Greg Hurst, Political Correspondent, and Elizabeth Colman
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
Ministers backed down yesterday and gave another £900 million towards a rescue package for workers who lost their pensions when their companies failed.
The move by Peter Hain, the Work and Pensions Secretary, brought to £2.9 billion the total allocated by the Government to the scheme.
The climbdown, after a five-year battle, was hailed by campaigners as a victory, while the pensions industry said it marked the beginning of steps to rebuild confidence in occupational pensions.
Mr Hain announced that about 129,000 people whose final salary schemes failed would have enhanced benefits equal to 90 per cent of those they had been due, in line with a more generous industry-funded protection plan introduced for schemes that failed after 2005.
Ros Altmann, a pensions consultant and former Downing Street adviser who led the pensioners’ campaign, said: “Finally we have won – it is unbelievable. I am delighted, these people really deserve it.”
Another 11,000 people whose schemes were wound up by solvent employers are to receive a similar deal. Pensions paid under the arrangement will be capped at £26,000 a year, but increased annually in line with inflation and enhanced with options to take a tax-free lump sum and early payments for ill health.
Mr Hain gave a further £935 million for pensions enhancement, in addition to £2 billion announced by Gordon Brown in his final Budget as Chancellor in March, which made provision for workers to receive 80 per cent of their pensions.
These sums have been used to supplement £1.7 billion in residual assets held by the collapsed pension schemes.
The Government will take over these assets and pay the workers’ pensions directly, rather than requiring them to buy annuities.
This change was recommended in a report by Andrew Young, the directing actuary, who said the Government could save £300 million by taking over the funds’ investments and paying pensions directly.
The Government had previously undertaken to match any such savings.
His report also justified extending the payments to the 11,000 workers whose schemes were wound up by their solvent companies, saying directors in such cases had met their legal, but not their moral duties to their employees.
Ann Abraham, the Parliamentary Ombudsman, who last year called for a better deal for pensioners affected by the shutdown of their schemes, said the new measures were “broadly equivalent” to the protection scheme introduced from 2005.
However, Ministers were heavily criticised for taking five years to solve the problem.
Michael Leahy, general secretary of Community, the trade union, said the dispute had caused “unnecessary suffering and anguish and undermined public confidence in the UK pension system”.
The climbdown has come too late for some workers who lost their pension.
Marlene Cheshire, 63, was left struggling when her husband, Dave, died two years ago. Mr Cheshire worked for Dexion, a shelving company, for 31 years, but was made redundant in 2003 when the company went bankrupt. The couple were expecting a pension of about £200 a week, but received nothing.
Mrs Cheshire said: “I just burst into tears this morning [when I heard the news]. It’s been a very emotional day. I just wish Dave was here to share it. It’s not fair. I haven’t really had any retirement, I’ve been worried all the time, but there’s been a lot of support.
“The Government should have paid up earlier – maybe it might have helped Dave.”
Mrs Cheshire added: “For two years Dave campaigned, right up until a couple of months before his death. Even after he had radiotherapy, he still went and made speeches.”
Mr Hain said the announcement would bring the controversy to an end, calling it “a just and final settlement” and defended the Government’s role in the saga.
He said: “Although the Government has been criticised over this matter, these are huge amounts and it is right that we have been able to maximise the return from residual assets in the schemes which collapsed so that the public purse has had value for money too.”
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
After 45years of marriage, when we were both aged 75years, my husband divorced me. Neither of us remarried and he has since died. The Teachers Scheme insist that no-one is entitled to a spouse's pension. Why should they be allowed to withold a pension that was contributed to for over 30years? I have been misled, abandoned and robbed.
S.Ferguson, Wirral, Merseyside
I lost some 60% of my pension when my company QA was trasferrerd from the health service in1989 and went bust in 1901.Does the new legislation apply to my pension and if it does how do I apply
ALAN BINGHAM, bromsgrove, worcs
Surely it would be better if pensions had nothing to do with employers. They should raise the pay and let everybody buy their own pension. Government should ensure that everyone is able to do so.
Peter, Simon's Town, South Africa
This in no way restored confidence in pensions. The milking of the pension funds means that I for one received two thirds of the pension I paid for because the rates were reduced to allow for the reduced income.
In many ways those who looked as if they had lost everything are the big winners in that they get 90% with the golden parachute award going to the public sector with 100%. Especially the MP's with 100% of the increase they awarded themselved at the same time they were reducing us to poverty.
Brown claimed to want to make poverty history, well he succeeded in that he has reduced more Britons to poverty than any other British leader in history. How many of those schemes would have collapsed in the first place without Brown hiding his fiscal incompetence by raiding the pension funds. Probably none is the answer.
As for the European state system, it only works because it is propped up by our lavish contributions made more lavish by the outgoing prime minister.
D Cage, Highworth, Wilts, UK
another smoke screen designed to try to take our eyes off the Northern Rock fiasco, Brown's crap ratings and the general credit crunch bad news...always note the timing of any govt bearing gifts.
mario, london, london
Given the miserable history of pensions in the UK, and the ongoing disgraceful level of our state pension system, it's time for a real review of the potential systems available. There are no free lunches and someone has to pay for any system. But any review should take a good hard look at the European 'pay as you go' state systems that appear to work. They do not need a pointless 'pensions industry' and are not related to capricious and unreliable stock exchanges. And yet they provide very decent and reliable pensions for Europeans that are not susceptible to the sort of scandals that have occurred in England, even ones unwittingly created by civil servants with no understanding of the issues. The amounts we are paying out in all sorts of ways to correct the English private system would go a long way to paying for a decent state system. It should be considered carefully.
Colin, Shrewsbury,