Siobhan Kennedy
The man, the films, those blondes. Free DVD collection starting this Sunday
What did the Bank of England do yesterday?
The Bank has announced a “special liquidity scheme” to try to get the money markets moving and boost confidence. Under the plan, Britain’s banks and building societies can cumulatively swap up to £50 billion worth of mortgage assets and credit card debt in return for Treasury bills — special bonds backed by the Government — for a fee. The bonds can then be exchanged for cash in the money markets. The bonds became available yesterday and banks have six months to swap them for their mortgages. The bonds will be issued for up to a year but can be extended for up to three years. Only AAA-rated mortgage assets, credit card debt and certain soverign paper is eligible to be swapped as part of the scheme. Mortgages linked to the US sub-prime market are not acceptable.
Why has the Bank had to do this now?
The purpose is to get the banks to start lending to each other and their customers again. Because of the knock-on effects of the credit crunch, banks have become very wary of issuing loans and interbank lending has virtually dried up. This has had a disastrous effect on the mortgage market with several banks and building societies being forced to raise their rates and reduce the amount of products on offer to first-time buyers. This has led to downward pressure on house prices, which in turn has hurt consumer spending and the wider economy. Mervyn King, the Governor of the Bank of England, said the situation has been bad for some time but became markedly worse last month. It is hoped that banks will be more willing to lend if borrowing banks pledge them government bonds — not mortgages — as collateral.
Is taxpayers’ money at risk?
In theory it is, although Mr King insists the risk to the taxpayer is “negligible” and that any losses in the value of the assets would stay with the banks. For the taxpayer to be vulnerable, Mr King says a bank would have to collapse and simultaneously house prices would have to fall dramatically and defaults rise. In that scenario the Bank would be left holding the mortgage assets on its own balance sheet with the taxpayer sitting on any losses. However, the Bank has put in place a series of protective cushions. First, it is charging the banks a fee for the service. It is also demanding a higher amount of mortgage assets in exchange for the bonds. For example, the Bank would demand £120 million in mortgage-backed securities for a bond worth £100 million. In addition, if the value of the assets does fall at any time during the three-year period, Mr King has told the banks they must replace the lower-quality assets with higher-quality ones.
Is £50 billion enough to solve the banks’ problems?
No. The £50 billion on offer is a drop in the ocean when it comes to the banks’ mortgage assets and Mr King himself said yesterday that sum could easily be soaked up in the first month or two. Analysts said the sum equated to about 10 per cent of banks’ wholesale funding needs of £550 billion and less than 5 per cent of the total outstanding mortgage stock of nearly £1.2 trillion. Mr King insisted that the size of the available scheme was open-ended, although it would not be a bottomless pit. He also said it was possible for banks to include traditional mortgage loans held on their balance sheets that have not yet been securitised, which would dramatically increase the size of the collateral pool. Mr King also emphasised that the scheme is restricted to collateral that existed before 2008 and was therefore not designed to encourage new lending.
Doesn’t this amount to another massive bailout for the banks, just like the rescue of Northern Rock?
On some level it does, because the Bank is having to rescue the banks from a situation that they cannot resolve on their own. But Mr King insists that his actions are not designed to protect the banks; rather they are intended to protect the rest of the economy from the failings of the banks. By boosting liquidity in the markets, the aim is to allow the banks to start doing what they are supposed to do — lending money. He says the bonds will not be allowed to be used by failing institutions and can only be given to healthy banks to help to ease the pressures in the money markets.
Will the Bank of England’s actions ease the mortgage market and help first-time buyers?
The Bank’s actions should help to ease the tight conditions in the interbank lending market and encourage the banks to start lending again. That will enable some of the bigger banks and building societies to offer a wider range of mortgage products, but there is no guarantee that lenders will lower the costs of their mortgages to customers. In fact yesterday, Abbey, the third-largest mortgage provider, raised its rates by up to 0.61 per cent. For the mortgage market to be stimulated further, and the cost of mortgages to fall, Mr King would need to cut interest rates again next month by at least another 25 basis points, analysts said. Even if interest rates are cut, however, there is no expectation that mortgage rates will go back to the hugely discounted levels seen last year and house prices are expected to continue to fall.
What's on offer
For £1,000 of AAA-rated mortgage securities, a bank receives:
— Under three years to maturity: £880 (12 per cent discount)
— Three to five years to maturity: £860 (14 per cent discount)
— Five to ten years to maturity:
— £830 (17 per cent discount)
— Ten to thirty years to maturity: £780 (22 per cent discount)
Banks face a total discount of up to 27 per cent for the highest-risk products allowable under the scheme
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles

Overseas contacts and local business information

Find a course, arrange a game and save money
2007
£47,700
2007
£41,899
2008
£41,445
Great car insurance deals online
£25,510 – 32,000
Transport for London
London
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£90,000 + PRP
Essex County Council
Essex
100K
Confidential
London
5% below developer pre-launch price!
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Great Investment, River Views
By Funway – Thailand
from £589pp
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Beth - yes Nulabour are hopeless and washed up. But the idea is sound *and* has not come from the politicians! It's needed to make the whole banking system - which we all need - trust me!
Tom, London, UK
I'm amazed people are using the word 'consumer', 'mortgages' and this story in the same sentence. There's no way this will have any tangible effect on mortgage lending to consumers.
The banks will breathe a slight sigh of relief from the burden of (even AAA with the current form of housing stock prices) precarious mortgage securities, and there's no way they'll think, "Hey, that makes us feel better, lets go back and take on more precarious debt in the shape of more 90+% mortgages".
This is a gesture for one thing, it's a mega shortsighted ploy to attempt to keep the boom or bust (aka feelgood factor if you listen to the Labour muppets) fuelled housing market burning.
With the astronomical level of debt hedged against overvalued housing stock, any form of crash, would be devastating on a scale never seen before, that's the reason they're trying to dampen the fall.
Never have I seen a leader so devoid of logic as Brown, Politically, he's a dead man walking.
Beth, Sheffield, UK,
50 billion is just under £1000 per person for the whole of the UK. If the BoE said to me "We'll give you £10 for every £100 you repay on your mortgage between now and the end of the month" it would have cost them just £300 - I paid off £3000 from my mortgage at the weekend. My money, my debt!
chris lee, melbourne,
A cynic might raise the possibility that our disgraced banks might off-load their 'dodgy' loans on to the British tax payers.
But if Mr Darling says that only AAA credit card debt and mortgages will be swapped, we must believe him.
After all, he is a man of undithering integrity.
As is Gordon Brown --- and even Tony Blair. ( remember him)
jinette bond, morecambe, england
When are the banks actually going to bring down their mortgage rates??? This would enable first time buyers to afford a mortgage whilst house prices remain steady. Infact it is a good time for first time buyers now - when things start moving again, there will be more demand for property, the sellers will once again have the upper hand and the prices will start rising again.....
E Baroudi, London, United Kingdom
I have a question ro ask. What would be the position today if we had joined the Euro? Would the UK economy have been left to sink or swim without help from the European Central Bank? Watching the Euro's strength against Sterling ,I was starting to think that the UK was foolish not to have joined. I am now not so sure and that we we were after all wise not to have joined.
Michael Bowden, Christchurch, Dorset
Things have to be bad if the BOE is taking credit card debts off banks. Sounds like Argentina to me. What happened to capital requirements over the past few years, what on earth were bank regulators doing? Actually, Northern Rock showed the answer to that one - they were out to lunch, not that that stopped them from picking up their bonuses.
Christopher H, Canberra, Australia