Robin Pagnamenta, Healthcare Industries Correspondent
Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition
Thousands of rural family doctors have cut back on, or stopped prescribing, Pfizer medicines since the launch last month of an exclusive distribution arrangement with Alliance Boots, according to a lobby group.
The Dispensing Doctors’ Association (DDA), which represents the interests of about 5,000 family doctors in remote areas who dispense drugs directly to patients rather than through a chemist, says that many doctors resent the new system for adding an extra layer of bureaucracy and cost to their work.
The DDA says that doctors will always put patient safety first, but where identical drugs are available from rival manufacturers, many are opting to prescribe non-Pfizer products.
“There is no doubt that the prescribing of Pfizer products has reduced,” David Baker, the chief executive of the DDA, said. “Obviously, you have to use the right drug for the right patient, and that comes first. But, within that, there is a clear move away from Pfizer products, which is understandable because their terms of trade are not as good.”
Richard West, the chairman of the DDA, said: “It’s an extra workload for no benefit. You have to order through a separate system, which means extra invoices and time spent processing them.”
The new distribution system, which Pfizer says is designed to prevent counterfeit drugs entering the supply chain, has made Alliance Boots the sole distributor of all Pfizer products in the UK – about 15 per cent of the market. By cutting out traditional wholesalers, Pfizer has a direct relationship with every chemist and dispensing doctor in the country.
The scheme is controversial. Critics assert that it has created a monopoly over the supply of Pfizer drugs. They accuse the company of wanting to take greater control of pricing and argue that it could cost the NHS money and lead to delays in getting key medicines to patients.
Last week the debate intensified after AstraZeneca announced similar plans by selecting two companies – AAH and Alliance Boots – to become its exclusive distributors.
The changes in the market have triggered a political backlash and an investigation of pharmaceutical wholesaling by the Office of Fair Trading.
Dr West, who has a practice near Bury St Edmunds in Suffolk, said that the new arrangements had added to existing pressure on doctors to prescribe nonbranded, or “generic”, medicines – which tend to be cheaper – to save money for the NHS.
“It’s tipping the balance,” Dr West said. “This is an added factor which has focused people’s minds.” He noted that Lipitor, a cholesterol-lowering agent made by Pfizer, is about four times as costly as simvastatin, a generic alternative.
A Pfizer spokeswoman said: “Pfizer’s new distribution arrangement has been designed to be as simple and straightforward as possible, and we have tried to ensure that any administrative changes have been kept to an absolute minimum . . . Clinical decisions should be based on the needs of the patient and the clinical effectiveness of the medicine.”

— Pharmacia & Upjohn, a US division of Pfizer, pleaded guilty in Boston to offering a kickback and was fined $19.68 million (£9.9 million). It has also been banned permanently from participating in federal healthcare programmes.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the collective power of smart thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Flip MinoHD Camcorder
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
42,945
2008
71,450
Car Insurance
Not Specified
MI6
UK-based
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Save up to £1,000 per couple with Elite Vacations at the five-star Constance Lemuria Resort
and do the British Isles this Summer.
Save up to 60% with Oxford Hotels and Inns
Try our inspiring luxury holidays to the Indian Subcontinent and South East Asia.
Great offers available
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
well, whoever thought it was to do with counterfeit medicines in the 1st place? i am not condoning an fake medication but have anecdotal evidence of generic usage sending a patient to 7mmol from 5!
all the enlightened people know it was to do with exports, you've got to ask yourself why sales in the u.s. have been decimated, wouldnt be the fact that the uk has been supplying for a profit :-) hence decimation of salesforce
julian, wirral, uk
I think that Pfizer have been very sneaky using the justification of counterfeit medicine to gain a commercial advantage.
I'm glad it has backfired, good on the doctors for not getting sucked in. Distribution through a sole supplier is bound to reduce supply and cause patients problems.
Craig, Leeds,
in total agreement in what richard west is saying, the actions of Pfizer and subsequently AZ and whoever will follow the single distribution channel mechanism, has put the cat amongst the pigeons for DD's, this has opened the door for PCT's/LHB's to add further pressure by espousing the use of generic drugs, thus hiding behind the worry of patients not receiving their medications etc but if dd's were to use generic preparations then there would be no issue with the supply chain and can purchase at a fraction of the cost. here lies the problem for dd's in that they have to sustain the surgery and the staff in it, so they are reliant on commercial deals from pharma co's, and unfortunately a return from generics is substantially less than that of a branded drug.
DD's are apathetic towards change through fear of section 8 nonsense, but there are comparable drugs to pfizers portfolio which will give you a return- BUT ITS YOU WHO HAS TO CHANGE! it is your business, only you responsible
julian, wirral, uk
It could cost the NHS money? I wonder if the dispensing
practices are more concerened about their loss of income!
To coin a Ken Clarke phrase, "The wallets in their pockets."
Donald Ralph, Alicante, Spain
Interesting that this has only just been picked up in the national press. Pharmacists have been discussing this issue for several months. Pfizer and glaxo have ample resources to find a more patient/practioner friendly solution. In the long run, however, the likely move away from prescribing these branded products will save the NHS money.
Victoria, London,
Way back in the 1950s I used to prescribe pharmaceuticals by their trade name. Realising the cost difference I changed to generic prescribing and saved the NHS thousands of pounds without any detriment to my patients. Where generic formulations are available, why prescribe by trade name?
Neville Davis, Barnet, Herts