Tom Bawden in New York
The man, the films, those blondes. Free DVD collection starting this Sunday
Morgan Stanley yesterday became the latest financial services group to fall
victim to a rogue trader as it admitted that it had suspended a credit
trader in London for trying to hide losses of about $120 million (£61.3
million).
America’s second-biggest securities firm said that the Financial Services
Authority was conducting a full investigation into the conduct of an unnamed
employee - understood to be London-based Matt Piper – after Morgan Stanley
discovered in May what it called a “$120 million negative adjustment to
marks previously taken in a trader’s book that did not comply with the
firm’s policies”.
The markdown is thought to relate to short-term trading in credit index
options that may date back as far as last year. The trades are believed be
in CDX indices, complex derivatives used to hedge risk on credit investments
such as bonds. Morgan Stanley declined to comment on the identity of the
rogue trader.
The presence of a rogue trader emerged as Morgan Stanley reported a 60 per
cent decline in its second-quarter profits, dragged down by a $955 million
loss on its portfolio of mortgage-related investments and loans to finance
private equity buy-outs. The group declared net income of $1.03 billion in
the three months to June, down from $2.58 billion a year earlier but
slightly above expectations.
The decline in profits came despite a one-off gain of nearly $1.5 billion from
the sale of its Spanish wealth-management business and a secondary offering
of shares in MSCI Barra, a provider of data for hedge funds and other
indices in which Morgan Stanley is the majority shareholder.
Morgan Stanley’s figures were also pulled down by $245 million in costs
related to 3,000 job cuts since October and by poor results in its trading
and investment banking, which includes underwriting and merger advice.
Peter Kenny, managing director at Knight Equity Markets, an asset manager in
New Jersey, said: “I don’t think the Morgan Stanley numbers were bad news at
all. The results are mundane, but it’s a welcome mundane. There didn’t
appear to be anything shocking in there at first look. We’re only seeing a
small decline in the shares – we’ve seen a lot worse in the past few months.”
Morgan Stanley’s net revenues, or total revenue minus interest, fell by 38 per
cent, from $11.5 billion in last year’s second quarter, to $6.5 billion this
year. Colm Kelleher, the group’s chief financial officer, said: “This has
been an unusually stressful quarter.”
John Mack, the group chief executive, said: “Difficult market conditions and
lower levels of client activity impacted our results, particularly in fixed
income and asset management . . . However, Morgan Stanley’s diversified
business mix benefited the firm, with solid results in wealth management,
prime brokerage [services to hedge funds], equity derivatives and our
world-class international franchise.”
Morgan Stanley’s shares closed up 10 cents at $40.69, having fallen earlier as
investors worried about the outlook for the underlying business in a tough
market, despite the results being slightly ahead of expectations.
The group’s institutional securities business, which includes capital markets
and investment banking, reported a 77 per cent decline in profits to $679
million. Revenues in the global wealth management unit rose by 48 per cent,
with profits
nearly quadrupled at $989 million, as Morgan Stanley benefited from a $748
million gain from the sale of its Spanish unit. With that sale stripped out,
the division’s revenue rose by 4 per cent for the period, to $1.7 billion.
The asset management division reported a $227 million loss as revenues fell
68 per cent to $488 million.
Morgan Stanley reported its figures a day after Goldman Sachs cheered the
markets with an 11 per cent fall in its second-quarter profit, better than
expected. Last week, Lehman Brothers kicked off the second-quarter reporting
season among financial groups by unveiling a much larger than expected $2.8
billion loss.
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles

Overseas contacts and local business information

Find a course, arrange a game and save money
2007
£47,700
2007
£41,899
2008
£41,445
Great car insurance deals online
£25,510 – 32,000
Transport for London
London
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£90,000 + PRP
Essex County Council
Essex
100K
Confidential
London
5% below developer pre-launch price!
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Great Investment, River Views
By Funway – Thailand
from £589pp
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
"Government regulation"? Regulation by a Government that can't balance its own books, and which has pushed us to the head of the line in deficit finance? The same Government that had its eye off the ball when Northern Rock went down? That Government?
jon livesey, Sunnyvale, CA/USA
Hmm lets see now, the financial markets are mature and don't need Government regulation?
Dave, Chorley,