Suzy Jagger in New York
Win tickets to the ultimate village fete with welly wanging and more
Three Wall Street banks are expected this morning to unveil firm plans to create a $100 billion (£49 billion) bailout fund designed to avert a worsening credit crisis on Wall Street.
Citigroup, JPMorgan and Bank of America (BoA) have agreed to pool together and launch a fund that will buy risky securities backed by mortgages at risk of default.
The plan marks the biggest bailout on Wall Street since 1998, when Alan Greenspan, former Chairman of the US Federal Reserve, pushed seven American investment banks to prevent the Long Term Capital Management hedge fund from collapsing.
Although the three banks have agreed how much they will put into the fund, they were last night still trying to agree who will run it, how long it will exist, and the quality of assets that it will buy. Citigroup is putting the most into the fund.
It is understood that Henry Paulson, the US Treasury Secretary, has tried to help the three banks by urging other Wall Street institutions to join the pool.
Although Citigroup, JPMorgan and BoA are the core banks backing the fund, insiders claimed last night that HSBC and Barclays had also been contacted about whether they were prepared to join the consortium. HSBC is understood to be still considering whether to participate.
Talks began three weeks ago, after Mr Paulson asked senior bankers to devise a plan to prevent a worsening credit crisis. The three core banks suggested the $100 billion fund and discussions took place in Washington, hosted by Robert Steel, UnderSecretary for Domestic Finance.
Wall Street banks fear that as the credit crisis worsens, they will have to sell billions of dollars of securities backed by risky mortgages. That sell-off would flood the market, further depressing the price of those assets and force the banks to admit to big writedowns. As a result, banks nursing those losses would find it even harder to borrow money from each other – which would lead to financial institutions reining in mortgage and credit card lending to ordinary Americans, a move that would threaten US economic growth.
The three banks want to create a mega-fund, which would be called the Master-Liquidity Enhancement Conduit or the “M-LEC”. The fund would buy assets backed by shaky mortgages and prevent the banks from trying to sell them into the open market. Guaranteed by a consortium of the banks, it would sell its own short-term debt.
Citigroup has most at stake. It is the world’s largest holder of structured investment vehicles (Sivs). Sivs are funds that own assets backed by sub-prime mortgages, home loans made to borrowers with low incomes and bad credit histories who are more likely to fall into arrears. Sivs allow banks to invest in these shaky securities - and benefit from their higher returns - without having to account for the assets on their books. Citigroup has nearly $100 billion in seven Sivs. Globally, Sivs had $400 billion in assets at the end of August, according to Moody’s, the rating agency.
Although JPMorgan and Bank of America do not have Sivs, they will put money into the fund and charge it advisory fees.
It is thought that the UK’s Financial Services Authority has been keen to encourage British banks to take part, but it yesterday refused to comment.
The US Treasury and Barclays failed to return calls. Citigroup and HSBC declined to comment.
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers

Overseas contacts and local business information

Find a course, arrange a game and save money
2002/02
£59,995
The Midlands
F/1989
£36,000
Hollingworth At Ombersley
2007/57
£35,000
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
90K plus bonus plus options
Confidential
London
To £28k
Barclaycard
Various (outside London)
£
£40,000 - £50,000 + benefits
Lloyds Pharmacy
Coventry
£38k
Barclaycard
Various Locations
Live in One of London's Most Vibrant Areas
From £249,950
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Has no one noticed that this is illegal?
This is the manipulation of publicly traded instruments by a trust or cartel that wishes to also manipulate its members' balance sheets. It is fraud directed at their shareholders, all of whom have a right to know the true condition their holdings, and is clearly against the law of the United States.
Dennis Burton, Seattle,
Lipstick on a pig is still lipstick on a pig, even if you change the shade from 'SIV' to 'MLEC'. The assets are toxic waste and will remain toxic waste whatever gloss is put on them. This looks like a desperate attempt to get one more round of pass the parcel before the parcel blows up so the banks aren't holding the losses when they are realised.
EB, Slough,
It seems to me that the problem may be just a bit worse than we have been led to believe, if major banks are pooling their money to staunch the flow of mortgage redemptions.
Joe Miller, Sr, Metropolis, Illinois
Whilst $100bn is larger than the space taken by the label may suggest, if it will contain the problem, it would appear a tidy solution.
As the relative opacity of some sovereign funds might fit well with transparency unneeded in such a managed market solution, and as publication of this plan coincides with the announced intention to propose restrictions on the operations of sovereign funds in the US, it could be that some participation by such funds might be a possible quid pro quo for less restriction.
The innovative idea of investment debt waste management could even be extended in time to include some third world debt forgiveness plans.
dr venables preller, Warminster, UK
Pathetic, isn't it. More of our fascist corporatism: privatize the profit, socialize the loss.
John Ryskamp, Berkeley, California