James Rossiter
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
A controversial £106 million break fee at the heart of the £10.6 billion takeover bid by KKR, the private equity house, for Alliance Boots is raising tempers in the bitter battle for control of the FTSE 100-listed pharmacy company.
Break fees equating to as much as 1 per cent of the value of any deal are tolerated by many investors as a price worth paying to encourage bidders to table takeover offers delivering quick and certain investment profits. However, they are not approved of universally. Some investors think that they restrict the creation of open auctions for companies and instill short-termist instincts.
The £106 million break fee is payable to KKR if the Boots board goes back on an agreement to recommend the £10.6 billion terms outlined on Friday.
Sources within Terra Firma, the investment company headed by Guy Hands, maintain that the break fee is at least £50 million too much. They believe that the £106 million fee, worth 11p per Alliance Boots share, far outstrips the costs incurred by the KKR consortium.
“I can imagine them having spent £50 million but from now on the fees do not go up dramatically,” one source said. “But 1 per cent is a lot of money. They may be making a handsome profit.”
While lawyers and accountants typically bill for time spent, at least two thirds of investment bankers’ fees — by far the largest before financing costs — are usually payable only when a deal is completed. On a deal of this size, the largest private equity deal seen in Europe, banks could be charging up to £20 million each for corporate finance advice.
KKR has spent “significant” sums so far, according to insiders. It is believed to have spent four and a half months working on its takeover approach before last Friday’s recommendation. Insiders also indicated that any profit from a break fee would be split between the funds and its investment advisers, led by JPMorgan Cazenove and Merrill Lynch and lawyers at Clifford Chance.
Terra Firma, in combination with HBOS, the bank, and Wellcome Trust, the healthcare foundation, is hoping to wrest control of Boots. It has made an indicative offer of £11.15 per share, worth £10.9 billion. This is 25p per share or £300 million more than the offer on the table from KKR and Stefano Pessina, the company’s deputy chairman and 15 per cent shareholder.
In reports that further suggest deteriorating relations between the protagonists, it is suggested that the Terra Firma-led consortium will strip Boots of valuable assets. These reports, it is thought, emanate from advisers close to the KKR/ Pessina camp. Each side appears to be accusing the other of plotting a Boots break-up that is against the interest of thousands of workers.
The Terra Firma grouping is expected to start due diligence at the City offices of the law firm Slaughter and May as early as tomorrow. The exercise could last a fortnight. It has hired Lehman Brothers, Gleacher Shacklock and Avington for financial advice, and Weil, Gotshal & Manges for legal work. A debt package is being finalised by Lehman with support from HBOS and HSBC and about five other banks.
Meanwhile Celesio, of Germany, which trades under the Lloyds brand, is sitting on the sidelines, “weighing up its options”, according to a source close to the group, on whether to join forces with Terra Firma or another private equity firm.
Terra Firma is one of several firms considering the possible acquisition of 26 BUPA hospitals for about £1.25 billion.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Have the Board of Boots gone mad! why on earth pay any break fee to a bidder - supported by the board or not. The shareholders ought to ask for the 10 p per share equivalent of the break fee to be paid to them out of the directors own pockets.
Iain, London,
Why should any bidder, who is, after all, a free agent, be paid any fee at all by the target company's shareholders if another bidder's offer if preferred. ? This "spvish" behaviour is increasingly prevalent and it costs the shareholders money and enriches only the equity funds who are not interested in a business but only in trying to make a "quick buck", The procedure should be banned by the take over panel or company law.
S. Kipotim, reading, England
This kind of break fee was highlighted in Barbarian at the Gates where KKR were again persuaded to keep their offer open on the table for 2 more hours beyond the deadline whilst the board discussed the offer - the fee for this was £20Mn!
Nicholas Fraser, Hatfield, UK
My view is that KKR went into this with the intention of making a fast buck. They were obviously aware that the offer would instigate other bidders, ' in their interest ', having a greater manufacturing need for the Boots company, without an assets stripping intent.
Their (KKR) view was one of a win/win scenario whereby should they lose the deal they would gain from the 'break clause' whereas should they win they could ' break-up' the company for fast gains. Either way they couldn't lose.
I think the authorities should demand copy of their expenses in compiling the deal, which could then be analysed to see if they were justified and true.
That is my opinion , not based on fact.
Alex Williams, Bristol, U.K
i consider it outrageous that there should be any question of ANY payment to any bidder . Surely in this case any bidder does so at its own risk and expense.
Surely they are gamblig on making a very fat killing indeed.
peter quayle, alderley edge,