Adam Sherwin, Media Correspondent
Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition
The BBC’s coverage of business repeatedly breaches the Corporation’s own standards on impartiality, according to an internal report.
Its interviews can be “sycophantic” or overly aggressive, while presenters are guilty of appearing to plug products.
The independent review, chaired by Sir Alan Budd, found no evidence of systematic bias against business and concluded that most of the BBC’s business output meets the required standards of impartiality.
Yet it pointed to “a number of individual lapses” and identified trends that led to “repeated breaches of the BBC’s standards”.
Radio Five Live presenters and reporters were singled out for airing their personal preferences about commercial products.
“We have learnt, among other things, that one is a fan of Majestic Wine, another is an enthusiastic subscriber to Sky and one likes shopping at JJB Sports,” the report said.
It accepted that presenters are encouraged to “express themselves as rounded individuals who have a life outside the studio”. But the behaviour on Five Live appeared to be “a departure from both the BBC’s editorial guidelines and the definition of impartiality as outlined by the Director of News”.
The presenters of BBC One’s Breakfast programme came under fire for “enthusiastically and uncritically” playing with Nintendo’s newly launched Wii games console.
A Ten O’Clock News interview with the Microsoft billionaire Bill Gates in January was singled out for being “sycophantic”, while a number of interviews with Stuart Rose, the Marks & Spencer chief executive, were “too uncritical”.
Conversely, a Radio 4 Today programme interview with Angela Knight, of the British Bankers’ Association, could be viewed as “hostile and aggressive”, while a Five Live interview with the managing director of British Gas at the time, which began “You’re taking the mickey . . .”, did not appear to be impartial.
The report, commissioned by the now-defunct BBC Board of Governors, concluded that the Corporation’s business coverage placed too much focus on the consumer angle.
It accused the BBC of failing to give sufficient coverage to the departure of Lord Browne of Madingley, the BP chief executive, because the story had no consumer angle.
In some cases, the preoccupation with the consumer angle led to items of no real consequence, it said. “For example, a series of pieces on Breakfast [January 17, 2007] amounted to the promotion of a £19 suit from Asda.” It was also noted: “If a company achieves large profits, the story is more likely to focus on at whose expense the profits have been made rather than examining the benefits to staff and society of a British company doing well.”
The report concluded: “We do not believe the BBC has a systematic bias against business, though at times the BBC can be unconsciously partial and unbalanced in its business coverage. This arises mainly from a lack of awareness of the commercial world – many BBC journalists have never worked in business – and from a preoccupation with taking the consumer perspective.”
Sir Michael Lyons, the BBC Trust Chairman, said: “The Trust shares the panel’s concern about the BBC’s predominant focus on the consumer perspective in business reporting if it results in the audience not receiving the full story.” Huw Edwards conducted the “sycophantic” interview with Bill Gates at the launch of Microsoft’s Vista operating system in January. The presenter asked how “the great innovator Bill Gates” planned to change our lives in 20 years.
Yet the unedited six-minute interview shows that Mr Edwards questioned the Microsoft chief over the higher prices paid by British Vista users, the slow roll-out of the company’s Zune music player and whether the company was losing its edge.
The panel criticised a Weekend Business interview with James Murdoch, the BSkyB chief executive, on Five Live. This also appeared “sycophantic” as Jeff Randall, the presenter, congratulated Mr Murdoch’s pronouncements about the future of his company as “the best sales pitch he had heard”. But Mr Randall told The Times: “I’m amazed. That was a sarcastic comment against an interviewee who didn’t answer a question properly.”
The report condemned Panorama for an investigation in which it “seemed to relish publicly humiliating RWE, the German owners of Thames Water” by hiring a water tanker and addressing RWE management through a megaphone, which “did not create an impression of balance and fairness”.
Under the spotlight
The Radio 4 interview with Angela Knight, was “hostile and agressive”, while the Corporation failed to give sufficient coverage when Lord Browne of Madingley, top right, left BP. Huw Edwards, left, was criticised for the “sycophantic” interview with Bill Gates at the launch of Microsoft’s Vista operating system. Jeff Randall was also criticised for for an interview with James Murdoch that appeared “sycophantic”
Talking points
Sycophantic? Judge for yourself online:
Articles from our sister site WSJ.com:
You may be asked to subscribe to read certain articles
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the collective power of smart thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Flip MinoHD Camcorder
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
42,945
2008
71,450
Car Insurance
Not Specified
MI6
UK-based
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Save up to £1,000 per couple with Elite Vacations at the five-star Constance Lemuria Resort
and do the British Isles this Summer.
Save up to 60% with Oxford Hotels and Inns
Try our inspiring luxury holidays to the Indian Subcontinent and South East Asia.
Great offers available
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Why is business the only dimension explored? Far more important is the issue of BBC 'Guardian' editorial stance on pretty well everything. Hostility to businesswoman Angela Knight would be a symptom of the BBC political stance. In fact was there not a BBC seminar on impartiality, which was a closed affair, but it leaked out that there is bias to the cultural left because virtually all BBC staff are of this ilk? Why no report on that? Freedom of information act probe, by Michael Crick perhaps (risking his job...)
Ibn, Haggerston, UK
Well, the BBC is just another arm of the Labour Party, so it's no surprise that they pay no attention to their own so-called standards when it suits them.
Doug, Glasgow,
Presumably inadvertent bias is also egregious in the North American service of BBC World TV. This service uses American commentators from the Washington Beltway almost exclusively on broadcasts in the North American prime viewing time slots (e.g., 0300 GMT.)
One of the attractions of BBC World TV service is that it should be in a position to give North American (including Canadian) viewers alternative viewpoints as a contrast to the American media with which we are saturated.
Shane Ryland, Royston, B.C., Canada
So what's new?,the BBC has for YEARS continually advertised/championed (sorry I have to mention them!) that food supermarket ,name begins with S,and that department store which shortens it's name by two letters.
so much for non advertising.
A.Morn, Derby, Derbyshire
I have to agree that certain BBC radio interviewers wear their hearts on their sleeves at all times and its easy to spot when the interviewer is bringing personal bias into interviews.
John Humphries used to be an excellent interviewer however since the Hutton report and his little publicised on-air row with his superiors over editing his work, his whole standards have dropped in my view. All he does now is interrupt, overtalk and throw flurries of questions at guests without time to answer the previous question.
His interviews have certainly lost their balance and sadly I turn over for ten minutes while he brings his own style to the morning interview.
John Humphries could learn a lot from Eddie Mayer - when you're as snide and as sniping as Eddie, its time to think again John, as you're getting closer every day.
Well done Sir Alan and lets hope the BBC takes note and actually does something.
Graham Outterside, Woking, UK
Breaching impartiality - only on business coverage?!
Try listening harder to the rest of BBC reporting.
Slanted, partial and Labour bias.
P Sutton, Kent, UK
The BBC routinely pushes its own political agenda, why would it not push its policies in other areas?
John Ledbury, Kings Lynn, England
There was a fun interview on World Service with Craig Venter last night, in which the BBC interviewer kept trying to get him to comment on patents, in which Venter is clearly not interested.
In the end, Venter lost patience and said "All BBC interviews are the same. I keep trying to explain the Science, but all you want to know is who gets the money."
jon livesey, Sunnyvale, CA/US
" Is it not hypocritical to run an article criticising BBC impartiality when the article itself is so patently impartial?
" Darren Ross, Sunderland.
Well, I didn't find The Times article patently impartial. It quotes Jeff Randall's statement of amazement that the report didn't recognize the sarcasm in his interview with James Murdoch and states that the independent review "concluded that most of the BBCs business output meets the required standards of impartiality." What could be fairer than that? In fact, I believe the report was more than fair to the BBC. They have never given proper coverage to business and commerce (although things have improved a little over the past few years). The reason is that the BBC is riddled with socialists who, as the report mentions, "have never worked in business" and despise capitalists and entrepreneurs. A corporation whose main revenue is guaranteed by the taxpayer will naturally attract such people.
Steve, Sutton Coldfield,
Yawn. What Media outlet isn't imparital these days?
Sarah, Belfast,
Another classic, anti-BBC article by The Times. Why have you focused almost exclusively on what the report calls "a number of individual lapses" and given barely a paragraph to the principal conclusions of the report, namely that most of the BBC output meets the required standards of impartiality?
If you read the report, it's mostly extremely positive (and fair) about the BBC's reporting, but, conveniently, The Times fails to mention any of the many sentences praising the BBC's high standards of quality and expertise. Is it not hypocritical to run an article criticising BBC impartiality when the article itself is so patently impartial?
Darren Ross, Sunderland, England
The BBC has a "received opinion" which is anti several things includuing business and the employees and contractors who make programmes obviously repond to this group think. If you listen to "You and Yours" on Radio 4 (or Radio Whinge as it is known in this house) the point is consistently made that all businesses are fraudulent or incompetent, or both.
Graham McKean, Sevenoaks, Kent
The BBC's television news coverage has declined enormously in the past five years or so. There is now an emphasis on gimmicks - pointless computer graphics, 'on-location' reports where there is no reason for the reporter to be there, meaningless views from people stopped in the street, combined with a general dumbing down and simplification of the reports themselves.
It is also presented from an overly populist viewpoint - everything is about the viewer, whether in his capacity as consumer, employee, or user of social provisions (NHS, etc.). Many will see this as the BBC's traditional left-wing bias, though I suspect it has more to do with a general laziness and desparation to achieve ratings.
Ed, London,