Dan Sabbagh and Adam Sherwin
We've made some changes
to The Sunday Times
The BBC faces fines of about £300,000 over the faked phone-in scandals it emerged last night as producers suggested that more disclosures could be in the pipeline.
As the broadcaster began suspending producers involved with the controversial programmes, Ofcom, the communications regulator, asked for details on how programme staff were able to “win” phone-in competitions on Comic Relief, Sport Reliefand Children in Need. A full inquiry will almost certainly follow.
Meanwhile, the tight timescale of the BBC’s inquiry into the scandal, which left some producers unable to certify their programmes before the inquiry’s deadline, has led to speculation about more evidence of fakery.
The regulator said that the apparently faked competitions “appear to raise serious questions under Ofcom’s broadcasting code, which requires competitions to be conducted fairly”. It added it would decide on “next steps” once it has more information from the BBC.
Earlier this month Ofcom fined the BBC £50,000 for one breach, when production staff faked the winner of a phone-in for a Blue Peter competition. With the BBC owning up to six more breaches, all at least as serious, a fine of £300,000 in total can be expected.
Sir Ian Blair, the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, also signalled a willingness to investigate if asked to by Ofcom, although there were no plans to do that at this stage. Sir Ian said that “it is probably a bit too early” to see if police action was required. He added: “I think it needs a bit more time to understand what’s going on.”
Separately, the BBC began suspending “a small number” of unnamed staff, understood to be about ten, including an unnamed producer at the children’s programme TMi, as it tried to pick up the pieces after Wednesday’s revelations. However, the action prompted anger from unions and employees who felt unhappy that no senior managers were suspended.
Luke Crawley, an assistant general secretary with Bectu, the broadcast union, said that Peter Fincham, the Controller of BBC One, should also be suspended after he released a misleading promotional clip of the Queen that claimed to show Her Majesty storming off in a huff from a photo-shoot with Annie Leibovitz.
“If Peter Fincham’s defence is that he was acting on what he had been told, then isn’t that the same for some producers who are now being suspended? It’s not necessarily a defence for anybody, but the point is that senior managers and producers are not being treated consistently,” Mr Crawley said. There was speculation over further possible disclosures because the BBC had conducted such a short inquiry before revealing that it had discovered the six examples of fakery.
On Thursday last week, BBC bosses led by Jana Bennett, the director of vision, asked staff to admit to any other breaches in the aftermath of the Blue Peter judgment. By this Tuesday, the BBC had accumulated enough information to identify six potential breaches and pass on details to BBC trustees, before their meeting with Mark Thompson on Wednesday morning – a timescale that left only four working days to uncover the abuses and had broadcasters questioning exactly when BBC executives discovered there were problems with Children in Need and Comic Relief.
BBC executives conceded last night that they had “some niggles” about “one or two” of the faked incidents prior to emailing all staff asking for further examples last Thursday. The BBC refused to specify the exact incidents, although one person said they were among “the less high profile” examples – implying that they were not about Comic Relief, Sport Relief, or Children in Need.
Independent producers who work for the BBC complained that they could not certify all their programmes in time for the BBC’s deadline.
One independent producer – one of the top ten used by the corporation – said that the BBC contacted him last Friday and asked for details of any breaches by Tuesday. On the basis that it would be impossible to meet such a tight deadline, the internal inquiry is expected to run on far longer, meaning that more disclosures could be in the pipeline.
Liz Kershaw, the 6 Music DJ, whose Saturday programme included a fake-phone-in that ran in 2005 and 2006, is still expected to go on air at 10am, transmitting an apology. She has worked on Radio 1 and Five Live, and for BBC Coventry and Warwickshire.
How the new breed of location based mobile services can find your nearest cashpoint, restaurant or wi-fi hotspot
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Are you California dreaming? Explore the wonders of the Golden State. Also enter our fantastic competition
See the best entries in this year's competition
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

Overseas contacts and local business information

Find a course, arrange a game and save money
2006
£189,500
NW England
2008/08
£169,950
NW England
2007/57
£35,000
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
Circa £82,000 per annum
Birmingham Women's Hospital
Birmingham
To £28k
Barclaycard
Northampton/Liverpool/Teeside
£
Up to £66,000 per annum
Hertfordshire County Council
South East
To £38k
Barclaycard
Northampton/Liverpool
2 Bathrooms, Balcony and Garden
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Dining, Shopping & Riverside Pk
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
There is obviously a widespread culture amongst the BBC which feels it is fair game to treat its customers, ie the general public, with contempt. The case of the devious Blue Peter competition is particularly disgraceful. Set against the background of lies, spin and hypocrisy emanating from our political class, it really is a sad state of affairs. The best thing the public can do in return is to boycott the BBC, at least those channels or programmes that are responsible for these fraudulent acts.
mc, nanchester,
This country is riddled with corruption among the media, politicians and industry. Organizations conspire with telecommunication companies to impose on us non-geographic, premium phone numbers with contrived delays to maximise revenue ( see, for example, SAYNOTO0870.COM site). Despite myriad representations to the Government by the public against whom the theft is perpetrated, nothing is ever done to stop the practice. The matter of Brenda's alleged conduct to the request to remove her coronet pales into insignificance to the blatant misrepresentation of facts by Ch4's "An Inconvenient Truth" that portayed anthropogenic CO2 production as insignificant compared with that produced by volcanic action, implying that man's input to global warming was insignificant, when, in fact, the very reverse is true. Why was no action ever taken against Ch4 and the factually deviant producer of this mischievious programme? Polemic is one thing, downright lies perpetrated by the media is another!
Maxadolf, Epsom, UK
I believe it is very important that the police do get involved with this crime as no-one should be above the law and the BBC and other broadcasters should face the full justice of the law. If any company or individual was involved in fraud and deception then there would be no hesitation in taking them through the courts. What I find even more serious and discusting is that children have been the victims of this deception and fraud and that is unforgivable. Bring them all to justice!!
Mike Smith, Norwich, Norfolk
right , and where is the fine money coming from - yes you and me the TV license payers!
kc, norwich, norfolk