Jenny Davey
Win luxury hampers plus Waitrose vouchers & guidebooks
AT least five top partners at private-equity giant CVC Capital Partners have received record-breaking payouts of £50m each.
The disclosure of the payments will fuel the political furore over the large sums being earned by individuals at the top of the venture capital industry.
The row forced Alistair Darling, the chancellor, to announce radical changes to the capital-gains tax regime in his prebudget report last week.
These will see private-equity groups pay 80% more tax on the huge sums that they earn from their personal stakes in the investment funds they administer, stakes known within the buyout industry as “carried interest”.
It is understood the five would be liable to pay tax at the current, lower rate of 10% on their payouts, rather than the new rate of 18%.
Last week the City buzzed with speculation over a £250m payout to top executives at CVC, which has in recent years invested in such household names as the AA, Debenhams, Kwik-Fit, Halfords and IG Index, the spread-betting chain.
It is thought that the total payout, once other staff are included, could stretch to more than £300m.
The recipients are believed to include Michael Smith, 54, the group’s Leeds-born chairman, as well as Donald Mackenzie, its senior London partner.
The identity of the other recipients is unclear, but industry observers speculated they may include Rob Lucas and Jonathan Feuer, two London partners in their forties and the San Francisco-born Hardy McLain, a co-founder of CVC.
The windfall was paid after CVC group’s third European fund generated impressive annual net returns of more than 40% after fees.
Lucrative deals include a £350m gain from the sale of Kwik-Fit, a UK tyre and exhaust fitter, which was sold to fellow private-equity group PAI for £800m. Other deals included the purchase and sale of IG Index and Halfords, the car-parts retailer.
CVC led a consortium of buyout groups that earlier this year failed in an attempt to buy J Sainsbury, the supermarket chain.
It is regarded as one of the few UK-based private-equity groups, along with Permira, with the ambition to challenge the large American buyout groups on the world stage.
In recent months it has made a big push into Asia, which it sees as the new growth area for its business.
The collapse of the bid was seen by some commentators as the high-water mark of private equity’s ambitions in the UK.
Sainsbury is now the subject of a takeover approach from a group of investors that are backed by the Qatar government.
In an interview with Financial News in 2005, Smith said that when CVC was raising its third fund in 2001, many investors assumed that returns were on their way down.
“The increased competition in private equity and the low underlying growth of corporate stocks meant it was entirely reasonable for investors to expect returns to fall, especially in the large buyout space.
“However, it is quite interesting that this was not the case. “The actual outcome, as demonstrated by our third fund’s portfolio, has been that the large buyout space has outper-formed even more strongly than in the previous cycle, particularly with respect to Europe,” said Smith.
CVC is one of the top five private-equity firms in the world. Its funds own 44 companies that have revenues in excess of €38.5 billion (£26.8 billion) and 309,000 employees worldwide.
It manages equity capital of €20.9 billion.
CVC was founded in 1981 and spun out of Citicorp in 1993.
The firm has completed more than 250 investments across a wide range of industries and countries.
In Britain it has been involved in a number of controversial deals – notably Debenhams – which it took private together with Texas Pacific, Merrill Lynch and its management, and then refloated on the stock market just over two years later at a huge profit. The shares have since performed badly and remain below their float price.
CVC also has a stake in the AA, which has been the target of a union campaign all summer over cuts to its workforce.
Unions have also led a wider campaign against private-equity, arguing that top executives were paying too little tax on their earnings.
Buy-out executives normally take most of their remuneration from gains in the size of their funds, on which they pay capital gains tax rather than higher rates of income tax.
MPs on the Treasury select committee grilled industry leaders in a series of confrontational meetings on the issue earlier this year.
CVC refused to comment.
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles

Overseas contacts and local business information

Find a course, arrange a game and save money
2007
£47,995
2008
£42,945
06/2006
£40,850
Great car insurance deals online
£33,000
Macmillan Cancer Support
Central/South West
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£30k OTE
Meltwater News
Nationwide
circa £70k
Central Office of Information
London
5% below developer pre-launch price!
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Great Homes Available on a shared Ownership Basis
Great Investment, River Views
Visit the ‘entertainment capital of the world’
at great sale prices!
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
It is very telling that the few comments in defense of this nonsense deliberately chsoe to ignore the point: whatever income these people earn - they should at LEAST pay fair taxes on it. There is no reason why a person raking in 50 million should pay less tax than the average man on the street. None at all.
Peter Skagen, Oslo, norway
18% tax? Who is the government kidding?
I paid FAR more than that on my income when I lived in the UK and I'm not a millionaire.
Moreover, If I bought anything on Ebay from say Hong Kong and had it sent to me in the UK, the govt spends all kinds of time on monye trying to tax me on it - goods as little as £50 in value! Yet peopel rake in £50MM and they pay 10% tax - or even 18% at worst.
This is an utter joke. The UK tax system is shamolic and designed to penalise the poor and middle class. This has been consistent for decades under all govt, whether Tory or Labour. It is a disgrace to the average person.
Peter Skagen, Oslo, norway
Whatever happened to fairness in society? I suppose perhaps another French revolution is in the making especially when these financial vultures spit on the rest of humanity. Wealth redistribution is definitely a good idea if only to buy peace and spare the robber barons from being lynched one day by an angry poverty stricken mob.
Charles, Angers, France
This is asset stripping at its worst, pure greed. Whose money are they using? Think about it
TJS, Canterbury , Kent
These are such "British" views. Why not get rid of the lottery also? Forget TV quiz shows, athletics, entertainment, and any other venue where large sums of money can be earned. In fact, anytime someone earns an amount of money which forces you to realize you should have studied harder in school, lets take it away from them and damn them for their hard work. These paychecks are not derived from some artificial valuation, or pulled out of thin air. Put in an overly simplistic way, the natural forces of supply and demand within the marketplace are valuing these investments at a greater price now than when they were originated. As to whether the value created is sustainable, well so far the overall market is indicating a high probability of that being so. Lastly, this "bubble," is called smart investing, and has been the keystone of capitalism throughout history. Go kill more brain cells with another pint while you wait for it to burst.
Miles Standish, Manhattan, New York
They significantly improved the financial performance of the companies they bought, which is why they have made the profits (net of all fees) that they have. Investors in the private equity funds made great returns. As for the businesses themselves, sales and customers grew, and therefore so have the number of jobs. Thats why they were able to sell the businesses at a big profit. But human nature is what it is. People will always resent the success of others and want to punish it. You lot would rather be worse off, just so long as know one has done a lot better than you.
Andrew, Truro, Cornwall
I really don't understand why People have not put more pressure on governments to stop this kind of payouts.
Investment funds must be better regulated and must be stopped from destroying value for the population in general to the expense of a few individuals who pocket large sums of money.
This is a bubble. Watch what happens in a couple of years when it is realised that the buyouts, floats and resales of companies by these funds were based on scams to extract "artificial" value that will leave the economy in a bad state. Wake up everyone before it is too late!
Seb, Newcastle, UK
I would rather see fifty million paid to the creme of the financial world - people who take enormous financial risks to force efficiency into tired old businesses, than see similar eye watering sums paid to vacuous 23 year old footballers who not only contribute absolutely nothing to the fabric of our society except kicking a ball around a field once a week, but will proceed to waste it on their absurd & decadent lifestyles, whilst all the time staggering around in full public view as if the entire world earns them some kind of respect for it.
Dean, London, UK
I do not believe that any single person deserves 50,000,000 Pounds for a year's work. Ridiculous figures. This equates to nearly 100 Pounds for every single minute of the year, sleeping, eating etc. Such ludicrous sums should be taxed to the hilt.
And indeed, what have they created?
Bob Punder, Stevenage,
And people complain about the postmen. Greed rules in the City, in the Government and in the compensation culture.
Frederick, London, UK
I suppose really, if consumers are stupid enough to stick with brands like the AA, despite their providing a fraction of the value formerly afforded their customers, then they deserve to witness our industries being excreted thus.
Jonathan, Herts, UK,
And what did they create? Nothing new..
Scamp, Aberdeenshire,