Suzy Jagger in New York and Gary Duncan
Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition
One of Washington’s senior senators urged the US Government last night to block the $700 billion (£378 billion) rescue package for the banks, which would be the biggest bailout since the Great Depression.
Senator Richard Shelby, the leading Republican on the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs, said in a statement that the Treasury’s proposal was “neither workable nor comprehensive”.
Fears that the intense political haggling will delay a vote and put a stop to the entire bailout triggered renewed sell-offs across equity and currency markets on both sides of the Atlantic yesterday.
In New York, the Dow Jones industrial average plunged 372.80 points to 11,015.70. In London, the FTSE 100 index ended off 75 points at 5,623.3. The dollar plunged 2 per cent against the euro to three-week lows.
In a statement, the senator said: “I am concerned that the Treasury’s proposal is neither workable nor comprehensive, despite its enormous price tag. In my judgment, it would be foolish to waste massive sums of taxpayer funds testing an idea that has been hastily crafted, and may actually cause the Government to revert to an inadequate strategy of ad hoc bailouts. Given that markets have recently taken confidence in the prospect of government involvement, I believe Congress must immediately undertake a comprehensive, public examination of the problem and alternative solutions rather than swiftly pass the current plan with minimal changes or discussion. We owe the American taxpayer no less.”
Mr Shelby’s position represents a severe blow to Henry Paulson, the US Treasury Secretary and architect of the rescue, who had hoped the required legislation would be passed on Friday, but has been overwhelmed by lawmakers in Washington who are bickering among themselves to have their measures included in the Bill.
Mr Paulson believes that without the speedy rescue package, the American banking system faces meltdown. In a worrying development, other struggling American industries outside Wall Street began to ask for similar assistance. Measures adopted at the end of last week to stem banking share price falls by banning short-selling temporarily, were requested by car and real estate companies.
Barney Frank, a Democrat and chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, yesterday managed to secure that the Government will have the authority to seize stakes in banks seeking to benefit from the bailout. Mr Frank also gave warning that any agreement on the legislation could drag on into next week.
Mr Frank also urged Mr Paulson to include in the bailout Bill the right for Washington to limit executive pay awarded to banks that benefit from the rescue package.
Other Democrats want bankruptcy judges to be able to force mortgage lenders to lower the interest charged on a home loan, to help householders to keep their property.
Republicans, scared by plans effectively to nationalise part of Wall Street, are demanding an overhaul of the regime regulating financial services in America and also checks on the way that the Treasury manages the colossal bailout fund.
Mr Paulson wants to create a federal fund into which troubled banks can sell distressed assets at a discount, to be funded entirely by the American taxpayer. The former chief executive of Goldman Sachs hopes that once the banks have rid themselves of such toxic securities, they will start lending to one another again and avert a collapse of the US financial system.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Of course oil is up when stocks are down. When people sell their stocks, they buy commodities with the cash. Oil is up, so is gold, so are the other commodities. What do you want investors who sell stocks to do with those funds? Hide it under their matresses?
Joseph, New York City, USA
Just a follow up comment, but more proof that speculators are pushing up oil price and not demand. No money to put in to backing short bets so money in to oil = biggest one day gains in history? Am I being cynical?
Alistair Kipling, Birmingham,
Somebody please have the courage to say "No".
What's a bank here or there. There used to be a thing called liquidity ratio. Who let the rules slide? So long as customers deposits are protected does anyone really care if a few noughts are added to the books to pump up egos?
michael, brightlingsea, england
Re-arranging the deckchairs on the Titanic........
RB, Aberdeen,
I think calling an 80 point drop a 'dive' is a slight over-dramatisation in an already sensitive situation, don't you? Although there is certainly something real going on, the media is a big part of all this panic.
James, Beijing, China
There must be some way to curb oil speculators, not much point in a recovery if oil goes above 100 $, this is crazy, jim
jim, donegal, Ireland
Typical 'shoot first - ask questions later' policy - just like everything cowboy Bush does.
sam, london,
Housing in the US and the UK is overpriced. Throwing taxpayers money to prop them up is absurd and doomed to failure. We cannot afford these prices. It would be better to let the bubble burst and use the trillion dollars to mop up the mess and set up a new financial system from the wreckage.
Simon, London, UK
the article makes reference to both Republican and Democrat efforts to attach conditions to the bailout plan.
'Paul Lennon' (a mix of Paul McCartney and John Lennon?) who claims to be from Edgware, London lays the blame squarely with the Democrats in congress. Partisan political activist perhaps?
Linus, London, UK
Hey buddy can you spare 7 Trillion dimes ?
I wonder where Mr Paulson invested the $500 million he received tax free when he left Goldman Sachs and joined the US Government.
Dr Richard Bruce, Cape Town, South Africa
The politicians will be punished.. the Republicans and Labour will pay soon enough.
Ian, portsmouth,
Did I hear correctly when they said that the US Government were trying to get 40 billion pounds from the markets to support AIG?
If so they are in more serious trouble than we thought.
Austin Tassletine, South West , UK
"Giving $700 billion to gambling addicts is not the answer... "
Exactly. It is completely counterproductive, like so many of the quick fixes of the Bush fiasco.
Peter, Liverpool, UK
Not to worry Our Great Leader the Lord of No More Boom & Bust speaks to us soon and he will reveal that the trick of raising Lazarus from the dead will pale into insignificance when he and Ali- the-stare do the Houdini of all Houdini's and take us all to the promised land of plenty.
Plenty of what?
Mike O Connor, Plymouth,
The idea that people should be punished sounds good in principle.
However it also carries the suggestion that the authorities did not know of the problem or did not know how to fix it.
That sounds to me like the politicians.
Robert Good, Freetown, Sierra Leone
Finally the administration is desperate enough to move the conversation to the chambers of Congress. A package will pass, but not without a new regulatory regime for Wall Street and mortgage reform for Main Street. Eight years of Republican "leadership" leaves the US friendless, bruised and broke.
Ray, New York, USA
The markets need to be left alone.
Government both sides of the Atlantic - leave the market alone. It is not there to consume vast quantities of taxpayer - and non-investor - money. It has it's own mechanism which worked beautifully last week.
Let the market fail, and re-balance on its own.
Laura Roberts, London, UK
Would you give a kilo of heroin to a drug addict? No! Giving $700 billion to gambling addicts is not the answer... This will NOT calm things down - they'll get their fix and then want more.
The markets need to be calmed down by controlled delivery of recovery funds - give the market 'hope'.
mark, Kawasaki, Japan
This is just typical of this do nothing Democratic Congress. They should all be voted out in November.
Paul Lennon, Edgware, UK
There are ways to protect the US taxpayer without bailing out leading financial firms. Let the firms approach the US and swap debt for equity. This is what has happened to morgan staley and AIG. Make it open and very favourable to the tax payer. Firms will have the choice, accept or stand alone.
Stephen O'Mara, Tamworth, Australia
The banks created this mess. They must be heavily penalised. The ability to trade short must be taken away from them and others. The Derivatves market for banking, investment and other loan sharks must be closed until there is new heavily punative legislation. Fines in Bn's, bonuses taxed at 99.9%.
IP, Reading,
And the biggest winner of the bail out is likely to be ...Goldman Sachs! - Paulson's old firm.
Most banks will get much less, as they have not marked down so much as they have less dodgy lending.
Paulson also asks to be above the Courts, with no legal review of his decisions allowed.
Shameless scam.
David Martin, Bristol, UK
US is slowly going down...
Alex Mesh, Beijing, China
"Republicans, scared by plans effectively to nationalise part of Wall Street..."
Neither the Republicans or the Democrats are "scared" by nationalization of Wall Street. The "collapse" is orchestrated to usher a stable global currency into the market. There is no free market economy.
Jennifer, Granbury, TX/USA
If the financial system that the western world works under was based on sound finacial principles that one would expect instead of a mystery of products based on massive debt lending, there would be not crisis. Thefinancial system has been corrupted for some time it appears.
Jim Wills, Brisbane, Australia