Miles Costello
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
More than 135,000 workers who saw the value of their pensions collapse when their employers went bust were celebrating a surprise government rescue package today expected to be worth about £2.9 billion in real terms.
Peter Hain, the Work and Pensions Secretary, told Parliament that the Government would guarantee 90 per cent of the value of a raft of pension schemes at the time their companies collapsed.
The move, which follows a tireless campaign mounted by pressure groups and poverty-stricken pensioners, will be good news for 125,000 workers, including those at the former Allied Steel & Wire and the Danish-owned Maersk shipping line.
These workers saw their pensions wiped out after their previous employers walked away from their obligations when they filed for bankruptcy.
Mr Hain also said that a further 11,000 workers whose employers remained solvent would qualify for the enhanced pensions protection.
The Government's action means that members of the Financial Assistance Scheme (FAS), introduced ten years ago, will now have the same pensions rights as those in the more recent Pension Protection Fund (PPF).
FAS was the official safety net for workers whose schemes went into compulsory wind-up between January 1997 and April 2005.
Despite sustained pressure from campaigners, under FAS the Government would pay out only 80 per cent of a scheme's value, subject to a cap of £12,000.
That will now increase to 90 per cent, with the cap being lifted to £26,000, adjusted in line with inflation.
This will put it on a par with the PPF, the safey net for pensioners as from April 2005.
Both schemes have been much-derided as doing little to protect pensioner poverty or force companies to honour their obligations to their retiring employees.
Pensioner groups had shown their distaste by mounting high-profile demonstrations, including parading naked along Brighton Beach at a Labour Party annual conference.
Mr Hain said that the affected workers had been "cruelly deprived" of their pensions after having "done the right thing" by making financial provision for their lives in retirement.
He said it meant that the Government had commited an extra £3.9 billion of cash, equivalent to £935 million in value now.
Its total commitment of £12.5 billion was worth £2.9 billion in real terms to pensioners, Mr Hain said.
"Although the Government has been criticised over this matter, these are huge amounts and it is right that we have been able to maximise the return from residual assets in the schemes which collapsed so that the public purse has had value for money, too."
The increased protection for pensioners, which follows a report by the Government's own actuary, Andrew Young, this year, was welcomed by high-profile campaigners.
Ros Altmann, head of the Pensions Action Group, said: "This is a fantastic deal for pensioners. It's taken five and a half years, but Peter Hain is to be praised for this. This would not have happened without support from the Opposition, the Tories and Lib Dems. Northern Rock has also made a difference."
Ms Altmann said that the measures "are not perfect". Someone seriously ill but under 60 will not qualify for a penny, she said.
The Conservatives, whose own proposal to set up a Lifeboat Fund for pensioners was blocked this year, welcomed the increased funding but noted that the final details would not emerge until next year.
"Congratulations to all of the campaigners who have spent their own time and money trying to get this Government to right its pensions wrongs," Chris Grayling, the Shadow Work and Pensions Secretary, said.
"We'll be keeping a sharp eye on the DWP over the coming months to make sure they keep their promise to the 125,000 pensioners."
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
It still seems extraordinary to me that the companies whose funds failed were both able to grossly underfund the pension liabilities and able to get their hands on the value of those funds when approaching insolvency, or even before. How on earth the UK ended up with such a fundamentally hopeless regulatory framework for pension funds is hard to imagine, and I hope things are a bit better under the present rules. Why do we never hear any criticism of those who have been so slick in passing an absolutely monstrous bill to the taxpayers to their own benefit? Clever chaps, but strictly in their own interests, not those of the pensioners. In the end we will have a state system like those in Europe and all this nonsense about the stock exchange and trustees will stop.
Colin, Shrewsbury,
It is indeed rather sad that others, who clearly do not understand final salary pension funds, do not, either, understand the problem which has arisen for these most unfortunate people deprived, due to no fault of their own, of their expected pension rights. It is indeed unfortunate, also, that others do not appreciate that no member of a final salary pension scheme, even one being an actuary or a pension specialist, could possibly know the true funding position of their scheme in reality. The true mistakes have been made by the Trustees of such schemes, (who were responsible for the security of their members pension rights), and the schemes' actuaries advising the trustees (and the employers) and who cannot, of course, ever be wrong due to their advice having been based on their assumptions (however optimistic) not having been borne out in practice.
Many advisors, actuaries and others, have "had their snouts in the trough" yet have escaped any true criticism properly due!
John Wild, GAP, FRANCE
Its not over till the fat lady sings, But I can hear her coming onto the stage.
Million, Birmingham, Warwickshire
As usual the onus on the taxpayer to pay those whose pension funds went bust.
Is this right.
Didnt the people who worked for these bust companies realise their company was going bust and needed the pension funds to try and survive. Why didnt they put steps in place to stop these companies dipping their hands in the till a la Maxwell.
I am in agreement with GB and the gov. should not bail these people out.
Louis Blanc, Walsall, UK
I'm I correct in my memory that it was the Thatcher goverernment , in about 1980, that encouraged people to opt out of the the State SERPS and join private pension schemes?
Ray Harrington, Newport, IOW