decade; Channel 4 says that it requires up to £150 million a year to keep afloat. Last year it made a profit before tax of £1.6 million.
Last night there were signs that the scheme could run up against political opposition. John Whittingdale, MP, chairman of the Culture Media and Sport Select Committee, said: “This is essentially a plan aimed at taking public money surreptiously, because it take profits away from the BBC, and forces the licence fee to go up. But I know Channel 4 is keen on it, because it thinks that it would be difficult for it to justify taking public money directly.”
Today the BBC will present its own plans aimed at heading off the loss of Worldwide, which will include a series of “commercial partnerships” with ITV, Channel 4 and other broadcasters. But those plans are likely to be rejected by Channel 4 as insufficient.
Ofcom needs to make a decision on Channel 4’s future by the middle of next month and will make a public recommendation to ministers. The regulator fears that if Channel 4 were privatised, it would have to ditch news and current affairs, with its schedules dominated by reality and entertainment programmes such as Wife Swap and How to Look Good Naked.
Several options remain under consideration. Yet the advantange of the 4 Worldwide merger would be that it allows Ofcom to dismiss an alternative proposal to hand some of the licence fee directly to Channel 4, leaving it open to the accusation that the public money funds Big Brother or Gordon Ramsay’s programes.
The tie-up would also have to overcome any state aid concerns raised by the European Commission, which has already objected to a proposed payment of £14 million of licence-fee money to help Channel 4 to pay for the costs of digital switchover.
The stakes remain high for all concerned, with Channel 4 battling for its surival, and Ofcom under pressure to present a plausible plan to be inserted into the Government’s review of all communications policy.
Channel 4 has a remit to innovate and cater for minorities, but the emergence of digital television has sent its audience share falling from 10 per cent in 2001 to 8.2 per cent this year.
The loss of viewers puts pressure on advertising income, which has also been hit hard by the recession and is expected to have fallen by 5 to 6 per cent this year.
BBC Worldwide
Turnover £916 million
Profits £112.5 million
Founded Dates from the creation in 1923 of Radio Times, which was formed when newspapers refused to carry the times of radio programmes
Ownership Commercial division of the BBC
Owns Radio Times, Lonely Planet, BBC America and 28 other international channels, Dancing with the Stars (US version of Strictly Come Dancing), bbc.com, Planet Earth DVDs
Channel 4
Turnover £944.9 million
Profits £1.6 million
Founded 1982, to break the BBC-ITV duopoly, with remit to transmit distinctive, innovative programmes, catering for minority tastes. Its chief executive was Sir Jeremy Isaacs. When Michael Grade took over in 1987, Isaacs threatened to throttle him if he failed to respect the channel’s remit.
Ownership Public corporation, state-owned.
Broadcasts Big Brother, C4 News, Hollyoaks, Dispatches
Articles from our sister site WSJ.com:
You may be asked to subscribe to read certain articles
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
The best bet is for the BBC to incoparate Chn 4 into BBC, on a seperate footing. Reduce the 4 station to 3 and the BBC could produce 50% of its content. Any loss would come out of BBC income. Top slicing the fee would reduce the direct payment for no advertising TV.
James, Brighton, England
BBC 1, BBC2, BBC3, BBC4, Cbbceebees, BCCeebiesBB, BBC News 24, BBC Parliament, BBC HD and then add Channel 4, E4, More 4, Film 4 and Music4. Just how many state-owned TV stations does one country need. And I haven't even mentioned radio....
John Everard, Huntingdon, England
how about this, if channel 4 goes bankrupt-let it! or is that a crazy thought in these days of post modern government intervention?
why is it neccesary for the state to own essentially 2 televison networks. why does the tax payer via the license have to pay for bbc1234 etc when it should be private
will, grimsby, uk
Responding to Edward from Newbury's comments - of course BBC America has to be able to stand on its own, that should goes without saying. BBC America is hardly going to be the recipient of UK licence fee money - said money is solely for the BBC to provide a service to the UK.
Tim, London,
C4 is a bastion of the Left which is why the BBC and Labour are so dreadfully concerned about its fate, while no one else is. Their attempt to shunt millions of licence fee money at C4 is a disgrace. I will personally complain to the EU if C4 receives any UK state aid including a buy out by the BBC
Simon , London, UK
They should let it go to the wall. There are plenty of other channels and I don't see why the BBC World Service should be involved at all.
Buster, Birmingham,
I seem to remember Ch4 use to get a slice of the license fee money until a few years ago. Ofcom said they could manage without it. Looks like they were wrong.
Why take money directly from the Beeb?
Broadcast is dying anyway, make way for the internet.
Jason, London, UK
Amusing that there is no mention of the biggest cash cow the BBC have and thats BBC America. The division is so lucrative that it stands on its own, through advertising and subscription in America.
Edward, Newbury, England
I thought BIG BROTHER was such a money spinner that it was saving Ch 4 for the future ? Another load of spin from CH4 management !!!!
IAN PAYNE, Walsall,
The aim is to use public money to preserve public service programming. So give central or regional funds directly to independent producers for appropriate projects commissioned by any broadcaster. Cut out the middle-men and their weighty bureaucracies.
John, Norwich,
So instead of 2 culturally left of centre broadcasters paid for by all the public, we get one mega left of centre opinion forming agency? Sounds good news for Labour and the liberal elite.
Tom, Witney, UK
Living in the USA we thrive on BBC America, one of the few out of hundreds of channels worth watching. We'd love to have C4 too...
Martin, Cincinnati, USA
Why exactly should C4 be saved, big brother crap. holloakes etc, why are revenues falling ? because advertisers are'nt using C4, economic down turn, lack of viewers, rather be on sky. If your product anint no good people are'nt going to pay for it ! The bbc will now want an increase in the tv tax
james, portishead, uk
That's barking.
If one is profitable and the other not, then get the management of the well-run one to take the other over, not the other way round.
Weird!
bix, edinburgh, uk
Blimey, I've had brain damage, Shellshock, PTSD for 46 years. Lived on low wages for all that time, in danger of becoming veg or popping my clogs at any time.
Any one out there got a couple of million so that I can set my family up before I go?
Course not. I'm not a Fat Cat in need of a large bonus.
P Harvey, Ashford,
Channel 4 start all these extra Channels..4 + 1,More 4 & Film 4 & now 4 music & then have the cheek to ask for the BBC help to pay for them !!!! Shouldnt they work within the money they have before starting all these extra channels ??
paulbroadhurst, walsall, england
I would pay good money to have Big Brother, Wife Swap and many other Channel 4 programmes taken off the air. It would be a travesty if they were "rescued" at the expense of one of the BBC's crown jewels.
Dan Smith, Treorchy,
Why does the Government want to jeopardise a perfectly well run and profitable BBC Worldwide by giving it to a weak management fo C4. We do not need programmes like Big Brother and Gordon Ramysay's and C4 should be allowed to go to the wall
M V Pattni, London, UK
How many cameramen do you need to video a cooking programme? I see 5 - any advance on that? Seriously, though, the cost structure looks completely out of hand. I know it's counter-cultural, and definitely not BBC style, but a bit of economising could help.
Colin, shrewsbury,
Maybe if C4 didn't pay such ludicrous salaries to its executive staff, they might make a bit more profit.
Viv, Leeds,
Crazy! Nothing more than a way to steal future money from the public by re-allocating the BBC's one successful source of funding which isn't from the licence fee. I don't care if C4 goes under for a second. What exactly is being preserved here? Sell it to Sky.
Al, Southampton, UK