Tom Bawden in New York
We've made some changes
to The Sunday Times
KPMG, the accountancy firm, told the US Justice Department that it would unleash a “nuclear bomb” that would leave more than 1,000 companies without an auditor, if it indicted the firm for selling fraudulent tax shelters, according to newly released internal documents.
The Justice Department began to investigate KPMG in 2004 for allegedly helping wealthy clients to save money by setting up illegal tax shelters. The investigation came after Arthur Andersen’s indictment in 2002 for obstructing the US Government’s inquiry into Enron.
Roger Bennett, KPMG’s lawyer, argued that his client’s indictment could wipe out one of the four remaining large accounting groups, as the Enron inquiry had eradicated Andersen.
Mr Bennett told prosecutors at a meeting on March 22, 2005, that “a death spiral is going to start, and KPMG will be out of business”.
KPMG employed 20,000 people “whose lives will be destroyed”, he said, according to the memos, first reported by Bloomberg News.
“We’re asking you to use a smart bomb, not a nuclear bomb.” Mr Bennett said that KPMG had “gotten rid of all the wrongdoers” and promised to cooperate to help David Kelley, the US attorney bringing the case, to indict the staff involved in the scheme.
Mr Kelley referred to Mr Bennett’s argument as “ridiculous”, according to the documents, although it seemed to work. Two senior US Justice Department officials intervened and KPMG avoided an indictment.
In return, the accountant settled with the Government in April 2005 by agreeing to pay a $456 million fine.
The documents, although several years old, have only just come to light as part of a criminal investigation into 18 former KPMG partners accused of orchestrating the tax shelters. They are awaiting trial in September on charges of cheating the US Treasury out of at least $2 billion, in what the US Government has labelled America’s biggest ever criminal tax case.
The KPMG cases have prompted a full-scale investigation into the use of tax shelters in the United States.
Last month, American federal prosecutors charged four partners at Ernst & Young, the accountancy group, with a scam that allegedly used the September 11 terrorist attacks of 2001 to deprive the US Government of hundreds of millions of tax dollars. If convicted, the four could face years in jail.
The E&Y partners allegedly helped wealthy clients to cut their tax bills by creating phony losses on fictional investments that they could offset against their taxable income. It is alleged that they used “false and fraudulent factual scenarios” such as the World Trade Centre attacks, which sent the value of investments plunging across the globe, as a way to sidestep taxes, Michale Garcia, the US attorney bringing the case, said last month.
E&Y, which has not been indicted in relation to the tax shelters, allegedly made $121.7 million in fees from bogus tax shelter profits in the form of a cut of the savings that it generated for its clients. Many had made their fortunes from the technology boom.
KPMG declined to comment on the documents relating to the tax shelters.
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
See the best entries in this year's competition
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

Overseas contacts and local business information

Find a course, arrange a game and save money
2002/02
£59,995
The Midlands
2008/08
£169,950
Scotland
2007/57
£35,000
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
Competitive
CyDen
London
To £28k
Barclaycard
Various (outside London)
£
£40,000 - £50,000 + benefits
Lloyds Pharmacy
Coventry
To £38k
Barclaycard
Northampton/Liverpool
2 Bathrooms, Balcony and Garden
£359,950
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Apts From £249,950
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
True, it is not about who is richer or not, AND that the US government IS in it for all of everyone's money that they can get. What this story is about, is the fact that those who have accumulated the most money, they get to live by different rules than poor people, literally.
Example: a petty tax evader who is broke, will do hard time, and lose everything. Big bosses that work at an accounting firm that juggles money as corruptly as the FED banks do, without government backing? Nah, no, those guys don't mean any harm!
Billions in taxes avoided? So what! pay us less than $0.01 on the dollar- we'll call it even! Hide 500.00 of income? You owe us 25000.00, NOW, Mister.!!!
Benjy Ramos, Dallas, tx
It is both stunningly arrogant and patently ridiculous for KPMG to claim it is too big and too important to face up to wrongdoing. The world did not miss Arthur Andersen and its good staff found ready employment in other firms who were happy to take them and the business they brought: the same would be easily plausible were KPMG to go under. As for Ernst and Young, same story: there are many large mid tier firms now who are appraoching where the Big 4 were only a few years ago. They could easily step up to the plate if need be.
Borys Pawliw, Sydney, Australia
I say.. take 'em! Contrary to their claims... there is NO shortage of accountants. And many of them don't engage in illegal practices to defraud government or investors The world DOES NOT revolve around KPMG.
Mash, London, UK
KPMG and similar firms act as the HIgh Priests of capitalism and feel they are not bound by the rules that govern lesser mortals. The partners desire the upside of personal wealth that comes from big fees on the back of unlimited liability yet fail to control the potential risks which this greed manifesto encourages. Such firms should put their own houses in order with proper internal governance and adapt to the real world. Everyone else has to; why do they think they are so special?
Michael, Wexford, Ireland
If you pay enough you can get the devil to push your carts ?
ian, singapore, singapore
I find this stance by KPMG quite ridiculous and infuriating. Are they claiming that just because of the size and the far-reachedness of their offence that they should be allowed to go on their merry way. How about an analogy - if a murderer only kills 2 or 3 victims he goes to jail but, wait a minute, if he kills, say, 200 or 300, then the crime is so large and far reaching that all he has to do is pay a fine without admitting any guilt - heaven forbid that there should be an opening for a law suit by actually being found guilty of anything - and continue on as if nothing has happened. It happens all of the time. Money is King! But, here's the kicker. I don't blame people for playing the system. It's human nature. But, when they get caught, the system, as protectors of the common investor, should do more than just bare its teeth. It should use those teeth!
john griffiths, atlanta, usa, georgia
Money makes money!
C F Brockbank, Preston, UK
Folks, governments going after "tax shelters" is about one thing only: Not letting anyone's money escape their clutches under any circumstances.
The modern world - with internet, communication, travel, international business - allows for the fleet of foot to avoid the tax man. But the tax man demands to be fed, right or wrong, law or no law.
So, they slam the stupid, heavy hand of government against anyone involved, legally or not.
Anderson was killed by this, and KPMG may be next.
The whole operation thrives on public envy. If you like this, it is because you envy people richer than you. It makes you feel good to see them hurt. Suggest you take a good look into your soul - if you have the guts.
PR, Orlando, USA
I think KPMG's blackmail to US government which it does make a sense because we all need the job. How about Enron's employee's job and their pension? I think KPMG's employee have much highier salary than Enron's employees therefore they are better off when they loss their own job.
Kim Young , New York, USA
Andersens was, rightly, brought down by its own complacency and arrogance. (The fact the indictment was overturned on appeal just made it funnier). It looks like KPMG has been lucky to escape a similar fate.
David Harrison, Manchester, UK
If you pay enough you can get the devil to push your carts ?
Ian, singapore, singapore