James Rossiter and Siobhan Kennedy
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
The group representing Britain's social housing industry is in talks with the Government to free £1 billion of public money to help to bail out the new homes market.
The funds would be used to buy tens of thousands of mostly inner-city flats and family homes at a heavy discount from beleaguered housebuilders.
These properties were originally expected to be sold to private buyers but are now part-built or empty as the sector struggles to deal with the sharpest slump in sales for more than a generation.
The proposal from the National Housing Federation (NHF), the umbrella body for the UK's housing associations, is under consideration by ministers at the Treasury and the Department for Communities and Local Government. If the package is agreed, it could kickstart the moribund housing market by buying at least 10,000 units. That would help the big housebuilders, whose share prices have collapsed over recent weeks amid fears that they will be unable to service their debts as cashflow dries up.
The proposals could also assist the Government, whose target to build three million new homes by 2020, including hundreds of thousands of units of social housing, is in tatters.
The package also includes proposals to allow housing associations to buy homes from families in danger of having their property repossessed.
David Orr, chief executive of the NHF, is due to meet Caroline Flint, the Housing Minister, to discuss the funding proposal early next week.
The £1 billion of funding has already been agreed as part of an £8.4billion three-year budget of taxpayers' money set by the Government and ready for gradual allocation to the Housing Corporation, its social housing quango. The funds are in place for spending by housing associations between April 2008 and April 2011, but the sudden collapse in the market since the spring has left housing associations frozen out from about £1billion of this year's expected £2.5billion spend, as housebuilders have simply stopped building homes.
Mr Orr said: “The £1 billion could be used in more innovative way to buy unsold stock, incomplete developments and land - at varying rates of discount.”
Each year about half the country's new social housing stock is built to order by housebuilders as part of their private housing sales sites. Planning approval is granted to builders on sites only if they allocate on average 30 per cent of their stock for affordable and social housing, which is then sold off-plan to housing associations.
However, most of the big housebuilders, including Barratt Developments, Taylor Wimpey and Persimmon, have stopped building on any new sales site over the past few months. The mortgage drought has caused reservations on new homes to fall by between 30 per cent and 50 per cent compared with a year ago.
That move means at a stroke that about 20,000 of the 45,000 flats and houses earmarked for social housing this year will most likely not get built, industry experts predict. Mr Orr wants to use public funds earmarked for buying this supply of social housing, now effectively in limbo, to be used to buy directly from housebuilders tens of thousands of homes built or part-built for private buyers which housebuilders can not currently sell.
Housing starts in total this year are on course to fall to between 100,000 and 110,000 new units, down from about 164,000 housing starts in 2007 and the lowest level since 1945.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
People did not want to buy flats.. and at well over -inflated prices. If the builds they were left with were bungalows or houses I would be surprised. Why should the tax payer bail out an industry that was greedy and got as many units as they could on a micro size plot for the maximum money. No Way
Maggie, West Midlands, UK
C Smith of Norwich hit the nail on the head. I bought a new build in 2005, split up with the girlfriend and could not afford the mortgage on my own so was forced to sell. However, due to the chavs that were living in other new builds nearby (thanks to the Govt) found it hard to attract buyers.
Luke, Essex, UK
This is simply obscene.
The government has the power to buy up agricultural land and build houses at virtually cost price. Approx 50k per home. Why should we pay the likes of Barratts 250k?
The developers gambled big and lost. The tax payer must not bail them out.
A Harris, Kettering, UK
Tax payers money to bail out the house builders - shameless! Better to give tax cuts to the poorest so that they can spend their income on the property they want rather than reverting to Stalinist central planning. Better yet leave it to the market to set the new much lower prices!
Father Ignatius Brown, London, UK
So if I am struggling to pay for a flat I have just bought in one of these developments I can expect to have a host of single mothers with screaming babies and pushchairs moved in next to me, with the added delight of their feckless boyfriends. And I'm taxed to pay for them too!
Love you Gordon.
C Smith, Norwich, UK
The Government has done enough to fuel the housing bubble - a rapid price correction is needed and Government meddling to slow the correction will only perpetuate a false market.
James, London, England
Labour seem to be trying to waste as much money as possible to keep the housing bubble inflated. They know they will soon be on their way, so it won't be their mess. They are just digging as big a hole as possible for the next government.
Fred, Moray, Scotland
Take away the gloss of the terracotta tiles and the cedar panelling and what we are left with are properties that they tried to coax us to live in 40 years ago. Sell them to the Housing Associations and watch how quick the concrete boxes show there true colours.
steve, york, UK
Hold on a second: weren't we told for the last 5 years that lack of supply to meet rocketing demand was the root cause of the house price boom? Yet now it seems no-one wants the newly built houses and flats after all. Could it possibly all just have been a speculative bubble driven by cheap credit?
MB, Edinburgh,
The idea of part buy part own (blatently what is in mind here) only serves to maintain unrealistic prices. These schemes benefit no one.
A responsible approach to the housing market would be to limit the number of homes you can own and to re-introduce the fair rent act. It ain't rocket science!!!
Ozzy, Brighton, UK
Whilst the residential market was over valued prior to the credit crunch the current crisis enveloping house builders has the potential to bring virtually every house hold in this country to its knees.
Any scheme which could help bring normality back should be tried albeit this is late in the day.
Antony Hughes, London,
James from Bristol has hit the nail on the head. These flats and houses are vacant for a reason. There is simply no demand at the price level. And this plan is a sham excuse for giving taxpayers money to housebuilders. Another temporary prop for the housing market. Tax relief on interest next?
Michael, London,
I'm sure that all of the unsold flats could easily be sold to private buyers, but not for anything like 2007 prices.
Rob, London, UK
Elsewhere your correspondents say that it is vital for the Government to maintain fiscal responsibility during the current financial crisis.
Where is the money coming from?
Borrowings or Tax?
If Borrowings we have irresponsibility.
If tax we have political suicide.
Perhaps a tax on MP's exes.
Stephen Green, Correns, France
The housing market is far too big for the government to have any lasting impact on its direction, but they could easily waste huge sums attempting to prove that they are 'doing something'.
Better to have a rapid correction than a long period of stagnation as houses find their sustainable value.
Tom Archer, Saffron Walden,
Attempting to prop up the property bubble - that will help people who cannot afford a home!
Why do we delude ourselves into thinking unaffordable housing makes people richer. It makes everyone poorer.
Let prices collapse, I will be much happier in a much bigger house 'worth nowt'.
Alex, Nottingham, UK
Inner City "Luxury apartments" - the slums of the future.
Michael Abdad, Leicester, UK
The best for the government to do is to stay away from the housing market. Let the builders and state agents go broke. That will teach them and the prices will come down to levels we can afford. No rocket science.
Fabio C, London, UK
So let's get this straight. The housing market is grossly inflated so the government is going to take money off me in taxes to prop up this market and thus ensure that homes will remain expensive and I'll have even less money to afford one. Of course, the work shy and feckless can take their pick.
John, London,
Live Off the State!
And provide job's for people not "Normally" employable within the "Housing Reality"!
Cut the "Quango's, who will administer such a scheme!
Let the "Free Market/Democracy Prevail, rather than "Job's for the "Boy's". The PFI iniative should be as for "Pensions"!
Paul, Newtown,Powys, UK
If these newly-built flats and houses are vacant then either there was no demand for them in the first place or the price is too high. I was sceptical about the need for such a large increase in the house-building programme but I do welcome a reduction of price back to long-term earning multiples
James, Bristol,