Dan Sabbagh, Media Editor
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
The BBC could be forced to hand up to £150 million a year to rival television
companies to pay for regional news and children’s programmes.
The money could be clawed back from the licence fee to safeguard so-called
public service content on commercial television, the communications
regulator said yesterday.
The proposals from Ofcom come amid gloomy predictions from the regulator about
the future for British television after the switch to digital in 2012.
Ed Richards, Ofcom’s chief executive, published projections showing that
spending on programmes could tumble from £2.7 billion a year now to £1.1
billion as broadcasters shed audiences and advertisers alike and relied on
repeats and American content.
“The current system [of funding television] is breaking down,” Mr Richards
said, adding that viewers wanted “public service competition to the BBC”,
which could be provided by pumping licence fee money, or another form of
public money, direct to commercial broadcasters.
Ofcom’s proposal marked the beginning of a review of public service
broadcasting, which is likely to form the starting point for a parliamentary
Bill shaking up the television industry as it enters the fully digital era.
That could mean the biggest alteration in the funding of television since
the introduction of the joint radio and television licence fee after the
Second World War.
Implementing radical change will prove controversial among most broadcasters,
with the BBC opposed to sharing even a small proportion of the £3 billion a
year licence fee and ITV sceptical about whether it should take any public
money. Only Channel 4, which is worried about its financial future, is keen
to take a slice of the licence fee, or any other public cash.
Andy Duncan, the chief executive of Channel 4, said: “This is a clear
statement about the importance of plurality, of having public service
competition to the BBC. We welcome the strong statement about the need for
funding, and the new sense of urgency is very welcome.”
Mr Richards said that already some valued types of programming were under
threat because of the growing financial pressures on ITV and Channel 4,
which are suffering from fragmenting viewing and declining advertising at a
time when people can choose from more than 300 channels.
Mr Duncan said the problem could best be seen in children’s television, “where
we have seen such a reduction in commercial broadcasters spending on
children’s television that S4C, the Welsh language channel, is the
second-biggest commissioner of children’s programmes after the BBC.”
Ofcom also identified question marks about the funding of regional news at
ITV, and in Scotland and Wales, although not Northern Ireland. It said that
Channel 4 may need some financial help if it is to survive, a statement that
came after a long lobbying campaign by the broadcaster.
Ofcom highlighted options for the future structure of Britain’s most popular
channels. All placed the BBC at the heart of the system, but differed in the
amount of public money that could be available to ITV, Channel 4 and other
commercial broadcasters.
However, in reality the debate will focus on whether some BBC licence fee or
other money should be given to Channel 4, and how far ITV should be allowed
to reduce its obligations to show regional programmes , although Mr Richards
insisted that “we are not expressing a preference at this stage”.
The strongest criticism of the proposals came from BSkyB, the satellite
broadcaster that is 39.1 per cent owned by News Corporation, parent company
ofThe Times.A spokesman said: “Is it necessary to start pouring money
into public service broadcasting, when the system is leaking like a sieve?
The BBC, for example, uses licence fee money to pay for US programmes — cash
that could be saved and spent elsewhere.”
—The most powerful woman in British radio announced yesterday that she would
be stepping down from her role as the BBC’s director of audio and music,
after four decades at the corporation (Amanda Andrews writes). Jenny
Abramsky, who was ultimately responsible for the appointments and
controversial pay packages of key BBC presenters, from Jonathan Ross to
Chris Moyles, has been appointed by the Prime Minister to chair the Heritage
Lottery Fund.
Articles from our sister site WSJ.com:
You may be asked to subscribe to read certain articles
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Must we really have a license to watch television in the UK ? With the threat of prison if we don't pay up. If the BBC is as good as it claims to be why can't it just be funded by those who actually want to watch it ?
Robert, Luton,
Well if the government wanted to know what the public thought the BBC TV Licence would have already been scrapped. Alas they insist on subsidising what the liberal/left minority want
John, Salford, England
Steve, that is completly wrong. If the NHS was only for people who could pay we would be in the same situation as in America were the hospitals have to check their patients bank balance. The NHS is designed to help people who can't afford it.
The I Player is probably one of the best on the market, and the BBC should countinue doing it. It's allready had twenty million views.
BBC Worldwide increases the name value of our shows, which is worthwile
mike bale, london,
The UK public have been taxed to watch television. The BBC just wastes money in the same way the NHS wastes money, this service is for the people who pay not the free loaders who pay nothing. Cancel the world service little or no benefit for the licence payer. Stop wasting money on software such as the iPlayer when similar free to use software already exists.
steve tea, manchester, cheshire
It has enough difficulty subsidising itself !!!!!!!!!!!!
Ian Payne, WALSALL,
A compulsory TV licence no longer makes any sense. We are living in the 21st Century - and given the digital age it is time to call it a day.
Phil, Wales,