Robert Lindsay and Joe Bolger
2 for 1 tickets to Singin' In The Rain, this coming Monday. Book now
The Office of Fair Trading is to launch an investigation into whether banks should be forced to charge customers for having current accounts.
The study will sit alongside its inquiry, announced last month, into the fairness of penalty charges for unauthorised overdrafts.
The OFT believes that banks may be subsidising "free" current accounts with hidden fees, such as heavy charges for unauthorised overdrafts when customers go into the red, often without realising.
The regulator said it would examine "whether ... so-called 'free if in credit' current accounts deliver sufficiently high levels of transparency and value for consumers".
It will examine whether competition would be improved "if there were a shift away from the widespread provision" of these free current accounts.
It aims to publish the findings of its study by the end of the year but did not rule out a referral to the Competition Commission, should it need to impose tough sanctions on the banks.
John Fingleton, chief executive of the OFT, has previously raised the possibility that banks should be forced to make up-front charges for current accounts in return for the removal of hidden charges.
The OFT's investigation comes after the Competition Commission investigated the banking market in Northern Ireland. It concluded that banks there have "unduly complex charging structures and practices". The OFT believes the same issues are likely to be relevant in Britain.
Last April the OFT ruled that some very high penalty charges for overdrafts and credit cards were unlawful.
The OFT's initial inquiry into the fairness of overdraft fees came in the wake of widespread public outcry at excessive fees imposed when people did not realise they had overdrawn.
The Citizens Advice Bureau, welcoming the inquiry, today highlighted a case where a man in Surrey went 20p overdrawn because of a direct debit payment, was charged a total of £300 by his bank and threatened by debt collectors with court action if he did not pay.
It also highlighted a single mother with three children and on benefits in Somerset who was charged £90 for an unauthorised overdraft, which swallowed up most of her child and council tax benefit.
Barrister Tom Brennan is hoping to bring a test case against NatWest. He is seeking damages from the bank after running up penalty charges of £38 for each lapse. He claims the charges were unlawful because, by his estimate, it costs the bank £2.50 to cover the cost of a customer breaching its overdraft limit.
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
Have you ever dreamed of owning your own racehorse or a beautiful painting?
Enjoy comfort, safety, space and great design. Plus enter our great competition
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Are you California dreaming? Explore the wonders of the Golden State. Also enter our fantastic competition
Do you have what it takes to be a Times photographer?
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
Find out to make the most of your money with our wealth management guides
Need help with your property? We have an entire how to guide - buying, selling, letting, moving, to help you
We are seeking entries for the inaugural Sunday Times Best Green Companies Awards
Enjoy some wonderful inspiring wildlife moments
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

Find a course, arrange a game and save money
2007/07
£57,500
South East England
2007/07
£40,995
South East England
2006/06
£41,995
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
£40-55k+benefits+uncapped commission
Morgan Keating
South East
Up to £30,000
GLE
London
£
c£75,000 + executive benefits
Morgan Keating
London and South
Unpaid with travel expenses
Network Rail
Globrix, the property search engine
Visit Times Online Property for homes for sale or rent
Residential development site with planning permission
£1,500,000
Mortgages, bank accounts & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Dinarobin Hotel Golf & Spa 7 nights
From £1830 per person – saving £530.
Walking & multi-activity holidays in Cauterets. Stylish self-catering apartments.
From 350€ for 7 nights.
SAVE 25% on Sandals Luxury Resorts
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
One of the claims made when repealing The Truck Acts was that banking would be free.
Free banking is the basis of the Government's attempt to pay Pensions etc. into Bank accounts.
Acknowledging that it is the nature of Government to leech on its captive population, shouldn't they at least protect us from competition, by legislating against bank charges on current accounts?
john shale, wigan, england
If banks lent me money at the same rate as I have to pay to borrow from them, then an end to free banking might be appropriate. As it is they already make a mint out of me as a result of the difference between rates, and now I will have to pay for the privilege of this extortion.
Peter, Torquay, UK
I do not beleive that it is fair that the people on the lower income scale should be charged 'penalty' charges, for going overdrawn, over and above what the actual cost to the bank is especially as a way to give 'free' banking to other customers. The banks make plenty of profit (eg 4b) each year, why not make say 3.5b ! Free Banking should still be made available without a significant drop in profit to the banks!. Some banks who give 'free' banking, still charge, e.g. Barclays Connect accounts carry a monthly fee anyway. Lets get real here, THE BANKS SHOULD BE MADE TO EXPLAIN AND BE ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR CHARGES!!!
Jenny, Cardiff, UK
Why should those of us who manage our accounts properly be charged because other people who can't manage their finances may get their charges reduced? I used to bank with Lloyds but changed to Nationwide some years ago when Lloyds started charging if I went overdrawn, even if it was within my overdraft limit. At Nationwide I can go overdrawn and do not get charged (other than overdraft interest which is at a reasonable rate) as long as I stay within my agreed limit.
Stephen, Aylesbury, UK
These 'free' bank accounts make more than enough money for the banks already. Most people's salaries are deposited in the account at the end of the month and a balance is usually available until the end of the next month. Don't tell me that the banks just sit on this money and they don't use the funds to make themselves a profit. So, to avoid charges, do I ask for my salary to be paid in cash and keep it under the mattress??
Cathy, London,
Hee,hee,hee. Should the banks be allowed to rip us off by offering no charge current accounts ? Are you Oliver Pritchett in drag ?
Tom Benford, Kyoto, Japan
It would be a wholly oppressive and quite improper for the state to compel banks, by force, to charge for any given service that they would willingly provide for free. Such abuses of executive power should not be tolerated, and serious consideration should be given to whether the existence of the competition with its present powers is anywhere near justified, given the necessary presumption in favour of liberty.
Why on earth should those responsible people who, dilligently, maintain their accounts in good credit should be compelled by executive fiat to suffer additional charges in order that the state should compel financial institutions to protect those who are not inclined to maintain finances in good order from the cost of their own fiscal folly? People should never be protected from their own stupidity at any cost to the rational and well-ordered.
James E. Petts, Burnham, Slough, England
The OFT should go a little further and investigate all bank charges in the UK. We live on our boat (Honduras as the moment) and 2 years ago had to send some money to Trinidad to pay for our mooring fees whilst we were looking after my mother in the UK who had terminal cancer. No bank quoted less than 20 pounds to send about 500 pounds to Trinidad. The building society where I had my account didn't know how to do it at all despite having all the EBAN numbers. My husband's Danish bank did the whole thing with no fuss for 40 Kroner = about 4 pounds.
Jennifer, Honduras
Jennifer, La Cieba, Honduras
Im 20 years old, I live with my partner and between us we have 3 current accounts. I cannot believe that we would be charged for having these accounts as I am fully aware of the charges that will be made should we spend more money than we have.
Whats so wrong with charges? The bank warns you of the charge, tells you when you have been charged and may sometimes remove the charge if you explain your circumstances.
If people want to spend more money than they have then get a loan.
I like hidden charges, I dont know Im paying for it and therefore do not feel that I am being conned into paying for something else I dont want.
VC, Newcastle,
what a load of tosh!
alan, dublin, ireland
This review proves that the OFT is nothing more than an irrelevance.
Consistently, over a period of time, it has always managed to prove that it is on the side of 'big business' whenever a decision of 'might versus right' was needed.
A replacement organisation, whose aim is to look after the public interest, should be on the agenda of whichever party wins the next general election (and it won't be Labour).
Alan Leeke, Bewdley, Worcs
Why should people who do keep their accounts in the black be penalised because of those who do not?
sam, Portsmouth,
Dear Sir / Madam,
Banks are already getting a disguised benefit by their consistent reluctance to make payments be credited to the receiving account on the same day. That is the procedure on the continent and the UK banks are getting at least a couple of days interest by their deliberate unwillingness to act. If this continues I see no justification to end free banking.
Yours Faithfully,
David Mowle, Oswaldtwistle, England
All the OFT succeed in doing is passing on charges to customers who don't mess up their accounts.Removing the late payment charge on credit cards resulted in higher interest charges for diligent customers.
The OFT is a joke.
Michael J Rigby, Blackburn, England
Great. In over thirty years I have never had to pay a penny for my current account. Now in the name of 'fairness' I am going to be charged for something which has been free.
Charging for current accounts will in no way be compensated by a small reduction in charges for unathorised borrowing of their money and will create a net profit for the banks.
Ian, Ipswich, UK