Christine Seib and Amanda Andrews
2 for 1 tickets to Casablanca, this coming Monday

Northern Rock's shareholders were furious last night over the Chancellor's decision to nationalise the troubled bank, effectively rendering their shares worthless.
The Treasury now faces expensive and lengthy legal action from enraged institutional and retail investors.
Meanwhile, Sir Richard Branson said that his Virgin group would make no further attempt to rescue the bank after his £1.25 billion offer was rejected by the Government. Members of the management team that had also submitted an offer were waiting to learn last night how long they would keep their jobs in the nationalised bank.
Trading in Northern Rock shares will be suspended. At about 3.30pm today the Chancellor will give details to the Commons on the nationalisation, which is expected to take place within days. So far, the Treasury has refused to say how many jobs will be lost from the bank or how long it will be in public ownership. Bankers involved in the deal described Alistair Darling’s decision to abandon the auction of the bank as an “astonishing failure”. One said: “Darling has to go.”
The UK Shareholders’ Association, which represents 100,000 small shareholders in Northern Rock, said that Mr Darling’s decision to abandon negotiations with the two commercial bidders was akin to theft. Roger Lawson, director of the association, said: “It seems the only reason that the Government has chosen nationalisation is because ‘it offers better value to the taxpayers’. This is equivalent to a thief telling you it offers better value to him to steal from you than to enter into a commercial transaction with you.”
The association vowed to use any legal option to block nationalisation. SRM Global, the hedge fund that is Rock’s largest shareholder, has already threatened to sue the Government if it does not offer investors compensation of 400p a share. SRM and the RAB hedge fund have invested £150 million in Rock for a stake of nearly 20 per cent. One institutional investor said: “This is clearly disappointing and shouldn’t have been necessary.”
The Chancellor said that he would appoint an independent arbitration panel to value the bank and calculate any compensation due. This process could take months and Mr Darling has already told investors that the valuation would be conducted as if Rock had never received government assistance. Shareholders said that without the government guarantee on accounts or the estimated £25 billion emergency loan from the Bank of England, Rock is effectively bust, rendering their investments valueless. Robin Ashby, of the Northern Rock Small Shareholders’ Association, described Mr Darling’s decision as “appalling”.
Peter Montagnon, of the Association of British Insurers, which represents Britain’s largest shareholders, said that nationalising Rock could make it harder for UK banks to raise money by issuing corporate bonds. He said: “We will have to look for any arrangements for compensating shareholders and it is also important that the rights of bondholders are respected. If not, we could see a reduced willingness in the bond market to fund banks. We will be watching very closely what happens to bondholder rights.”
Angela Knight, chief executive of the British Bankers’ Association, said that Mr Darling’s dithering over Rock had harmed the reputation of the UK’s financial services sector. “A decision should have been reached much earlier, as this has not helped the perception of the industry,” she said.
The Chancellor rejected rival offers by the Branson consortium and the Rock management because he believed that they posed too high a risk to taxpayers and involved too much public subsidy for funding the bank in the next three years. Virgin’s offer, he complained, would offer a return for the Government only after the bank was worth £2.7 billion, while the management team’s proposal required the Government to maintain its guarantee of Northern Rock’s deposits for too long.
Last night Sir Richard said: “We put all the resources of Virgin’s senior management team on this for five months and, we believe, had a very strong proposal.”
A source with knowledge of the consortium’s bid said that the £2.7 billion target was not over-optimistic, given that the Virgin consortium planned to inject £1.25 billion into Rock and that Rock has a present market capitalisation of almost £400 million.
Sources close to the management said it is to stay on for a handover to Ron Sandler, the former Lloyd’s of London chief executive chosen by the Treasury to lead a nationalised Rock.
Virgin and the management will have their bid costs met by the Government up to £5 million, but both are thought to have run up higher bills.
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love.
Have you ever dreamed of owning your own racehorse or a beautiful painting?
Enjoy comfort, safety, space and great design. Plus enter our great competition
Allow Times Online TV show, Perfect Pets help you make the the right pet decisions
Are you California dreaming? Explore the wonders of the Golden State. Also enter our fantastic competition
Do you have what it takes to be a Times photographer?
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
Find out to make the most of your money with our wealth management guides
Need help with your property? We have an entire how to guide - buying, selling, letting, moving, to help you
We are seeking entries for the inaugural Sunday Times Best Green Companies Awards
Enjoy some wonderful inspiring wildlife moments
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

Join by May 15 to win BMW PGA Championship tickets
2007/07
£57,500
South East England
2007/07
£40,995
South East England
2006/06
£41,995
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
£40-55k+benefits+uncapped commission
Morgan Keating
South East
£60k plus excellent benefits
Barclaycard
Stockton / Northampton
£
£55,000 - £75,000 plus bonus and benefits
Diligenta
Based in Peterborough
£45,000 - £70,000 plus bonus and benefits
Diligenta
Based in Peterborough
Globrix, the property search engine
Visit Times Online Property for homes for sale or rent
Residential development site with planning permission
£1,500,000
Mortgages, bank accounts & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Dinarobin Hotel Golf & Spa 7 nights
From £1830 per person – saving £530.
Walking & multi-activity holidays in Cauterets. Stylish self-catering apartments.
From 350€ for 7 nights.
Walt Disney World Resort Florida SALE!
From £619 per person!
andy good comment!
yeah agree completely, the hedge funds made money by the government intervening, and they want to sue?!
please will somebody just say hedge funds aren't institutional investors. They are rich people put together to play the stock market. Whoever plays the stock market get the last say in any dealings, and that where the hedge funds should be placed. Institutional pff
mark, bradford,
I bet £10 on Arsenal to beat Man Utd this weekend. I intend to personally sue Alistair darling if he doesnt give me £4.00 in compensation. I dont see why Wenger should take any blame and I hope he gets his full bonus.
e skelton, cardiff, uk
Just a thought, but does this mean that all the staff at Northern Rock will become civil servants? and if so, will they then qualify for civil servant pay grades? the average Northern Rock employee would be up for a massive pay rise!
Chester, cambridge,
I am or was a Northern Rock Shareholder, I had everything that I have in Northern Rock and more. Yes, perhaps to some extent I was speculating in my investment but investments usually go up, as well as down but this company was snatched from shareholders. I do believe if this company had been given a fair chance, it would have recovered in the private sector in a short time. People talk of 24 billion of debts but they neglect the fact that the last time Rock posted profits these were of the order of 500 million, in these terms the debts really are not that great. It has no or little of a sub prime mortgage market and they are are the countries biggest mortgage provider.
I personally live on a housing association estate with massive social problems and I took the risk with this share because I wished to get out of here and it presented a way of moving forward it seems. Im hardly some rich speculator that the media and people portray us as, I have lost all the money I have in the world
sean, leeds, Yorks
"Shareholders said that without the government guarantee on accounts or the estimated £25 billion emergency loan from the Bank of England, Rock is effectively bust, rendering their investments valueless"...
...thus very convincingly stating the argument for the other side!
Tom, Bristol,
You invest, you win, you lose, they lost!
Terry, Newcastle, UK
NR shareholders can't say they haven't had months to consider selling their shares.
There has been a risk of Nationalising the bank since last summer.
Why do these people expect the tax payer to underwrite their investments?
Maybe these shareholders should stick to savings accounts in future.
J Adams, London, England
If the Rock is worthless, let me have it.
No?
Then the company / shares are worth something then.
ps - I would never vote Labour now - Northern Rock? Northern Monkeys more like.
Tim Kodogo, Cambridge,
Shares in Northern Rock are valueless due to poor management of the bank - not because of nationalisation. Shareholders need to remember that it was not the Government that caused their investments to fail.
John, Brighton,
This is Railtrack all over again !!!
Shan Lloyd-Packer, Stroud, UK
If the Government had not supported Northern Rock it would have been bankrupt and the shareholders would have received nothing. They should not be entitled to tax payer's money simply because NR is being nationalised rather than going out of business. As shareholders they should have made sure that the management of NR was acting responsibly. They didn't, and are now facing the consequences of their own failure.
Richard, Manchester,
Does this mean the Hedge funds will start to pay an honest rate of tax ?
andy, petersfield,
Agreed Government should have never got involved - by doing so they kept the company afloat when it shouldn't have been, a decision should have been made in August when this blew up. Unfortunately through the Governments mismanagement RAB and SRM and other shareholders who have purchased under false pretencies do have a claim. Government should never have become involved. Or else should have followed other central banks and released funds to the market earlier. What a mess and how poorly handled by the Governement. The good thing is that Northern Rock is actually worth something, so taxpayers will not lose out in the long run.
Gavin, Auckland, New Zealand
Shareholders in a company limited by its shares?!
They must have agreed to its demutualisation and gained thereby.
They failed to ensure that the company was properly managed
Government should never have become involved in Northern Rock. The 55Billion of our money could have been better spent on the army, buying Airbus, building some high speed railways and nuclear power stations
peter, singapore,
I don't understand the shareholders' complaint. If the government had simply let Northern Rock go into receivership, the shareholders would have received £0.00 per share. In other words, they would have lost 100% of their investment and wouldn't have the least little grounds for complaint.
But now that the government is using our tax money to not only prop up the bank but also to *continue* it and to even pay shareholders a non-zero price for their share, they are all foaming at the mouth and booing. I don't think that's a very honest position for them to take. By rights they have lost their investment. Any residual payout is a bonus.
I really hope that the government will be prohibited from continuing the bank as a state-controlled state-subsidised enterprise by EU regulations and be forced to simply wind down the bank and recoup our money as the mortgage takers pay off their mortgages over the years.
How about that?
Golodh, London, UK
Oh dear. I think Rock Shareholders have been drinking too much of the Kool Aid. The bank was bust ages ago (even before the problems became apparent) and should have been left to fail. Unfortunately there are many more banks right behind NR - the tide just hasn't gone out far enough yet. Nationalisation is the worst possible step as it prevents the system from clearing and preserves unhealthy structures. The real lesson here is to remove the ability of the banking system to create credits (money) via fractional reserve lending and thus stop the counterfeiting that led to this situation in the first place. If the authorities do not take these steps the market will do it for them despite their best efforts - eventually and very painfully.
Bernard Harper, Sydney, Australia
The shares worth worthless on September 13th.Only the funding from the BOE has kept the NR alive.You could have sold them for £12 last year.You wouldn't have been moaning then.Buying shares is always a gamble.
stephen hulton, eure, france
Oh please ... the value of shares may go down as well as up. I suggest the government immediately give the investors a full return on their risk - zero. Voila - done and dusted.
Richard Stevenson, Geneva, Switzerland
yes it has taken far too long but at least the decision means that the first hit will be on those who chose to invest in a company whose management chose the high risk route . While every taxpayer in the UK is a probable loser it would be outragious if any Northern Rock shareholder received one penny.
david rogers, Sydney, Australia
Shareholders? Their shares were worthless before. Time they got real.
Paul, Sydney, Australia
Oh dear, the wheels really have fallen off the NuLab jalopy this time. Get a seat for the Derby match between Westminster and the City, should be better than the Olympics! At £2000 each, tickets are rather expensive though.....
Pfffill, Shanghai, China
The shareholders are "entitled" to what the bank is worth. I don't see any bidders putting a positive value on the bank and there is o way in which the bank could continue operating without government funding. The conclusion therefore is that Northern Rock is bankrupt and share capital is meant to take the first hit in bankruptcy. I would guess that many of those complaining previously held forth about the evils of state subsidies.
Ian, Frederick, USA/MD
Oh dear, the wheels really have fallen off the NuLab jalopy this time. Get a seat for the Derby match between Westminster and the City, should be better than the Olympics! Compulsory tickets at £2000 each are rather expensive though.....
Pfffill, Shanghai, China
So the shareholders are furious are they? Their fury is as nothing compared to the rest of the country, who had no say in the matter of mis-use of taxpayers' money, in order to save face for the incompetent and unelected Brown, whose disastrous financial 'policies' sowed the seeds to bring it all about in the first place.
The Northern Rock albatross should have been allowed to fail, like any other mis-managed company, and the shareholders would do well to remember that "the value of shares may go up or down".
I note the Treasury is being coy about job losses. Is it too much to hope that Brown and his little Darling will be the first?
Maurice Ferrara, Slip End, Bedfordshire, England
They gambled. They lost. End of.
James Roberton, Leeds,
Why are the shareholders complaining? If the government and BoE hadn't bailed out Northern Rock in the first place, it would have gone bust. Then their shares would have been worth nothing, they should be thanking the government. They have to remember investing in shares is a gamble, it carries a risk. As for the greedy hedge funds they deseve absolutely nothing. They were stupid enough to invest in a sinking ship. You win some you lose some.
ricky, coventry, uk